Palabras clave
Standardized patients
Standardized patients Psychology education
Clinical simulation
Student cConfidence Pacientes estandarizados
Inteligencia artificial
Educación en psicología
Simulación clínica
Confianza del estudiante
Cómo citar
Resumen
Antecedentes: La integración de la inteligencia artificial (IA) como pacientes estandarizados (PE) en la educación en psicología puede mejorar el aprendizaje experiencial y la confianza de los estudiantes. Este estudio analizó la efectividad de simulaciones basadas en IA para desarrollar habilidades de comunicación e influir en el estado afectivo de estudiantes de psicología. Método: Estudio de intervención de métodos mixtos con 31 estudiantes de tercer año, utilizando ChatGPT como PE. Se recopilaron datos cuantitativos sobre estado afectivo, actitudes hacia la comunicación y percepciones de conocimiento y habilidades antes y después de la simulación. También se obtuvieron datos cualitativos mediante preguntas abiertas y un grupo focal. Los datos se analizaron mediante ANOVA de medidas repetidas y análisis temático. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron una disminución significativa en el afecto negativo y un aumento en la percepción de conocimiento y habilidades tras la simulación. Los hallazgos cualitativos respaldaron estos resultados, indicando mayor confianza y menor ansiedad en las interacciones con el paciente simulado. Conclusiones: El uso de IA como PE es una herramienta pedagógica eficaz que complementa los métodos tradicionales, mejora el aprendizaje experiencial, refuerza la confianza en habilidades profesionales y tiene un impacto positivo en el estado afectivo de los estudiantes.
Citas
Abbott, E. F., Laack, T. A., Licatino, L. K., Wood-Wentz, C. M., Warner, P. A., Torsher, L. C., Newman, J. S., & Rieck, K. M. (2021). Comparison of dyad versus individual simulation-based training on stress, anxiety, cognitive load, and performance: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), Article 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02786-6
Alrashidi, N., Pasay An, E., Alrashedi, M. S., Alqarni, A. S., Gonzales, F., Bassuni, E. M., Pangket, P., Estadilla, L., Benjamin, L. S., & Ahmed, K. E. (2023). Effects of simulation in improving the self-confidence of student nurses in clinical practice: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), Article 815. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04793-1
Baile, J. I. (2024). Patient with depression created by freely accessible artificial intelligence for the teaching of Psychology. Preliminary study of its validity. Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, 27, 7-42. https://doi. org/10.51302/tce.2024.19069
Basnet, S., Shrestha, S. P., Shrestha, R., Shrestha, A. P., Shrestha, A., Sahu, S., Mhatre, B., & Silwal, P. (2024). Effect of simulation-based emergency airway management education on the knowledge, skills and perceived confidence of medical interns. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 86(9), 5191-5198. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002376
Burrell, S. A., Ross, J. G., D’Annunzio, C., & Heverly, M. (2023). Standardized patient simulation in an oncology symptom management seminar-style course: prelicensure nursing student outcomes. Journal of Cancer Education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 38(1), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187- 021-02096-x
Carrero-Planells, A., Pol-Castañeda, S., Alamillos-Guardiola, M. C., Prieto- Alomar, A., Tomás-Sánchez, M., & Moreno-Mulet, C. (2021). Students and teachers’ satisfaction and perspectives on high-fidelity simulation for learning fundamental nursing procedures: A mixed-method study. Nurse Education Today, 104, Article 104981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nedt.2021.104981
Clinard, E. S. (2022). Increasing student confidence with medically complex infants through simulation: a mixed methods investigation. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 31(2), 942-958. https://doi. org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00234
Cho, M. K., & Kim, M. Y. (2024). The effect of virtual reality simulation on nursing students’ communication skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, Article 1351123. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1351123
Curry, L., & Nunez-Smith, M. (2015). Mixed methods in health sciences research. A practical primer. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dawood, E., Alshutwi, S. S., Alshareif, S., & Shereda, H. A. (2024). Evaluation of the effectiveness of standardized patient simulation as a teaching method in psychiatric and mental health nursing. Nursing Reports, 14(2), 1424-1438. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep14020107
Duff, J. P., Morse, K. J., Seelandt, J., Gross, I. T., Lydston, M., Sargeant, J., Dieckmann, P., Allen, J. A., Rudolph, J. W., & Kolbe, M. (2024). Debriefing methods for simulation in healthcare: a systematic review. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 19(1S), S112-S121. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000765
Escribano, S., Juliá-Sanchis, R., García-Sanjuán, S., Congost-Maestre, N., & Cabañero-Martínez, M. J. (2021). Psychometric properties of the attitudes towards medical communication scale in nursing students. PeerJ, 9, Article e11034. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11034
Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Okatta, A. U., Amaechi, E. C., Elendu, T. C., Ezeh, C. P., & Elendu, I. D. (2024). The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine, 103(27), Article e38813. https:// doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000038813
