Adaptación Española de la Escala de Apoyo a la Desigualdad Económica (S-SEIS)
PDF (English)

Palabras clave

Attitudes toward inequality; Economic inequality; Spanish versión; Support for economic inequality; Validity Actitudes hacia la desigualdad; Desigualdad económica; Adaptación española; Apoyo a la desigualdad económica; Validez

Cómo citar

Montoya-Lozano, M., Moreno-Bella, E., García-Castro, J. D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2023). Adaptación Española de la Escala de Apoyo a la Desigualdad Económica (S-SEIS). Psicothema, 35(3). Recuperado a partir de


Antecedentes: La versión Española de la Escala de Apoyo a la Desigualdad Económica (S-SEIS) evalúa la tendencia de las personas a tener actitudes positivas hacia la desigualdad económica. Método: Se realizaron dos estudios correlacionales, uno exploratorio (N = 619) y otro confirmatorio (N = 562). Resultados: S-SEIS mostró una buena fiabilidad en los dos estudios. El análisis factorial mostró una estructura unifactorial en el Estudio 1 que se confirmó en el Estudio 2. Igualmente encontramos una relación entre S-SEIS y otras medidas de actitudes hacia la desigualdad ampliamente utilizadas, como la intolerancia hacia la desigualdad. S-SEIS correlaciona positivamente con la creencia en un mundo justo, la orientación hacia la dominancia social (SDO), la justificación del sistema económico (ESJ), la confianza institucional y la democracia percibida; correlaciona negativamente con la intolerancia hacia la desigualdad, la desigualdad percibida, la sociabilidad/competencia percibida de las personas en situación de pobreza y el apoyo a la redistribución. Conclusiones: Los hallazgos sugieren que la S-SEIS es una medida válida para evaluar el apoyo a la desigualdad económica en muestras españolas.

PDF (English)



Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017, August 8-10). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion [Paper presentation]. First International Conference on Applied & Industrial Mathematics and Statistics, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.

Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586-592.

Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4-5), 564-599.

Barreiro, A., Etchezahar, E., & Prado-Gascó, V. (2018). Psychometric properties of the personal and general belief in a just world scales in the Argentine context. Psykhe, 27(1), 1-10.

Bavetta, S., Li Donni, P., & Marino, M. (2019). An empirical analysis of the determinants of perceived inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 65(2), 264-292.

Benson, R., Duffy, B., Hesketh, R., & Hewlett, K. (2021). Attitudes to inequalities. IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities.

Blanchet, T., Chancel, L., & Gethin, A. (2019). How unequal is Europe? Evidence from distributional national accounts, 1980-2017 (Report No. N° 2019/06). World Inequality Database.

Castillo, J. C. (2011). Legitimacy of inequality in a highly unequal context: Evidence from the Chilean case. Social Justice Research, 24, 314–340.

Castillo, J. C., García-Castro, J. D., & Venegas, M. (2022). Perception of economic inequality: concepts, associated factors and prospects of a burgeoning research agenda. International Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 180-207.

Connor, P., Varney, J., Keltner, D., & Chen, S. (2021). Social class competence stereotypes are amplified by socially signaled economic inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 89–105.

Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the Personal Belief in a Just World Scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.

Davidai, S., & Ongis, M. (2019). The politics of zero-sum thinking: The relationship between political ideology and the belief that life is a zero-sum game. Science Advances, 5(12), eaay3761.

Delgado-Rico, E., Carretero-Dios, H., & Ruch, W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12(3), 449–460.

Durante, F., Bearns Tablante, C., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 131–150.

Durante, F., & Fiske, S. T. (2017). How social-class stereotypes maintain inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 43–48.

Durante, F., Fiske, S. T., Kervyn, N., Cuddy, A. J., Akande, A., Adetoun, B. E., Adewuyi, M. F., Tserere, M. M., Ramiah, A. A., Mastor, K. A., Barlow, F. K., Bonn, G., Tafarodi, R. W., Bosak, J., Cairns, E., Doherty, C., Capozza, D., Chandran, A., Chryssochoou, X., & Storari, C. C. (2013). Nations’ income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 726-746.

European Social Survey (2018). ESS Round 9 Source Questionnaire [Questionnaire]. Sikt - Norwegian Agency for Shared Services in Education and Research.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902.

Fiske, S. T., & Durante, F. (2019). Mutual status stereotypes maintain inequality. In J. Jetten & K. Peters (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Inequality (pp. 335–348). Springer.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

García-Castro, J. D., González, R., Frigolett, C., Jiménez-Moya, G., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. (2022). Changing attitudes toward redistribution: The role of perceived economic inequality in everyday life and intolerance of inequality. The Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication.

García-Castro, J. D., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Willis, G. (2020). Perceiving economic inequality in everyday life decreases tolerance to inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, Article 104019.

García-Castro, J. D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019). I know people who can and who cannot: A measure of the perception of economic inequality in everyday life. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 599-608.

García-Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Palacio Sañudo, J., David Polo, J., & Rentería Pérez, E. (2018). Perceptions of economic inequality and support for redistribution: The role of existential and utopian standards. Social Justice Research, 31(4), 335-354.

