Who gains from economic freedom? A panel analysis on decile income levels
This paper revisits Saccone’s (2020) analysis of the impact of economic freedom on decile income shares for a panel of developed and developing nations during 1980-2014. Saccone found that higher levels of economic freedom corresponded with lower income shares for the bottom 8 deciles and higher shares only for the top 2 deciles. Instead of decile income shares, this paper focuses on the impact of economic freedom on decile income levels. We find that the income per capita for all 10 deciles increases as economic freedom increases.
Costanza, R., I. Kubiszewski, E. Gionvannini, H. Lovins, J. McGlade, K. E. Pickett, K. V. Ragnarsdóttir, D. Roberts, R. De Vogli, and R. Wilkinson. 2014. Development: Time to leave GDP behind. Nature 505, 283-85.
Dollar, D. and A. Kraay. 2002. Growth is good for the poor.” Journal of Economic Growth 7(3), 195-225.
Gwartney, J., R. Lawson, J. Hall. R. Murphy. 2019. Economic Freedom of the World: 2019 Annual Report. Fraser Institute: Vancouver.
Kahneman, D. and A. Deaton. 2010. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences 107(38), 16489-93.
Krueger, A. B. 2003. Inequality, too much of a good thing. In Heckman, J. J. and A. B. Krueger (eds.) Inequality in America: What Role for Human Capital Policies? MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1-76.
McAuliffe, M., A. Kitimbo, A. Goosens, A. A. Ullah. 2017. Understanding migration journeys from migrants’ perspectives” in World Migration Report 2018. International Organization for Migration: Geneva.
Memoli, M. A. 2016. As Democrats ponder their future, Joe Biden makes a plea for a focus on the middle class.” Los Angeles Times, December 22, 2016. Accessed online: June 29, 2020.
Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Saccone, D. 2020. Who gains from economic freedom? A panel analysis on decile income shares.” Applied Economics Letters.
Schuppert, F. 2012. Suffering from social inequality: Normative implications of empirical research on the effects of inequality.” Philosophical Topics 40(1), 97-115.
Stevenson, B. and J. Wolfers. 2013. Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation?” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 103(3), 598-604.
Stiglitz, J. E. 2012. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W. W. Norton & Co.: New York.
United Nations. 2019. Human Development Report 2019. United Nations Development Programme: New York.
Wilkinson, R. and K. Pickett. 2009. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Always Do Better. Penguin Books: London.
How to Cite
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Oviedo University Press (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Ediuno. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo / Oviedo University Press
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derives 3.0 Spain (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work), ii) they are not used for commercial purposes, iii) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. The author can archive the post-print version of the article (publisher’s version) on the author’s personal website and/or on the web of the institution where he belong, including a link to the page of the journal and putting the way of citation of the work. Economics and Business Letters and its URL https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/index are the only authorized source for correctly giving the reference of the publisher’s version in every mention of the article.