Bloated balance sheets and stock returns: Asymmetries between profit and loss firms
We study return predictability attributable to bloated balance sheets in European capital markets and find that the NOA anomaly is more severe across loss firms and is significantly attenuated across profit firms. A hedge trading strategy on NOA for loss firms generate large raw and abnormal returns that are almost three times higher than the respective returns for profit firms. Our evidence is more likely to be consistent with the hypothesis that low NOA firms may have superior returns relative to high NOA firms due to investors’ inability to make full use of information reported in financial statements.
Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 3-37.
Chan, L., Dimmock, S., Lakonishok, J. 2009. Benchmarking Money Manager Performance: Issues and Evidence, Review of Financial Studies, 22, 4553-4599.
Grobys, K. 2014. Momentum in global equity markets in times of troubles: Does the economic state matter? Economic Letters 123, 100-103.
Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 125–153.
Hirshleifer, D., Hou, K., Teoh, S., Zhang Y. 2004. Do investors overvalue firms with bloated balance sheets? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 38, 297-331.
Hirshleifer, D., Hou, K., Teoh, S. 2012. The accrual anomaly: Risk or mispricing? Management Science, 58, 320-335.
Papanastasopoulos, G., Thomakos, D. 2017. Managerial discretion, net operating assets and the cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from European countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 47, 188-210.
Patatoukas, P. 2016. Asymmetrically timely loss recognition and the accrual anomaly. Abacus, 52, 166-175.
Pinnuck, M., Shekhar. C. 2013. The Profit versus Loss Heuristic and Firm Financing Decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38, 420-439.
Schleicher, T., Hussainey, K., Walker, M. 2007. Loss firms’ annual report narratives and share price anticipation of earnings. The British Accounting Review, 39, 153–171.
Wu. J., Zhang, L., Zhang, F. 2010. The q-theory approach to understanding the accrual anomaly. Journal of Accounting Research, 48, 177-223.
How to Cite
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Oviedo University Press (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Ediuno. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo / Oviedo University Press
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derives 3.0 Spain (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work), ii) they are not used for commercial purposes, iii) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. The author can archive the post-print version of the article (publisher’s version) on the author’s personal website and/or on the web of the institution where he belong, including a link to the page of the journal and putting the way of citation of the work. Economics and Business Letters and its URL https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/index are the only authorized source for correctly giving the reference of the publisher’s version in every mention of the article.