Examining the distance puzzle in the global coffee trade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.14.2.2025.88-94Keywords:
Gravity Model, coffee, transporation costs, distanceAbstract
We examine whether the impact of transportation costs originating from physical distance in the global coffee trade does not decrease over time (i.e., “the distance puzzle”) by applying a gravity model from 2009 to 2019. We also consider the effect of cultural distance stemming from colonial dependency, common colonizer, and common language. Our results reveal that transportation costs are initially stable but show a negative trend in the long run, particularly post-2015. Moreover, colonial dependency and common colonizers significantly increased the coffee trade.
References
Abafita, J., and Tadesse, T. (2021). Determinants of global coffee trade: Do RTAs matter? Gravity model analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1892925.
Anderson, J.E., and Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192.
Disdier, A.C., and Head, K. (2008). The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 37-48.
Hummels, D. (2007). Transportation costs and international trade in the second era of globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 131-154.
Mussatto, S.I., Machado, E.M., Martins, S., and Teixeira, J.A. (2011). Production, composition, and application of coffee and its industrial residues. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 4, 661-672.
Ramsey, J.B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 31(2), 350-371.
Silva, J.S., and Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658.
World Trade Organization (2013, April 10). Trade to remain subdued in 2013 after sluggish growth in 2012 as European economies continue to struggle [Press Release], available at
https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres13_e/pr688_e.pdf
World Trade Organization (2016). World Trade Statistical Review 2016, available at
https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2016_e/wts2016_e.pdf
Yotov, Y.V. (2012). A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade. Economics Letters, 117(3), 794-798.
Yotov, Y.V., Piermartini, R., and Larch, M. (2016). An advanced guide to trade policy analysis: The structural gravity model. WTO iLibrary.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Oviedo University Press (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Ediuno. Ediciones de la Universidad de Oviedo / Oviedo University Press
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Non Derives 3.0 Spain (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, publisher and URL of the work), ii) they are not used for commercial purposes, iii) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. The author can archive the post-print version of the article (publisher’s version) on the author’s personal website and/or on the web of the institution where he belong, including a link to the page of the journal and putting the way of citation of the work. Economics and Business Letters and its URL https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/EBL/index are the only authorized source for correctly giving the reference of the publisher’s version in every mention of the article.
