Resumen
Antecedentes: Donaldson & Donaldson (2021b) desarrollaron una escala para evaluar el Funcionamiento Positivo en el Trabajo añadiendo cuatro nuevos bloques para reforzar el marco PERMA en el ámbito laboral. El objetivo del presente estudio fue validar esta escala en muestra española. Método: Participaron 698 trabajadores españoles, el 59% eran mujeres y el 41% hombres, el 71,6% eran asalariados y el 71,2% eran trabajadores básicos. Resultados: Los análisis factoriales confirmatorios mostraron buen ajuste del modelo de nueve factores (χ2/df = 2.441; RMSEA = .056, 90% IC (.049, .063); SRMR =. 062; CFI = .926; TLI = .916), del modelo bifactorial (χ2/df = 1.703; RMSEA = .044, 90% CI
[.037, .050]; SRMR = .050; CFI = .959; TLI = .952) y del modelo ESEM (χ2/df = 1.736; RMSEA = .041, 90% CI [.033,
.049]; SRMR = .017; CFI = .976; TLI = .942). La escala también mostró una buena consistencia interna, con un α de Cronbach de .90. También mostró validez discriminante, de criterio, predictiva y de incremento con otras medidas de bienestar y rendimiento, también invarianza en el nivel educativo. Conclusiones: Esta escala es una herramienta de medición integral que puede ayudar a diseñar programas e intervenciones en el trabajo.
Citas
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
Azanza, G., Domínguez, A. J., Moriano, J. A., & Molero, F. J. (2014). Positive psychological capital. Validation of the Spanish version of the PCQ questionnaire. Annals of Psychology, 30(1), 294–301. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.1.153631
Bartholomaeus, J. D., Van Agteren, J. E. M., Iasiello, M. P., Jarden, A., & Kelly, D. (2019). Positive aging: The impact of a community wellbeing and resilience program. Clinical Gerontologist, 42(4), 377-386. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/07317115.2018.1561582
Belete, A. K. (2018). Turnover intention influencing factors of employees: An empirical work review. Journal of Entrepreneurial Organization Management, 7(3), 253-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2169- 026X.1000253
Brown, T. A. (2015). Methodology in the social sciences. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81- 105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5
Dávila, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. A. (2010). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior from the functional analysis and role identity perspectives: Further evidence in Spanish employees. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1138741600003851
DeSimone, J. A., Harms, P. D., & DeSimone, A. J. (2015). Best practice recommendations for data screening. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962
Donaldson, S. I., & Chen, C. (2021). Positive organizational psychology interventions: Design and evaluation. Wiley-Blackwell.
Donaldson, S. I., & Donaldson, S. I. (2021a). Examining perma+4 and work role performance beyond self-report bias: Insights from multitrait-multimethod analyses. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(6), 888–897. https://doi.or g/10.1080/17439760.2021.1975160
Donaldson, S.I., & Donaldson, S.I. (2021b). The positive functioning at work scale: Psychometric assessment, validation, and measurement invariance. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 4, 181–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s41543-020-00033-1
Donaldson, S. I., Heshmati, S., Lee, J. Y., & Donaldson, S. I (2020). Examining building blocks of well-being beyond PERMA and self-report bias. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(6), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 7439760.2020.1818813
Donaldson, S. I., Lee, J. Y., & Donaldson, S. I. (2019a). Evaluating positive psychology interventions at work: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 4, 113-134. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s41042-019-00021-8
Donaldson, S. I., Lee, J. Y., & Donaldson, S. I. (2019b). The effectiveness of positive psychology interventions in the workplace: A theory-driven evaluation approach. In V. Z. Llewellyn & S. Rothmann (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to multi-cultural positive psychology interventions (pp. 115– 159). Springer International.
Donaldson, S. I., van Zyl, L. E., & Donaldson, S. I. (2022). PERMA+4: A framework for work-related wellbeing, performance and positive organizational psychology 2.0. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 817244. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.817244
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
Ferrando, P. J., Lorenzo-Seva, U., Hernández-Dorado, A., & Muñiz, J. (2022). Decálogo para el análisis factorial de los ítems de un test [Decalogue for the factor analysis of test items]. Psicothema, 34(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.456
Gaite, L., Ramírez, N., Herrera, S. & Vázquez-Barquero, J.L. (1997). Traducción y adaptación transcultural de instrumentos de evaluación en psiquiatría: Aspectos metodológicos [Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Assessment Instruments in Psychiatry: Methodological Aspects]. Archivos de Neurobiología, 60(2), 91–111.
Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Kauffman, S. B. (2018). Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388434
Headrick, L., Newman, D. A., Park, Y. A., & Lian, Y. (2023). Recovery experiences for work and health outcomes: A meta-analysis and recovery- engagement-exhaustion model. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38, 821-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09821-3
Hernández, A., Hidalgo, M. D., Hambleton, R. K., & Gómez Benito, J. (2020). International test commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema, 32(3), 390-398. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306
Ho, H. C. Y., & Chan, Y. C. (2022). Flourishing in the workplace: A one-year prospective study on the effects of perceived organizational support and psychological capital. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), Article 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020922
Kline, R. B. (2016). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Lambert, E. G., Hogan, N. L., Camp, S. D., & Ventura, L. A. (2006). The impact of work–family conflict on correctional staff: A preliminary study. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6(4), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806068572
Lapalme, M . L., Rojas-Quiroga, F., Pertuzé, J. A., Espizona, P., Rojas-Córdova, C., & Ananlas, J. F. (2023). Emotion regulation can build resources: How amplifying positive emotions is beneficial for employees and organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38, 539-560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09875-x
LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52
Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3
Martín-del-Río, B., Neipp, M. C., García-Selva, A., Solanes-Puchol, A. (2021). Positive organizational psychology: A bibliometric review and science mapping analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, Article 5222. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105222
Patrick, D.L., Wild, D.J., Johnson, E.S., Wagner, T.H. & Martin, M.A. (1994). Cross-cultural validation of quality of life measures. In J. Orley & W. Kuyken (eds.), Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives (pp. 19–32). Springer Verlag.
Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
Rodríguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
Roodt, G., & Bothma, C. (2013). The validation of the turnover intention scale: Original research. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.507
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An r package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Savalei, V., Brace, J., & Fouladi, R. T. (2021, May 9). We need to change how we compute RMSEA for nested model comparisons in structural equation modeling. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wprg8
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourishing: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the job-related affective well-being scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.219
Vázquez, C., Duque, A., & Hervás, G. (2013). Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, Article E82. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.82