Palabras clave
Radicalism
Religion
Validation
Scale Extremismo
Radicalismo
Religión
Validación
Escala
Cómo citar
Resumen
Antecedentes: en consonancia con la creciente violencia religiosa, política y social en todo el mundo, este estudio evalúa las propiedades psicométricas de la escala para la detección del extremismo y el radicalismo religioso (SERR), una medida de autoinforme del extremismo y el radicalismo religioso. Método: los análisis factoriales y las evidencias de validez y fiabilidad se recopilaron utilizando una muestra de 1985 participantes de 58 ciudades distintas de España que se identificaron a sí mismos como practicantes activos de su religión. Resultados: los análisis estadísticos de las puntuaciones SERR arrojaron puntuaciones de consistencia interna aceptables (ω > .74) y confirmaron los factores clave asociados con el radicalismo y el extremismo. La estructura de la escala se confirmó como bidimensional (χ²(64) = 361.22, p < .001, CFI = 0.976, TLI = 0.970, RMSEA (90% CI) = 0.089 (0.080 - 0.098), SRMR = 0.064). Las puntuaciones de la dimensión de extremismo se correlacionaron significativa y positivamente con las puntuaciones del mismo factor en la Escala de Intención de Activismo y Radicalismo (r = 0,32, p < 0.001, n = 139). Conclusiones: los autores concluyen que el SERR muestra una fiabilidad y validez adecuadas para evaluar el grado de extremismo y radicalismo en creyentes cristianos/católicos y musulmanes.
Citas
Abad, F., Olea, J., Ponsoda, V., & García, C. (2011). Medición en ciencias sociales y de la salud [Measurement in social and health sciences]. Síntesis.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]. IBM SPSS.
Badii, A., Guillen, O. P., Lugo, S., & Garnica, J. A. (2014). Correlación no-paramétrica y su aplicación en las investigaciones científica [Non- parametric correlation and its application in scientific research]. International Journal of Good Conscience, 9(2), 31–40.
Bélanger, J. J., Caouette, J., Sharvit, K., & Dugas, M. (2014). The psychology of martyrdom: Making the ultimate sacrifice in the name of a cause. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 107(3), 494–515. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036855
Bélanger, J. J., Moyano, M., Muhammad, H., Richardson, L., Lafrenière, M. A. K., McCaffery, P., Framand, K., & Nociti, N. (2019). Radicalization leading to violence: A test
of the 3N model. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00042
Braddock, K. (2020). Experimentation & quasi-experimentation in countering violent extremism: Direction of future inquiry. United States Institute of Peace.
Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press.
Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basics, concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
Cárdenas Castro, J. M., & Arancibia Martini, H. (2014). Potencia estadística y cálculo del tamaño del efecto en G*Power: complementos a las pruebas de significación estadística y su aplicación en psicología [Statistical power and effect size calculating in G*Power: Complementary analysis of statistical significance testing and its application in psychology]. Salud & Sociedad, 5(2), 210-244. https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.2014.0002.00006
Catena, A., Ramos, M. M., & Trujillo, H. M. (2003). Análisis multivariado: Un manual para investigadores [Multivariate analysis: A handbook for researchers]. Biblioteca Nueva.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press.
Cohen, A. B., Mazza, G. L., Johnson, K. A., Enders, C. K., Warner, C. M., Pasek, M. H., & Cook, J. E. (2017). Theorizing and measuring religiosity across cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(12), 1724–1736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217727732
Corner, E., Taylor, H., van der Vegt, I., Salman, N., Rottweiler, B., Hetzel, F., Clemmow, C., Schulten, N., & Gill, P. (2021). Reviewing the links between violent extremism and personality, personality disorders, and psychopathy. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(3), 378–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2021.1884736
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO- PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358
Douglas, K. S., & Reeves, K. A. (2010). Historical-Clinical-Risk management-20 (HCR-20) violence risk assessment scheme: Rationale, application, and empirical overview. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 147–185). Routledge/ Taylor & Francis Group.
Fachamps, M., & Labonne, J. (2017). Using Split Samples to Improve Inference on Causal Effects. Political Analysis, 25(4), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.22
Ferrando, P. J., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología [Factor analysis as a research technique in psychology]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18–33.
Ferrando, P. J., & Chico, E. (2000). Adaptación y análisis psicométrico de la escala de deseabilidad social de Marlowe y Crowne [Adaptation and psychometric analysis of the Marlowe and Crowne social desirability scale]. Psicothema, 12(3), 383–389.
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: Algunas consideraciones adicionales [Exploratory item factor analysis: Some additional considerations]. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1170–1175. https://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199991
Gil-Escudero, G., & Martínez-Arias, M. R. (2001). Metodología de encuestas [Survey methodology]. In M. J. Navas (Ed.), Métodos, Diseños y Técnicas de Investigación Psicológica (pp. 379–436). Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jackson, R. (2012). The Study of Terrorism 10 Years After 9/11: Successes, issues, challenges. Uluslararası İlişkiler / International Relations, 8(32), 1–16.
