The role of complementarity of goods in a mixed bundling strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.9.1.2020.31-40Abstract
This paper studies optimal pricing when a monopolist firm produces two complementary goods and may undertake a bundling strategy. To do so, a modified version of Yan and Bandyopadhyay’s (2011) framework is used, in which the efficacy of the bundling strategy depends positively on the degree of complementarity of goods. Two main results are obtained. First, mixed bundling turns out to be the optimal strategy for the firm, since it yields higher profits than pure unbundling and pure bundling. Second, sales and profits from the bundling (unbundling) strategy increase (decrease) as the products become more complementary, which entails an empirically sensible behavior.
References
Adams, W. J. and Yellen, J. L. (1976). Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(3), 475-498.
Bakos, Y. and Brynjolfsson, E. (1999). Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Science, 45(12), 1613-1630.
Čavlek, N. (2006). Travel and tourism intermediaries. In Dwyer, L. and Forsyth, P. (Eds.): International Handbook on the Economics of Tourism. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, 155-172.
Carbajo, J., De Meza, D. and Seidmann, D.J. (1990). A strategic motivation for commodity bundling. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(1), 283-298.
Danaher, B., Huang, Y., Smith and M.D., Telang, R. (2014). An empirical analysis of digital music bundling strategies. Management Science, 60(6), 1413-1433.
Estelami, H. (1999). Consumer savings in complementary product bundles. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 107-114.
Goodrich, J.N. (1977). Benefit bundle analysis: An empirical study of international travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 16(2), 6–9.
Guiltinan, J.P. (1987). The price bundling of services: A normative framework. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 74-85.
Gupta, S. and Loulou, R. (1998). Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: Strategic incentives in a duopoly. Marketing Science, 17(4), 301-316.
Koschat, M. A. and Putsis Jr., W.P. (2002). Audience characteristics and bundling: A hedonic analysis of magazine advertising rates. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 262-273.
Matutes, C. and Regibeau, P. (1992). Compatibility and bundling of complementary goods in a duopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics, 40(1), 37-54.
McAfee, R.P., McMillan J. and Whinston, M.D. (1989). Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(2), 371-383.
Mulhern, F.J. and Leone, R.P. (1991). Implicit price bundling of retail products: A multiproduct approach to maximizing store profitability. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 63-76.
O’Connell, J.F. and Bouquet, A. (2015). Dynamic packaging spells the end of European charter airlines. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 21(2), 175-189.
Palfrey, T.R. (1983). Bundling decisions by a multiproduct monopolist with incomplete information. Econometrica, 51(2), 463-483.
Pierce, B. and Winter, H. (1996). Pure vs. mixed commodity bundling. Review of Industrial Organization, 11(6), 811-821.
Schmalensee, R. (1984). Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. Journal of Business, 57(1), S211-S230.
Srinuan, P., Srinuan, C. and Bohlin, E. (2014). An empirical analysis of multiple services and choices of consumer in the Swedish telecommunications market. Telecommunications Policy, 38(5-6), 449-459.
Stahl, F. and Maass, W. (2004). Strategies for selling paid content on newspaper and magazine web sites: An empirical analysis of bundling and splitting of news and magazine articles. International Journal on Media Management, 6(1-2), 59-66.
Stremersch, S. and Tellis, G.J. (2002). Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 55-72.
Venkatesh, R. and Kamakura, W. (2003). Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: Contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products. The Journal of Business, 76(2), 211-231.
Yan, R. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (2011). The profit benefits of bundle pricing of complementary products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18(4), 355-361.
Yan, R., Myers, C., Wang, J. and Ghose, S. (2014). Bundling products to success: The influence of complementarity and advertising. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(1), 48-53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Oviedo University Press (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Ediuno. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo / Oviedo University Press
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derives 3.0 Spain (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work), ii) they are not used for commercial purposes, iii) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. The author can archive the post-print version of the article (publisher’s version) on the author’s personal website and/or on the web of the institution where he belong, including a link to the page of the journal and putting the way of citation of the work. Economics and Business Letters and its URL https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/index are the only authorized source for correctly giving the reference of the publisher’s version in every mention of the article.
