The optimal structure of lotto games

Authors

  • Orrin David Gulley Bentley University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.7.4.2018.156-161

Abstract

Operators of state-owned lottery games generally attempt to set the parameters of the game(s) to maximize revenue to the state. This paper discusses the state of the literature on how to set the parameters of a lotto game so as to accomplish this objective.

Author Biography

Orrin David Gulley, Bentley University

Economics

References

Beenstock, Michael, and Yoel Haitovsky. 2001. “Lottomania and Other Anomalies in the Market for Lotto.” Journal of Economic Psychology 22 (Dec.): 721-744.

Cook, Philip J., and Charles T. Clotfelter. 1993. The Peculiar Scale Economies of Lotto.” The American Economic Review 83 (June): 634-643.

Forrest, David, and Gulley, O. David. 2018a. “New Price, New Hope? An Examination of the Effects of Doubling the Ticket Price in UK Lotto.” Journal of Gambling Studies 34 (March): 39-53.

Forrest, David, and Gulley, O. David. 2018b. “Lengthening the Odds: The Effect on Sales of Making a Lotto Game Harder to Win.” Manuscript.

Forrest, David, Gulley, O. David, and Robert Simmons. 2004. “Substitution between Games in the UK

National Lottery.” Applied Economics 36 (7): 645-51.

Forrest, David, Robert Simmons, and Neil Chesters. 2002 “Buying a Dream: Alternative Models of Demand for Lotto.” Economic Inquiry 40 (July): 485-496.

Forrest, David, and Ian McHale. 2007. “The Relationship Between a National and a Multistate Lotto Game.” Journal of Gambling Business and Economics 1(Nov.): 207-216.

Forrest, David, and Levi Perez. 2011. “Own and Cross-Price Elasticities for Games within a State Lottery Portfolio.” Economic Inquiry 29 (Oct.): 536-549.

Forrest, David, Levi Perez, and Rose Baker. 2010. “Evaluating the Effects of Game Design on Lotto Sales: A Case Study from Spain.” Journal of Gambling Business and Economics 4 (2):1-20.

Garret, Thomas A., and Russell S. Sobel. 1999. “Gamblers Favor Skewness, Not Risk: Further Evidence from United States’ Lottery Games.” Economics Letters 63 (April): 85-90.

Grote, Kent R., and Victor A. Matheson. 2006. “Dueling Jackpots: Are Competing Lotto Games Complements or Substitutes?” Atlantic Economic Journal 34 (Feb.): 85-100.

Grote, Kent R. and Victor A Matheson. 2011. "The Economics of Lotteries: A Survey of the Literature" Economics Department Working Papers. Paper 16. https://crossworks.holycross.edu/econ_working_papers/16

Gulley, O. David and Frank A Scott, Jr. 1993. “The Demand for Wagering on State-Operated Lotto Games.” National Tax Journal 46 (March):13-22.

Hartley, Roger, and Gauthier Lanot. 2003. “On the Design of Lottery Games.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 54 (1): 89-100.

Knight, Brian, and Nathan Schiff. 2012. “Spatial Competition and Cross-Border Shopping: Evidence from State Lotteries.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4 (Nov.): 199-229.

Lin, Chin-Tsai, and Chien-Hua Lai. 2006. “Substitute Effects Between Lotto and Big Lotto in Taiwan.” Applied Economics Letters 13 (Feb.): 655-658.

Quiggin, John. 1991. “On the Optimal Design of Lotteries.” Economica 58 (Feb.): 1-16.

Stover, Mark E. 1990. “Contiguous State Lotteries: Substitutes or Complements?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9 (4): 565-568.

Walker, Ian. 1998. “The Economic Analysis of Lotteries.” Economic Policy 13 (27): 359-92.

Walker, Ian, and Juliet Young. 2001. “An Economist’s Guide to Lottery Design.” Economic Journal 111: F700-722.

Downloads

Published

23-11-2018

How to Cite

Gulley, O. D. (2018). The optimal structure of lotto games. Economics and Business Letters, 7(4), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.7.4.2018.156-161