A closer look at entrepreneurial intentions
This paper tests the initial Shapero-Sokol model of an entrepreneurial event, as well as expands it through the use of quadratic and moderating effects. Structural equation modelling is applied to a sample of undergraduate students in Croatia that completed a questionnaire in 2019. Findings show that perceived desirability and perceived feasibility have a positive impact on entrepreneurial intentions, whereas the propensity to act has a negative effect. A closer look reveals that there are other significant effects in the model as well. Quadratic effect is positive for perceived desirability and perceived feasibility, while negative for propensity to act. Lastly, perceived feasibility positively moderates the relations for both perceived desirability and propensity to act on entrepreneurial intentions.
Bateman, T. S. and Crant, J. M. (1993) The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
Bernoster, I., Rietveld, C., Thurik, A. and Torrès, O. (2018) Overconfidence, Optimism and Entrepreneurship, Sustainability, 10(7), 2233.
Busenitz, L. W. and Barney, J. B. (1997) Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making, Journal of Busi-ness Venturing, 12(1), 9-30.
Chung-Yan, G. A. and Butler, A. M. (2011) Proactive personality in the context of job com-plexity, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 43(4), 279-286.
Erikson, T. (2001) Revisiting Shapero: A taxonomy of entrepreneurial typologies, New Eng-land Journal of Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 9-14.
Esfandiar, K., Sharifi-Tehrani, M., Pratt, S. and Altinay, L. (2019) Understanding entrepre-neurial intentions: A developed integrated structural model approach, Journal of Business Research, 94, 172-182.
Fitzsimmons, J. R. and Douglas, E. J. (2011) Interaction between feasibility and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions, Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 431- 440.
Grant, A. M. and Schwartz, B. (2011) Too Much of a Good Thing: The Challenge and Op-portunity of the Inverted U, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 61-76.
Herzberg, F. (1966) Work and the nature of man, Crowell: New York.
Jenkins, G. D. and Taber, T. D. (1977) A Monte Carlo study of factors affecting three indices of composite scale reliability, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 392-398.
Krueger, N. (2009) Entrepreneurial Intentions are Dead: Long Live Entrepreneurial Inten-tions. In Carsrud, A. L. and Brännback, M. (Eds.): Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind, Springer: New York, 51-72.
Krueger, N. F. and Kickul, J. (2006) So You Thought the Intentions Model Was Simple? Cognitive Style and the Specification of Entrepreneurial Intentions Models, SSRN Elec-tronic Journal.
Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D. and Carsrud, A. L. (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions, Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M. and Nielsen, I. (2019) Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, meas-urement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research, Journal of Voca-tional Behavior, 110, 403-419.
Phillips, J., Gully, S. M. and McCarthy, J. E. (2012) The Role of Proactive Personality, Goal Orientation & Self-Efficacy in Goal Setting & Performance, Academy of Management Pro-ceedings, 2012(1), 15993.
Pierce, J. R. and Aguinis, H. (2013) The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect in Management, Journal of Management, 39(2), 313-338.
Ranga, V., Jain, S. and Venkateswarlu (2019) Exploration of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Management Students Using Shapero’s Model, Theoretical Economics Letters, 9(4), 959-972.
Shapero, A. and Sokol, L. (1982) Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In Kent, C., Sexton,
D. and Vesper, K. (Eds.): The encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Prentice-Hall: Eng-lewood Cliffs, 72-90.
Zhao, H. and Seibert, S. E. (2006) The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259-271.
How to Cite
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Oviedo University Press (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Ediuno. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo / Oviedo University Press
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derives 3.0 Spain (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work), ii) they are not used for commercial purposes, iii) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. The author can archive the post-print version of the article (publisher’s version) on the author’s personal website and/or on the web of the institution where he belong, including a link to the page of the journal and putting the way of citation of the work. Economics and Business Letters and its URL https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/index are the only authorized source for correctly giving the reference of the publisher’s version in every mention of the article.