Elosua, P., Aguado, D., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Abad, F. J., & Santamaría, P. (2023). New trends in digital technology-based psychological and educational assessment. Psicothema, 35(1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2022.241
Farina, C. L., Moreno, J., & Schneidereith, T. (2024). Using simulation to improve communication skills. The Nursing clinics of North America, 59(3), 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2024.02.007
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https:// doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134-2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 Flanagan, O. L., & Cummings, K. M. (2023). Standardized patients in medical education: a review of the literature. Cureus, 15(7), Article e42027. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42027
García-Carpintero Blas, E., Vélez-Vélez, E., Gómez-Moreno, C., Martínez- Arce, A., Tovar-Reinoso, A., Rodriguez-Gómez, P., Vaquero Velerdas, L., & López-Martín, I. (2024). Simulation with a standardised patient to reduce stigma towards people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder among nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 52, 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2024.07.015
Gerzina, H. A., & Stovsky, E. (2023). Standardized patient assessment of learners in medical simulation. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J., Alsina-Jurnet, I., Rangel-Gómez, M. V., Aguilar- Alonso, A., Jarne-Esparcia, A. J., Andrés-Pueyo, A., & Talarn-Caparrós, A. (2008). Virtual intelligent agents to train abilities of diagnosis in Psychology and Psychiatry. In G. A. Tsihrintzis, M. Virvou, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), New directions in intelligent interactive multimedia (pp. 497-505). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68127-4_51
Gutierrez-Maldonado, J., Andres-Pueyo, A., Jarne, A., Talarn, A., Ferrer, M., & Achotegui, J. (2017). Virtual reality for training diagnostic skills in Anorexia Nervosa: A usability assessment. In S. Lackey, & J. Chen (Eds.), Virtual, augmented and mixed reality (pp. 239-247). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57987-0_19
Hawkins, A., & Tredgett, K. (2016). Use of high-fidelity simulation to improve communication skills regarding death and dying: a qualitative study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 6(4), 474-478. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001081
Higgins, M., Madan, C., & Patel, R. (2021). Development and decay of procedural skills in surgery: A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based medical education interventions. The Surgeon: Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 19(4), e67-e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.07.013
Hillier, M., Williams, T. L., & Chidume, T. (2023). Standardization of standardized patient training in medical simulation. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
Isaza-Restrepo, A., Gómez, M. T., Cifuentes, G., & Argüello, A. (2018). The virtual patient as a learning tool: a mixed quantitative qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), Article 297. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1395-8
Jeon, Y., Choi, H., Lee, U., & Kim, H. (2024). Technology-based interactive communication simulation addressing challenging communication situations for nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing: Official
Journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 53, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.05.002
Johnson S. L. (2019). Impact, growth, capacity-building of mixed methods research in the Health Sciences. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(2), Article 7403. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7403
Johnson, K. V., Scott, A. L., & Franks, L. (2020). Impact of standardized patients on first semester nursing students self-confidence, satisfaction, and communication in a simulated clinical case. SAGE Open Nursing, 6, Article 2377960820930153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960820930153 Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of
learning and development. FT press.
Kolbe, M., Grande, B., & Spahn, D. R. (2015). Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude and setting. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Anaesthesiology, 29(1), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002
Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), Article 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267
Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping (Vol. 464). Springer.
Liu, X., Wu, C., Lai, R., Lin, H., Xu, Y., Lin, Y., & Zhang, W. (2023). ChatGPT: when the artificial intelligence meets standardized patients in clinical training. Journal of Translational Medicine, 21, Article 447. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04314-0
López, A.I., & López-Chicheri, I. (July 2024). Entrenamiento en habilidades de comunicación orientadas a la intervención mediante simulación clínica en psicología (SCP) [Intervention-oriented communication skills training through clinical simulation in Psychology (SCP)]. I Congreso Interprofesional de Simulación-OneHealth. https://simulacion-onehealth. org/ponencia/entrenamiento-en-habilidades-de-comunicacion-orientadas- a-la-intervencion-mediante-simulacion-clinica-en-psicologia-scp/
López-Gómez, I., Hervás, G., & Vázquez, C. (2015). Adaptación de las“ Escalas de afecto positivo y negativo“(PANAS) en una muestra general española. [Adaptation of the Positive and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS) in a general Spanish sample]. Psicología Conductual, 23(3), 529-548.