Goubin, S. (2018). Economic inequality, perceived responsiveness and political trust. Acta Politica, 55, 267-304.

Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM). SAGE. Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K.

Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & S. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

ISSP Research Group (2012). International Social Survey Programme 2009: Social Inequality IV-ISSP 2009 (Version 4.0.0.) [Questionnaire]. GESIS Data Archive.

Jaume, L., Etchezahar, E., & Cervone, N. (2012). La justificación del sistema económico y su relación con la orientación a la dominancia social [Justification of the economic system and its relationship with the social dominance orientation]. Boletín de Psicología, 106, 81-91.

Jylhä, K. M. (2016). Ideological roots of climate change denial: Resistance to change, acceptance of inequality, or both? [Doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis]. Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet.

Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.

Kaplan, D. (2009). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kiatpongsan, S., & Norton, M. I. (2014). How much (more) should CEOs make? A universal desire for more equal pay. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 587-593.

Krieckhaus, J., Son, B., Bellinger, N. M., & Wells, J. M. (2014). Economic inequality and democratic support. The Journal of Politics, 76(1), 139-151.

Krijnen, J., Ülkümen, G., Bogard, J., & Fox, C. R. (2021). Lay theories of financial well-being predict political and policy message preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 310-336.

Kuhn, A. (2019). The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 59, 331-344.

Linde, J. (2012). Why feed the hand that bites you? Perceptions of procedural fairness and system support in post‐communist democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 410-434.

Loveless, M. (2016, July 13-15). How individuals’ perceptions of inequality may affect their perceptions of corruption: A challenge to new democracies [Paper presentation]. Sixth ECINEQ Meeting, Université du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Europe.

Mercier, B., Wiwad, D., Piff, P. K., Aknin, L. B., Robinson, A. R., Shariff, A., & Vazire, S. (2020). Does belief in free will increase support for economic inequality? Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 25.

Meyvis, T., & Van Osselaer, S. M. (2018). Increasing the power of your study by increasing the effect size. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1157-1173.

Moreno-Bella, E., Willis, G. B., & Moya, M. (2019). Economic inequality and masculinity– femininity: The prevailing perceived traits in higher unequal contexts are masculine. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–9.

Pedersen, R. T., & Mutz, D. C. (2019). Attitudes toward economic inequality: The illusory agreement. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(4), 835-851.

Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2011). System justification beliefs, affirmative action, and resistance to equal opportunity organizations. Social Cognition, 29(3), 376-390.

Piff, P. K., Wiwad, D., Robinson, A. R., Aknin, L. B., Mercier, B., & Shariff, A. (2020). Shifting attributions for poverty motivates opposition to inequality and enhances egalitarianism. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 496-505.

Pratto, F., Liu, J., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H. & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369-409.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763.

Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Bratanova, B., Willis, G. B., Lopez-Rodriguez, L., Sturrock, A. y Loughnan, S. (2017). Social class and ideologies of inequality: How they uphold societies. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 99-116.

Roex, K. L., Huijts, T., & Sieben, I. (2019). Attitudes towards income inequality: ‘Winners’ versus ‘losers’ of the perceived meritocracy. Acta Sociologica, 62(1), 47-63.

Sainz, M., Martínez, R., Sutton, R. M., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., & Moya, M. (2020). Less human, more to blame: Animalizing poor people increases blame and decreases support for wealth redistribution. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(4), 546-559.

Silván-Ferrero, Mª. P., & Bustillos, A. (2007). Adaptation of The Social Dominance Orientation scale into Spanish: Validation of groupbased dominance and opposition to equality as underlying factors. International Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 3-15.

Sommet, N., Elliot, A. J., Jamieson, J. P., & Butera, F. (2019). Income inequality, perceived competitiveness, and approach‐avoidance motivation. Journal of Personality, 87(4), 767-784.

Tan, X., Liu, L., Huag, Z., Zheng, W., & Liang, Y. (2016). The effects of general system justification on corruption perception and intent. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–11.

Tanjitpiyanond, P., Jetten, J., & Peters, K. (2022). How economic inequality shapes social class stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 98, Article 104248.

Tassinari, M & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2020). Perceived procedural justice, group identification, and support for economic equality: A test of the Group Engagement Model. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 6(2/1), 56-75.

The Economist Intelligence Unit (2018). Democracy Index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy.

United Nations (2021). Reduce inequality within and among countries.

Vargas-Salfate, S., Paez, D., Liu, J. H., Pratto, F., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). A comparison of social dominance theory and system justification: The role of social status in 19 nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 1060-1076.

Wiwad, D., Mercier, B., Maraun, M. D., Robinson, A. R., Piff, P. K., Aknin, L. B., & Sharuff, A. F. (2019). The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication. PLoS ONE, 14(6), Article e0218685.

Willis, G. B., García-Sánchez, E., Sánchez-Rodríguez, Á., GarcíaCastro, J. D., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2022). The psychosocial effects of economic inequality depend on its perception. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 301-309.

World Values Survey (WVS, 2014). 2010-2014 World Values Survey Wave 6 [Questionnaire]. World Values Survey Association.