A new look at fiscal sustainability: an attempt to reveal the relationship between the sustainability of external debt and the inequality


  • Yasunori Fujita Keio University




Researches on sustainability of public debt have been conducted extensively focusing on various criteria, such as debt/GDP ratio, debt/export ratio, no-bubble condition, banks’ home bias etc. The present paper attempts to look at the problem from a different angle. That is, following the recent literatures that pay attention to the inequality, we examine the relationship between the sustainability of external debt and the inequality. It is revealed that in order for the external debt to be sustainable, country should be more equal, while the initial debt/GDP ratio should be smaller and the interest rate on the external debt should be lower.


Asonuma, Tamon, Bakhache, Said and Hesse, Heiko. (2015) Is banks’ home bias good or bad for public debt sustainability? IMF Working Paper No. 15/44.

Bohn, Henning. (1998) The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (3), 949-963.

Bohn, Henning. (2008) The sustainability of fiscal policy in the United States, in Sustainability of Public Debt by Neck, R. and Sturm, J.-E. (eds), 15-49. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.

Boz, Emine, D’Erasmo, Pablo N. and Durdu, C. Bora. (2014) Sovereign risk and bank balance sheets: The role of macroprudential policies, manuscript.

Celasun, Oya, Debrun, Xavier and Ostry, Jonathan D. (2006) Primary surplus behavior and risks to fiscal sustainability in emerging market countries: A ‘fan-chart’ approach,” IMF Staff Papers 53(3), 401–25.

Chalk, Nigel A. (2000) The sustainability of bond-financed deficits: An overlapping

generations approach, Journal of Monetary Economics 45, 293-328.

Cho, Hye-jin. (2015) Economic size and debt sustainability against Piketty’s “Capital Inequality,” ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives 4(2), 21-42

Collignon, Stefan. (2012) Fiscal policy rules and the sustainability of public debt in Europe, International Economic Review, 53 (2), 539-567.

Fujita, Yasunori. (2015) Missing equation in Piketty’s r-g theory, Economics and Business Letters, 4(2), 57-62.

Gennaioli, Nicola, Martin, Alberto and Rossi, Stefano. (2014) Sovereign default, domestic banks, and financial institutions, Journal of Finance, Vol. 69 (2), 819–866.

Hamilton, James D. and Flavin, Marjorie A. (1986) On the limitations of government borrowing: A framework for empirical testing, American Economic Review vol.76, 808-816.

Harrod, Roy F. (1939) An essay in dynamic theory. The Economic Journal 49 (193), 14–33.

Kremers, Jeroen J.M.(1988) Long-run limits on the U.S. federal debt. Economics Letters, 28(3), 259–262.

Mendoza, Enrique G. and Oviedo, P. Marcelo. (2006) Fiscal Policy and Macroeconomic Uncertainty in Developing Countries: The Tale of the Tormented Insurer, NBER Working Papers 12586, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Piketty, Thomas. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, translated by Arthur Goldhammer (Belknap Press).

Piketty, Thomas, Sachs, Jeffrey, Flassbeck, Heiner, Rodrik, Dani and Wren-Lewis, Simon. (2015) Austerity has failed: An open letter from Thomas Piketty to Angela Merkel, The Nation.

Roubini, Nouriel. (2001) Debt sustainability: How to assess whether a country is insolvent. NYU.

Trehan, Bharat and Walsh, Carl E. (1991) Testing intertemporal budget constraints: Theory and applications to U.S. federal budget and current account deficits. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 23(2), 206–223.

Wilcox, David W. (1989) The sustainability of government deficits: Implications of the present-value borrowing constraint. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 21(3), 291–306.

Yakita, Akira. (2008) Sustainability of public debt, public capital formation, and endogenous growth in an overlapping generations setting, Journal of Public Economics 92(3-4), 897-914.




How to Cite

Fujita, Y. (2015). A new look at fiscal sustainability: an attempt to reveal the relationship between the sustainability of external debt and the inequality. Economics and Business Letters, 4(4), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.4.4.2015.161-165