Monahan, L., Eaves, C. L., Watson, J. C., Friese, J., McKenna, L., & Estrada- Ibarra, E. (2024). Improving adolescent psychosocial assessment through standardized patient simulation: an interdisciplinary quality improvement initiative. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(3), Article 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21030283
Morcela, O. A. (2022). ChatGPT: la IA está aquí y nos desafía [ChatGPT: AI is here and challenging us]. AACINI-Revista Internacional de Ingeniería Industrial, 6. https://riii.fi.mdp.edu.ar/index.php/AACINI-RIII/article/ view/67
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. The European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1381 4788.2017.1375091
Moss, C. R. (2023). Neonatal fragile skin: novel use of simulation to improve knowledge and confidence for neonatal nurse practitioner students. Nurse Educator, 48(4), E122-E125. https://doi.org/10.1097/ NNE.0000000000001354
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Oliveira, G., Oliveira, F. S. E., Coelho, A. S. G., Cavalcante, A. M. R. Z., Vieira, F. V. M., Fonseca, L. M. M., Campbell, S. H., & Aredes, N. D. A. (2022). Effect of simulation on stress, anxiety, and self-confidence in nursing students: Systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 133, Article 104282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104282
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (March 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
Pedrajas, M. L., Sanz, A., García-Carpintero, E., Martínez, E., Uceda, S. (2024). Training GPT as a standardized patient. In M. D. Díaz-Noguera, C. Hervás-Gómez, & F. Sánchez-Vera (Coords.), Artificial Intelligence and Education (pp.189-204). Octaedro. https://doi.org/10.36006/09643-1-12 Peñaloza-Salazar, C., Gutierrez-Maldonado, J., Ferrer-Garcia, M., Garcia- Palacios, A., Andres-Pueyo, A., & Aguilar-Alonso, A. (2011). Simulated interviews 3.0: virtual humans to train abilities of diagnosis –usability assessment. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 167, 165-169.
https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-766-6-165
Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Costantini, G. (2018). A practical primer to power analysis for simple experimental designs. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 31(1), 1-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.5334/IRSP.181
Rizzo, A., Lange, B., Buckwalter, J. G., Forbell, E., Kim, J., Sagae, K., Williams, J., Difede, J., Rothbaum, B. O., Reger, G., Parsons, T., & Kenny,
P. (2011). SimCoach: An intelligent virtual human system for providing healthcare information and support. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 10(4), 277-281. https://doi.org/10.1515/ IJDHD.2011.046
Rodríguez, S., Condés, E., & Arriaga, A. (2021). Irrupción de la simulación clínica online en tiempos de COVID-19. Una experiencia ilustrativa de asignatura en el Grado de Psicología. Revista de la Fundación de Educación Médica, 24(2), 101-104. https://dx.doi.org/10.33588/ fem.242.1118
Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. https://doi.org/10.3758/ PBR.16.2.225
Ruiz-Rodríguez, J., Bados López, A., Fusté Escolano, A., García-Grau, E., Saldaña García, C., & Lluch Canut, T. (2016). Aprendizaje experiencial de habilidades terapéuticas y análisis de su utilidad en función de la personalidad. Behavioral Psychology, 24, 405-422. http://hdl.handle. net/2445/155366
Scherr, R., Halaseh, F. F., Spina, A., Andalib, S., & Rivera, R. (2023). ChatGPT interactive medical simulations for early clinical education: case study. JMIR Medical Education, 9, Article e49877. https://doi.org/10.2196/49877
Sezer, B., Sezer, T. A., Teker, G. T., & Elcin, M. (2023). Developing a virtual patient: design, usability, and learning effect in communication skills training. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), Article 891. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04860-7
Sezgin, M. G., & Bektas, H. (2023). Effectiveness of interprofessional simulation-based education programs to improve teamwork and communication for students in the healthcare profession: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nurse Education Today, 120, Article 105619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105619
Talbot, T., & Rizzo, A. “Skip”. (2019). Virtual human standardized patients for clinical training. In A. “Skip” Rizzo & S. Bouchard (Eds.), Virtual reality for psychological and neurocognitive interventions (pp. 387-405). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9482-3_17
Ton, D. N. M., Duong, T. T. K., Tran, H. T., Nguyen, T. T. T., Mai, H. B., Nguyen, P. T. A., Ho, B. D., & Ho, T. T. T. (2024). Effects of standardized patient simulation and mobile applications on nursing students’ clinical competence, self-efficacy, and cultural competence: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(4), Article 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21040515
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM, 9(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168
Yu, J. H., Chang, H. J., Kim, S. S., Park, J. E., Chung, W. Y., Lee, S. K., Kim, M., Lee, J. H., & Jung, Y. J. (2021). Effects of high-fidelity simulation education on medical students’ anxiety and confidence. PloS one, 16(5), Article e0251078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251078