Chasing returns with high-beta stocks: evidence from tax-privileged mutual funds in Thailand

Authors

  • Roongkiat Ratanabanchuen Chulalongkorn Business School
  • Kanis Saengchote Chulalongkorn Business School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.10.1.2021.37-44

Keywords:

high-beta stocks, mutual funds, low-beta anomaly

Abstract

One proposed explanation for the low-beta anomaly – a puzzling finding that stocks with low systematic risk tend to earn higher returns than the CAPM predicts and vice versa – is that mutual funds drive up demand for high-beta stocks, leading to systematic mispricing. We find evidence that Thai equity mutual funds tend to alter their risk exposure in response to fund flows, but only for incentivized funds where investors receive immediate tax benefits. We argue that the benefits change the way investors make their decisions, raising an issue of how public policies may have unintended consequences in capital markets.

References

Arif, S., Ben-Rephael, A., & Lee, C. (2015). Do short-sellers profit from mutual funds? evidence from daily trades. Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University Working Paper, 195.

Badding, K. D., Stephenson, E. F., & Yeoh, M. M. (2012). Health-care reform and bankruptcy: evidence from Massachusetts. Applied Economics Letters, 19(17), 1741-1744.

Baker, M., Bradley, B., & Wurgler, J. (2011). Benchmarks as limits to arbitrage: Understanding the low-volatility anomaly. Financial Analysts Journal, 67(1), 40-54.

Black, F. (1972). Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. The Journal of Business, 45(3), 444-455.

Boguth, O., & Simutin, M. (2018). Leverage constraints and asset prices: Insights from mutual fund risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 127(2), 325–341.

Brown, K. C., Harlow, W. V., & Starks, L. T. (1996). Of tournaments and temptations: An analysis of managerial incentives in the mutual fund industry. The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 85-110.

Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1997). Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 105(6), 1167-1200.

Christoffersen, S. E., & Simutin, M. (2017). On the demand for high-beta stocks: Evidence from mutual funds. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(8), 2596-2620.

Frazzini, A. and L. H. Pedersen (2014). Betting against beta. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 1–25.

Gallet, C. A. (2013). Tobacco control and obesity: evidence from a cross section of countries. Applied Economics Letters, 20(1), 80-83.

Ha, Y., & Ko, K. (2017). Why do fund managers increase risk?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 78, 108-116.

Huang, J., Wei, K. D., & Yan, H. (2007). Participation costs and the sensitivity of fund flows to past performance. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1273-1311.

Muthitacharoen, A. (2017). Five new perspectives from Thai tax returns. PIER aBRIDGEd, 19.

O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2015). Present bias: Lessons learned and to be learned. American Economic Review, 105(5), 273-79.

Sirri, E. R., & Tufano, P. (1998). Costly search and mutual fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1589-1622.

Stambaugh, R. F., Yu, J., & Yuan, Y. (2012). The short of it: Investor sentiment and anomalies. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(2), 288-302.

Stambaugh, R. F., Yu, J., & Yuan, Y. (2015). Arbitrage asymmetry and the idiosyncratic volatility puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 70(5), 1903-1948.

Virabhak, S., & Sohn, W. (2009). The impact of Medicaid's preferred drug lists on physicians' prescribing behaviour. Applied Economics, 41(21), 2705-2725.

Downloads

Published

21-02-2021

How to Cite

Ratanabanchuen, R., & Saengchote, K. (2021). Chasing returns with high-beta stocks: evidence from tax-privileged mutual funds in Thailand. Economics and Business Letters, 10(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.10.1.2021.37-44

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2021): March

Section

Articles

License

The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:

1. Oviedo University Press (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.

© Ediuno. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo / Oviedo University Press

2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derives 3.0 Spain (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work), ii) they are not used for commercial purposes, iii) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.

3. Conditions of self-archiving. The author can archive the post-print version of the article (publisher’s version) on the author’s personal website and/or on the web of  the institution where he belong, including a link to the page of the journal and putting the way of citation of the work. Economics and Business Letters and its URL https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/index are the only authorized source for correctly giving the reference of the publisher’s version in every mention of the article.