The effect of renewable energy use and economic growth on pollution in the EUROZONE


  • Panagiotis Nikolaos Fotis Hellenic Competition Commission
  • Victoria Pekka Department of Business Administration; University of Pireaus; Greece



The aim of this paper is to empirically examine the effect of renewable energy use and economic growth on pollution within EUROZONE from 2005 to 2013 by utilizing Dynamic Panel Generalized Method of Moments approaches. The empirical results reveal that economic growth positively affects environmental pollutants. The use of renewable sources of energy negatively affects pollution. The more the renewable energy we use the less the air pollution. However, energy saving and energy intensity contribute to more air pollution.


Ajmi, A.N., Hammoudeh, S., Nguyen, K.N. and Sato, J.R. (2015) A new look at the relation-ships between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and income in G7 countries: the importance of time variations, Energy Economics, 49, 629–638.

Anastasia, V. (2015) The casual relationship between GDP, exports, energy consumption and CO2in Tayland and Malaysia, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 37-48.

Apergis, N. (2016) Environmental Kuznets Curves: New evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions, Energy Economics, 54, 263-271.

Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations, Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.

Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995) Another look at the Instrumental variable estimation of Error Component Models, Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.

Azomahou, T., Laisney, F. and Van Phu, N. (2006) Economic development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach, Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1347–1363.

Baltagi, H.B. and Kao, C. (2001) Nonstationary Panels, Cointegration in Panels and Dynamic Panels: A Survey, in Baltagi, B.H., Fomby, T.B. and Hill, R.C. (Eds.): Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels. Volume 15, Emerald Insight, pp. 7-51.

Banerjee, A. (1999) Panel Unit Root Tests and Cointegration: An Overview, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 607-629.

Baycan, O.I. (2013 Air Pollution, Economic Growth, and the European Union Enlargement, International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(12), 121-126.

Bernard, J-T., Gavin, M. Khalaf, L. and Voia, M. (2014) Environmental Kuznets Curve: Tipping Points, Uncertainty and Weak Identification, Environmental and Resource Econom-ics, 60(2), 285-315.

Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998) Initial restrictions and moment rstrictions in dynamic panel data models, Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143.

Breitung, J. (2000) The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data, in B. Baltagi (ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, Amsterdam, 161-178.

Choi, I. (2001) Unit root tests for panel data, Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272.

Christopoulos, D.K. and Tsionas, E.G. (2003) A Reassessment of Balance of Payments Constrained Growth: Results from Panel Unit Root and Panel Cointegration tests, Interna-tional Economic Journal, 7, 39 – 54.

Dinda, S. (2004) Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey, Ecological Economics. 49, 431-455.

Fotis, P., Karkalakos, S. and Asteriou, D. (2017). The relationship between energy demand and real GDP growth rate: the role of price asymmetries and spatial externalities within 34 countries across the globe, Energy Economics, 66, 69-84.

Galeotti, M., Manera, M. and Lanza, A. (2009) On the Robustness of Robustness Checks of the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis, Environmental and Resource Economics, 42, 551-574.

Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. (1995) Economic Growth and the Environment, Quarter-ly Journal of Economics, 110, 353-377.

Harris, D.F. Tzavalis, E. (1999) Inferences for unit roots for dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed, Journal of Econometrics, 91(2), 201-226.

Holtz-Eakin, D. and Selten, T.M. (1995) Stoking the fires: CO2 emissions and Economic Growth, Journal of Public Economics, 57, 85-101.

Im, K. Pesaran, M.H. Shin, Y. (2003) Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.

Istaiteyeh, R.M.S. (2016) Casuality Analysis between Electricity consumption and Real GDP: Evidence from Jordan, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 526-540.

Iwata, H., Okada, K. and Samreth, S. (2011) A note on the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2: a pooled mean group approach, Applied Energy, 88, 1986–1996

Johansen, S. (1992) Cointegration in partial systems and the efficiency of single-equation analysis, Journal of Econometrics, 52, 389-402.

Kalaysi, S. and Koksal, C. (2015) The relationship between China’s Airway Freight in Terms of Carbon-Dioxide Emission and Export Volume, International Journal of Economic Per-spectives, 9(4), 60-68.

Kapusuzoglou, A. (2014) Casuality relationships between carbon dioxide emissions and eco-nomic growth: Results from a multi-country study, International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 5-15.

Kuznets, S. (1955) Economic growth and income inequality, American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

López-Menéndez, A., Pérez, R. and Moreno, B. (2014) Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Journal of Environmental Ma-agement, 145, 368-373.

Maddala, G.S. and Wu, S. (1999) A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests With Panel Data and a New Simple Test, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631–652.

Markandya, A., Golub, A. and Pedroso-Galinato, S. (2006) Empirical Analysis of National Income and SO2 Emissions in Selected European Countries, Environmental and Resource Economics, 35, 221-257.

Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Bengochea-Morancho, A. and Morales-Lage, R. (2007) The impact of population on CO2 emissions: evidence from European countries, Environmental and Re-source Economics, 38, 597-512.

Mazur, A., Phutkaradze, Z. and Phutkaradze, J. (2015) Economic Growth and Environmental Quality in the European Union Countries – Is there Evidence for the Environmental Kuznets Curve?, International Journal of Management and Economics, 45, 108-126.

Marrero, A.G. (2010) Greenhouse gases emissions, growth and the Energy mix in Europe, Energy Economics, 32, 1356-1363.

Panayotou, T. (2000) Economic Growth and the Environment, CID Working Paper No. 56, Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development at Harvard University.

Panayotou, T. (1995) Environmental degradation at Different stages of Economic Development, in Iftikhar, A. and Doeleman, A.J. (Eds.): Beyond Rio: The Environmental Crisis and Sustainable livelihoods in the Third World, ILO Study Series New York: St. Martin’s Press, 13-36.

Polemis, L.M. (2016) New evidence on the impact of structural reforms on electricity sector performance, Energy Policy, 92, 420-431.

Polemis, L.M. and Dagoumas, S.A. (2013) The Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus: Evidence from Greece, Energy Policy, 62, 798-808.

Polemis, L.M. and Fotis, P. (2013) Do gasoline prices respond asymmetrically in the euro zone area? Evidence from cointegrated panel data analysis, Energy Policy, 56, 425-433.

Richmond, A. and Kaufmann, R. (2006) Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions?, Ecological Economics, 56, 176–189.

Rodriguez, M., Pena-Boguete, Y. and Pardo-Fernardez, J.C. (2016). Revisiting Environmental Kuznets Curves through the energy price lens, Energy Policy, 95, 32-41.

Sephton, P. and Mann, J. (2016) Compelling Evidence of an Environmental Kuznets Curve in the United Kingdom, Environmental and Resource Economics, 64(2), 301–315.

Sephton, P. and Mann, J. (2013) Further evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Spain, Energy Economics, 36, 177–181.

Stern, D.I. (2014) The environmental Kuznets curve: A primer, Centre for Climate Economic & Policy, Working Paper, 1404.




How to Cite

Fotis, P. N., & Pekka, V. (2017). The effect of renewable energy use and economic growth on pollution in the EUROZONE. Economics and Business Letters, 6(3), 88–99.