License or entry with vertical differentiation in duopoly

Authors

  • Masahiko Hattori
  • Yasuhito Tanaka Faculty of Economics, Doshisha University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.5.1.2016.17-29

Abstract

We consider choice of options for a foreign innovating firm to license its technology for producing the high quality good to a domestic firm or to enter the market of the domestic country with or without license. Under the assumption of uniform distribution about taste parameters of consumers; when cost functions are linear, if the low quality good's quality is not low, license without entry is optimum; if the low quality good's quality is low, both of entry without license and license without entry are optimum; when cost functions are quadratic, if the high quality good's quality is not high, entry with license is optimum; if the high quality good's quality is high, license without entry is optimum.

References

Boone, J. (2001), “Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, pp.705-726.

Bonanno, G. and Haworth (1998), B., Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovations, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, pp. 495-510, 1998.

Elberfeld, W. and Nti, K. O. (2004), “Oligopolistic competition and new technology adoption under uncertainty”, Journal of Economics, 82, pp. 105-121.

Filippini, L. (2005), “Licensing contract in a Stackelberg model”, The Manchester School, 73, pp. 582-598.

Hattori, M. and Y. Tanaka (2014), “Incentive for adoption of new technology in duopoly under absolute and relative profit maximization”, Economics Bulletin, 34. pp. 2051-2059.

Hattori, M. and Tanaka, Y. (2015), “Subsidy or tax policy for new technology adoption in duopoly with quadratic and linear cost functions”, Economics Bulletin, 35, pp. 1423-1433.

Kabiraj, T. (2004), “Patent licensing in a leadership structure”, The Manchester School, 72, pp.188-205.

Kamien, T. and Tauman, Y. (1986), “Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, pp.471-492.

Katz, M. and Shapiro, C. (1985), “On the licensing of innovations”, Rand Journal of Economics, 16, pp. 504-520.

La Manna M. (1993), “Asymmetric Oligopoly and Technology Transfers”, Economic Journal, 103, pp.436-443.

Matsumura, T., Matsushima, N. and Cato, S. (2013), “Competitiveness and R&D competition revisited”, Economic modelling, 31, pp.541-547.

Mussa, M. and Rosen, S. (1978), “Monopoly and product quality”, Journal of Economic Theory, 18, pp. 130-156, 1978.

Pal, R. (2010), “Technology adoption in a differentiated duopoly: Cournot versus Bertrand”, Research in Economics, 64, pp. 128-136.

Rebolledo, M. and J. Sandonís (2012), “The effectiveness of R&D subsidies”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 21, pp. 815-825.

Sen, D. and Tauman, Y. (2007), “General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing Innovation”, Games and Economic Behavior, 59, pp.163-186.

Tanaka, Y. (2001), “Profitability of price and quantity strategies in a duopoly with vertical product differentiation”, Economic Theory, 17, pp.693-700.

Wang, X. H. and Yang, B. Z. (2004), “On technology licensing in a Stackelberg duopoly”, Australian Economic Papers, 43, pp. 448-458.

Watanabe N. and Muto, S. (2008), “Stable profit sharing in a patent licensing game: general bargaining outcomes”, International Journal of Game Theory, 37, pp.505-523.

Zhang, Y., Mei, S. and Zhong, W. (2014), “New technology adoption in a Cournot oligopoly with spillovers”, Journal of Economics, 112, pp. 115-136.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-23

How to Cite

Hattori, M., & Tanaka, Y. (2016). License or entry with vertical differentiation in duopoly. Economics and Business Letters, 5(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.5.1.2016.17-29

Issue

Section

Articles