Does offshoring boost productivity? A comparison of SMEs and large firms for Germany

Authors

  • Fabian Kreutzer Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences, Germany
  • Wolfram Berger ICN Business School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.11.2.2022.46-52

Keywords:

offshoring, SME, productivity, difference-in-difference analysis, Germany

Abstract

We use plant-level evidence for Germany to explore the productivity effects of offshoring of small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) and compare them to those derived for a sample of large companies. SMEs usually face tighter resource constraints than larger companies, thus making it harder for them to reap the potential productivity gains associated with offshoring. We find evidence for the group of SMEs that plants that offshore business activities tend to be among the more productive ones, ex ante. However, offshoring plants lose this edge over their non-offshoring counterparts. The initial productivity gap is reversed, and the productivity of offshoring plants lags behind even several years after offshoring has actually taken place. Neither observation can be confirmed for large companies.

References

Adler, G., R. Duval, D. Furceri, S. Celik, K. Koloskova and M. Poblawski-Ribeiro (2017), Gone with the headwinds: global productivity, IMF Staff Discussion Note 17/04, Interna-tional Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

Acs, Z., R. Morck, J. Shaver and B. Yeung (1997), The internationalization of small and me-dium-sized enterprises: a policy perspective, Small Business Economics 9, 7-20.

Amiti, M. and S. Wei (2009), Service offshoring and productivity: Evidence from the US, The World Economy 32, 203–220.

Ellguth, P., S. Kohaut and I. Möller (2014), The IAB establishment panel - methodological essentials and data quality, Journal for Labour Market Research 47, 27–41.

Görg, H. and A. Hanley (2004), Does outsourcing increase profitability?, Economic and So-cial Review 35, 267-288.

Grossman and Helpman (2002), Integration versus outsourcing in industry equilibrium, Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 85–120.

Heckman, J., H. Ichimura and P. Todd (1997), Matching as an econometric evaluation esti-mator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme, Review of Economic Studies 64, 605–654.

Hollenstein, H. (2005), Determinants of international activities: are SMEs different?, Small Business Economics 24, 431–450.

Moser, C., D. Urban and B. Weder di Mauro (2015), On the heterogeneous employment ef-fects of offshoring: identifying productivity and downsizing channels, Economic Inquiry 53, 220–39.

Naghavi, A. and G. Ottaviano (2009), Offshoring and product innovation, Economic Theory 38, 517–532.

Rosenbaum, P., and D. Rubin (1983), The central role of the propensity score in observa-tional studies for causal effects, Biometrika 70, 41–55.

Smith, J. and P. Todd (2005), Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperi-mental estimators?, Journal of Econometrics 125, 305–353.

Waehrens, B., D. Slepniov and J. Johansen (2015), Offshoring practices of Danish and Swe-dish SMEs: effects on operations configuration, Production Planning & Control 26, 693–705.

Winkler, D. (2010), Services offshoring and its impact on productivity and employment: evidence from Germany, 1995–2006, The World Economy 33, 1672–1701.

Downloads

Published

18-04-2022

How to Cite

Kreutzer, F., & Berger, W. (2022). Does offshoring boost productivity? A comparison of SMEs and large firms for Germany. Economics and Business Letters, 11(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.11.2.2022.46-52

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022): June

Section

Articles

License

The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:

1. Oviedo University Press (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.

© Ediuno. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo / Oviedo University Press

2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derives 3.0 Spain (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work), ii) they are not used for commercial purposes, iii) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.

3. Conditions of self-archiving. The author can archive the post-print version of the article (publisher’s version) on the author’s personal website and/or on the web of  the institution where he belong, including a link to the page of the journal and putting the way of citation of the work. Economics and Business Letters and its URL https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/index are the only authorized source for correctly giving the reference of the publisher’s version in every mention of the article.