Palabras clave
Adolescents
Scale adaptation
Self-determination theory
Digital communication Florecimiento digital
Adolescentes
Adaptación de escala
Teoría de la autodeterminación
Comunicación digital
Cómo citar
Resumen
Antecedentes: Los adolescentes están inmersos en la comunicación digital, con efectos positivos y negativos en su bienestar. El florecimiento digital describe percepciones positivas de dicha comunicación—conectividad, autoexpresión auténtica, comparación social positiva, participación cívica y autocontrol—y su aporte al bienestar. En España no existe un instrumento validado para adolescentes. Método: Adaptamos y validamos la Escala de Florecimiento Digital para Adolescentes (DFSA) españoles. Estudio 1: incluyó encuesta piloto (n = 13) y entrevistas cognitivas (n = 10) para mejorar claridad y adecuación cultural. Estudio 2: encuesta transversal (n = 1.786) examinando estructura latente de DFSA, invarianza métrica por sexo y edad, fiabilidad interna de las puntuaciones y evidencia de validez basada en las relaciones con otras variables. Estudio 3 evaluó fiabilidad test-retest de las puntuaciones e invariancia longitudinal en seis semanas (n = 289). Resultados: Estudio 1: mejoró claridad y relevancia cultural. Estudio 2: confirmó un modelo de cinco factores, con invariancia estricta por edad e invariancia métrica por género. Todas las
subescalas se correlacionaron con indicadores de bienestar. Estudio 3: mostró estabilidad temporal de las puntuaciones baja-moderada, confirmando invariancia longitudinal escalar. Conclusiones: La DFSA española es una herramienta prometedora para evaluar el florecimiento digital de los adolescentes en España.
Citas
Berk, L. E. (2022). Development through the lifespan. Sage Publications.
Beutel, M. E., Klein, E. M., Brähler, E., Reiner, I., Jünger, C., Michal, M., Wiltink, J., Wild, P. S., Münzel, T., Lackner, K. J., & Tibubos, A. N. (2017). Loneliness in the general population: Prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1262-x
Blanco-Canitrot, D., Alvarado, J. M., & Ondé, D. (2018). Consequences of disregarding metric invariance on diagnosis and prognosis using psychological tests. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00167
Bodroža, B., & Jovanović, T. (2016). Validation of the new scale for measuring behaviours of Facebook users: Psycho-Social Aspects of Facebook Use (PSAFU). Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 425-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.032
Boer, M., van den Eijnden, R. J., Boniel-Nissim, M., Wong, S. L., Inchley, J. C., Badura, P., ... & Stevens, G. W. (2020). Adolescents’ intense and problematic social media use and their well-being in 29 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S89-S99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.02.014
Buchanan, E. M., & Scofield, J. E. (2018). Methods to detect low quality data and its implication for psychological research. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 2586-2596. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1035-6
Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
Chang, C. (2022). Being inspired by media content: Psychological processes leading to inspiration. Media Psychology, 26(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2097927
Chen,F.F.(2007).Sensitivityofgoodnessoffitindexestolackofmeasurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Correa-Rojas, J. (2021). Intraclass correlation coefficient: Applications to estimate the temporal stability of a measuring instrument. Ciencias Psicológicas, 15(2), 1-16.
Datareportal. (2024). Digital 2024: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-global-overview-report
De la Fuente, R., Parra, A., & Sánchez-Queija, I. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale and measurement invariance between two samples of Spanish university students. Evaluation & the health professions, 40(4), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278717703446
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale Development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). Sage Publications. Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
Girelli, L., Cavicchiolo, E., Lucidi, F., Cozzolino, M., Alivernini, F., & Manganelli, S. (2019). Psychometric properties and validity of a brief scale measuring basic psychological needs satisfaction in adolescents. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 20, 215- 229. https://doi.org/10.7358/ECPS-2019-020-GIRE
Gudka, M., Gardiner, K. L. K., & Lomas, T. (2023). Towards a framework for flourishing through social media: a systematic review of 118 research studies. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(1), 86-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1991447
Hernández, A., Hidalgo-Montesinos, M. D., Hambleton, R. K., & Gómez- Benito, J. (2020). International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema, 32(3), 390–398. https://hdl.handle.net/2445/185025
Hoareau, N., Bagès, C., & Guerrien, A. (2021). Cyberbullying, self- control, information, and electronic communication technologies: do adolescents know how to exercise self-control on the internet?. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 5(4), 306-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-021-00099-2
Holly, L., Wong, B. L. H., van Kessel, R., Awah, I., Agrawal, A., & Ndili, N. (2023). Optimising adolescent wellbeing in a digital age. BMJ, 380, e068279. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068279
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huang, C. (2020). A meta-analysis of the problematic social media use and mental health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 68(1), 12-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020978434
Janicke-Bowles, S. (2024). Digital flourishing in the US: Validation of the digital flourishing scale (DFS) and demographic exploration. Communication studies, 75(3), 322-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2023.2289688
Janicke-Bowles, S. H., Buckley, T. M., Rey, R., Wozniak, T., Meier, A., & Lomanowska, A. (2023). Digital flourishing: Conceptualizing and assessing positive perceptions of mediated social interactions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(3), 1013-1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902023-00619-5
Janicke-Bowles, S. H., Raney, A. A., Oliver, M. B., Dale, K. R., Zhao, D., Neumann, D., Clayton, R. B., & Hendry, A. A. (2022). Inspiration on social media: Applying an entertainment perspective to longitudinally explore mental health and well-being. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 16(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2022-2-1
Jones, L. M., & Mitchell, K. J. (2015). Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship. New media & society, 18(9), 2063-2079. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815577797
Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2021). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (Version 0.5-5) [R package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
Kassambara, A. (2019). ggcorrplot: Visualization of a correlation matrix using ‘ggplot2’ (Version 0.1.3) [R package]. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=ggcorrplot
Kjell, O. N. E., & Diener, E. (2021). Abbreviated three-item versions of the satisfaction with life scale and the harmony in life scale yield as strong psychometric properties as the original scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 103(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2020.1737093
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(08), 2207-2230.
