The optimal structure of lotto games
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.7.4.2018.156-161Abstract
Operators of state-owned lottery games generally attempt to set the parameters of the game(s) to maximize revenue to the state. This paper discusses the state of the literature on how to set the parameters of a lotto game so as to accomplish this objective.
References
Beenstock, Michael, and Yoel Haitovsky. 2001. “Lottomania and Other Anomalies in the Market for Lotto.” Journal of Economic Psychology 22 (Dec.): 721-744.
Cook, Philip J., and Charles T. Clotfelter. 1993. The Peculiar Scale Economies of Lotto.” The American Economic Review 83 (June): 634-643.
Forrest, David, and Gulley, O. David. 2018a. “New Price, New Hope? An Examination of the Effects of Doubling the Ticket Price in UK Lotto.” Journal of Gambling Studies 34 (March): 39-53.
Forrest, David, and Gulley, O. David. 2018b. “Lengthening the Odds: The Effect on Sales of Making a Lotto Game Harder to Win.” Manuscript.
Forrest, David, Gulley, O. David, and Robert Simmons. 2004. “Substitution between Games in the UK
National Lottery.” Applied Economics 36 (7): 645-51.
Forrest, David, Robert Simmons, and Neil Chesters. 2002 “Buying a Dream: Alternative Models of Demand for Lotto.” Economic Inquiry 40 (July): 485-496.
Forrest, David, and Ian McHale. 2007. “The Relationship Between a National and a Multistate Lotto Game.” Journal of Gambling Business and Economics 1(Nov.): 207-216.
Forrest, David, and Levi Perez. 2011. “Own and Cross-Price Elasticities for Games within a State Lottery Portfolio.” Economic Inquiry 29 (Oct.): 536-549.
Forrest, David, Levi Perez, and Rose Baker. 2010. “Evaluating the Effects of Game Design on Lotto Sales: A Case Study from Spain.” Journal of Gambling Business and Economics 4 (2):1-20.
Garret, Thomas A., and Russell S. Sobel. 1999. “Gamblers Favor Skewness, Not Risk: Further Evidence from United States’ Lottery Games.” Economics Letters 63 (April): 85-90.
Grote, Kent R., and Victor A. Matheson. 2006. “Dueling Jackpots: Are Competing Lotto Games Complements or Substitutes?” Atlantic Economic Journal 34 (Feb.): 85-100.
Grote, Kent R. and Victor A Matheson. 2011. "The Economics of Lotteries: A Survey of the Literature" Economics Department Working Papers. Paper 16. https://crossworks.holycross.edu/econ_working_papers/16
Gulley, O. David and Frank A Scott, Jr. 1993. “The Demand for Wagering on State-Operated Lotto Games.” National Tax Journal 46 (March):13-22.
Hartley, Roger, and Gauthier Lanot. 2003. “On the Design of Lottery Games.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 54 (1): 89-100.
Knight, Brian, and Nathan Schiff. 2012. “Spatial Competition and Cross-Border Shopping: Evidence from State Lotteries.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4 (Nov.): 199-229.
Lin, Chin-Tsai, and Chien-Hua Lai. 2006. “Substitute Effects Between Lotto and Big Lotto in Taiwan.” Applied Economics Letters 13 (Feb.): 655-658.
Quiggin, John. 1991. “On the Optimal Design of Lotteries.” Economica 58 (Feb.): 1-16.
Stover, Mark E. 1990. “Contiguous State Lotteries: Substitutes or Complements?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 9 (4): 565-568.
Walker, Ian. 1998. “The Economic Analysis of Lotteries.” Economic Policy 13 (27): 359-92.
Walker, Ian, and Juliet Young. 2001. “An Economist’s Guide to Lottery Design.” Economic Journal 111: F700-722.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Oviedo University Press (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Ediuno. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo / Oviedo University Press
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derives 3.0 Spain (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work), ii) they are not used for commercial purposes, iii) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. The author can archive the post-print version of the article (publisher’s version) on the author’s personal website and/or on the web of the institution where he belong, including a link to the page of the journal and putting the way of citation of the work. Economics and Business Letters and its URL https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/index are the only authorized source for correctly giving the reference of the publisher’s version in every mention of the article.