Kline, R. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Lloyd, M. (2016). Structured guidelines for assessing risk in extremist offenders. Assessment and Development Matters, 8(2), 15–18.
Lloyd, M. (2019). Extremist risk assessment: A directory. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats (CREST). https://crestresearch.ac.uk/
resources/extremism-risk-assessment-directory/Lloyd, M., & Dean, C. (2015). The development of structured guidelines for assessing risk in
extremist offenders. The Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 2(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000035
Lord, F. M., & Novick, R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley.
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fi t the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 88-91.
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
Martínez-Arias, R. (1995). Psicometría: Teoría de los tests psicológicos y educativos. Síntesis.
Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550902765508
Moyano, M. (2011). Factores psicosociales contribuyentes a la radicalización islamista de jóvenes en España: Construcción de un instrumento de evaluación [Psychosocial factors contributing to the Islamist radicalization of young people in Spain: Construction of an evaluation instrument]. (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019). Diez pasos para la construcción de un test [Ten steps for test development]. Psicothema, 31(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.291
Murphy, K., Madon, N. S., & Cherney, A. (2020). Reporting threats of terrorism: Stigmatisation, procedural justice and policing Muslims in Australia. Policing and Society, 30(4), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1551393
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.J. (1995). Teoría psicométrica [Psychometric theory]. McGraw-Hill.Ozer, S., & Bertelsen, P. (2018). Capturing violent radicalization: Developing and validating scales measuring central aspects of radicalization. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 653–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12484
Phillips, B. J. (2021). How did 9/11 affect terrorism research? Examining articles and authors, 1970–2019. Terrorism and Political Violence. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2021.1935889
Pressman, E. D. (2009). Risk assessment decisions for violent political extremism. Canadian Centre for Security and Intelligence Studies, Carleton University.
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/2009-02-rdv/index-en. aspx
Pressman, E. D. (2014). Violent extremist risk assessment. Issues and applications of the VERA 2 in a high- security correctional setting. In
A. Silke (Ed.), Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism: Critical Issues in Management, Radicalisation and Reform (pp. 122–143). Routledge.
Pressman, D.E., & Flockton, J.S. (2012). Calibrating risk of violent political extremists and terrorists: The VERA-2 structured assessment. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 14(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636641211283057
Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566.
Roy, O. (2017). Jihad and death: The global appeal of Islamic State. Oxford University Press.
Ruiz, M. A., Pardo, A., & San Martín, R. (2010). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales [Structural equation models]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1),
–45.
Scarcella, A., Page, R., & Furtado, V. (2016). Terrorism, radicalisation, extremism, authoritarianism and fundamentalism: A systematic review of the quality and psychometric properties of assessments. PLoS ONE, 11(12), e0166947. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166947
Schultz, W. J., Bucerius, S. M., & Haggerty, K. D. (2021). The floating signifier of “radicalization”: Correctional officers’ perceptions of prison radicalization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 48(6), 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854820969749
Schuurman, B. (2019). Topics in terrorism research: Reviewing trends and gaps, 2007-2016. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(3), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2019.1579777
Schuurman, B. (2020). Research on terrorism, 2007–2016: A review of data, methods, and authorship. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1011– 1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1439023
Shaheed, A. (2021). Countering Islamophobia/anti-Muslim hatred to eliminate discrimination and intolerance based on religion or belief. Human Rights Council. Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/FreedomReligion/Pages/ HatredAndDiscrimination.aspx
Shi, D., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2020). The effect of estimation methods on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(3), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164419885164
Silke, A. (2004). Terrorism, 9/11 and psychology. The Psychologist, 17(9), 518–521.
Silke, A. (2014). Risk assessment of terrorist and extremist prisoners. In A. Silke (Ed.), Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism: Critical Issues in Management,
Radicalisation and Reform (pp. 108–121). Routledge.
Swann, W. B., Gómez, Á., Seyle, D. C., Morales, J. F., & Huici, C. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 995–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013668
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16, 209–220.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
Topolovec-Vranic, J., & Natarajan, K. (2016). The use of social media in recruitment for medical research studies: A scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(11), e286. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5698
Trujillo, H. M., Prados, M., & Moyano, M. (2016). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la escala de intención de activismo y radicalismo [Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the activism and radicalism intention scale]. Revista de Psicología Social, 31(1), 157–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2015.1101317
van der Heide, L., van der Zwan, M., & van Leyenhorst, M. (2019). The practitioner’s guide to the galaxy: A comparison of risk assessment tools for violent extremism. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT). https://icct.nl/app/uploads/2019/09/ThePractitionersGuidetothe Galaxy-1.pdf
Vigil-Colet, A., Morales, F., Camps, E., Tous, J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2013). Development and validation of the overall personality assessment scale (OPERAS). Psicothema, 25(1), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2011.411