Lysenstøen, C., Bøe, T., Hjetland, G. J., & Skogen, J. C. (2021). A Review of the Relationship Between Social Media Use and Online Prosocial Behavior Among Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 579347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579347
Mackinnon, S., Curtis, R., & O’Connor, R. (2022). A tutorial in longitudinal measurement invariance and cross-lagged panel models using lavaan. Meta-Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2020.2595
Magis-Weinberg, L., Ballonoff Suleiman, A., & Dahl, R. E. (2021). Context, development, and digital media: Implications for very young adolescents in LMICs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 632713. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.632713
Manning, N., Penfold-Mounce, R., Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. (2017). Politicians, celebrities and social media: a case of informalisation? Journal of Youth Studies, 20(2), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1206867
McNeish, D. (2023). Psychometric properties of sum scores and factor scores differ even when their correlation is 0.98: A response to Widaman and Revelle. Behavior Research Methods, 55(8), 4269-4290. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02016-x
Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2021). Computer-mediated communication, social media, and mental health: a conceptual and empirical meta- review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1182-1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220958224
Meier, A., & Schäfer, S. (2018). The positive side of social comparison on social network sites: How envy can drive inspiration on Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(7), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0708
Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S., & Possler, D. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 721-743. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
O’Keeffe, G. S., & Clarke-Pearson, K. (2011). The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics, 127(4), 800-804. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0054
Ortuño-Sierra, J., Aritio-Solana, R., Chocarro de Luis, E., Nalda, F. N., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Subjective well-being in adolescence: New psychometric evidences on the satisfaction with life scale. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1360179
Osatuyi, B., & Turel, O. (2018). Tug of war between social self-regulation and habit: Explaining the experience of momentary social media addiction symptoms. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.037
Padilla, J. L., & Benítez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response processes. Psicothema, 26(1), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2013.259
Revelle, W. (2023). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (Version 2.3.9) [R package]. Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Rosič, J., Janicke-Bowles, S. H., Carbone, L., Lobe, B., & Vandenbosch, L. (2022). Positive digital communication among youth: The development and validation of the digital flourishing scale for adolescents. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.975557
Rosič, J., Schreurs, L., Janicke-Bowles, S. H., & Vandenbosch, L. (2024). Trajectories of digital flourishing in adolescence: The predictive roles of developmental changes and digital divide factors. Child Development, 95(5), 1586-1602. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14101
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of statistical software, 48(1), 1-36.
Ryan, K., Gannon-Slater, N., & Culbertson, M. J. (2012). Improving survey methods with cognitive interviews in small-and medium-scale evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 414-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214012441499
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Ryan, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000162
Savci, M., Ercengiz, M., & Aysan, F. (2018). Turkish adaptation of the social media disorder scale in adolescents. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 55(3), 248-255. https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2017.19285
Schreurs, L., & Vandenbosch, L. (2022). The Development and Validation of Measurement Instruments to Address Interactions with Positive Social Media Content. Media Psychology, 25(2), 262-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2021.1925561
Schreurs, L., & Vandenbosch, L. (2024). Enhancing adolescents’ emotion regulation in the social media context: A cluster randomized controlled trial of the Vibe Check social media literacy intervention. OSF. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kagyu
Smallenbroek, O., Zelenski, J. M., & Whelan, D. C. (2017). Authenticity as a eudaimonic construct: The relationships among authenticity, values, and valence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1187198
Smith, D., Leonis, T., & Anandavalli, S. (2021). Belonging and loneliness in cyberspace: impacts of social media on adolescents’ well-being. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1898914
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
Trucharte, A., Calderón, L., Cerezo, E., Contreras, A., Peinado, V., & Valiente, C. (2023). Three-item loneliness scale: psychometric properties and normative data of the Spanish version. Current Psychology, 42(9), 7466-7474. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-021-02110-X/TABLES/7
Vanden Abeele, M. (2021). Digital wellbeing as a dynamic construct. Communication Theory, 31(4), 932-955. https://doi.org/10.1093/CT/QTAA024
Vandenbosch, L., Beullens, K., Vanherle, R., & Schreurs, L. (2025). Digital media uses and effects: The contributing roles of time. Journal of Children and Media, 19(1), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2-024.2438690
Vincent, E. A. (2016). Social media as an avenue to achieving sense of belonging among college students. Vistas Online, 36, 1-14.
Werner, N. E., Bumpus, M. F., & Rock, D. (2010). Involvement in internet aggression during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 607-619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9419-7
Yao, W., Hou, H., Yang, P., & Ni, S. (2025). The co-occurrence of adolescent smartphone addiction and academic burnout: The role of smartphone stress and digital flourishing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(4), 4987-5007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13017-yhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13017-y
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308-1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x