Bullying Victimization Trajectories: Associations With Changes in Social Status Dimensions Within the Classroom Group
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Bullying
Social status dimensions
Latent class growth analysis
Multigroup analyses Bullying
Dimensiones de estatus social
Análisis de crecimiento de clase latente
Análisis de grupos múltiples

How to Cite

Bravo, A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Romera, E. M. (2024). Bullying Victimization Trajectories: Associations With Changes in Social Status Dimensions Within the Classroom Group. Psicothema, 36(3), 207–216. Retrieved from https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/21617

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have identified the association between classroom social status and bullying victimization, but it remains unclear how different victimization trajectories relate separately to social status dimensions: preference (acceptance and rejection) and popularity (popular and unpopular), and whether there are differences between victimization trajectory groups. This study assumed a longitudinal approach to explore these research questions. Method: A total of 3.182 (50% girls; M = 12.55 years at wave 1) students participated in the study. Results: Four bullying victimization trajectory groups were found: high, decreasing, increasing and low in victimization. Multigroup analyses showed that high in victimization group had the worst acceptance, rejection,     and unpopularity indexes. The decreasing victimization group  increased  in  acceptance  and  popularity,  whereas the increasing victimization group increased in rejection and popularity. Conclusions: These results underline the importance of considering the different dimensions of social status and their association with victimization trajectories when anti-bullying programs are proposed.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2014). Auxiliary variables in Mixture Modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181

Biggs, B. K., Vernberg, E., Little, T. D., Dill, E. J., Fonagy, P., & Twemlow, S. W. (2010). Peer victimization trajectories and their association with children’s affect in late elementary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409348560

Bravo, A., Ortega‐Ruiz, R., Veenstra, R., Engels, M. C., & Romera, E. M. (2022). Friendship selection and influence processes for popularity in early and mid-adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 94, 45–56. https://doi. org/10.1002/jad.12004

Casper, D. M., Card, N. A., & Barlow, C. (2020). Relational aggression and victimization during adolescence: A meta-analytic review of unique associations with popularity, peer acceptance, rejection, and friendship characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 80, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. adolescence.2019.12.012

Cillessen, A. H., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x.

Cillessen, A. H. N., Schwartz, D., & Mayeux, L. (2011). Popularity in the peer system. The Guilford Press.

Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082- 989X.6.4.330

Cook, C. R.,Williams, K. R.,Guerra, N. G., Kim, T. E., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65-83.

Dawes, M., & Malamut, S. (2020). No one is safe: Victimization experiences of high-status youth. Adolescent Research Review, 5(1), 27–47. https://doi. org/10.1007/s40894-018-0103-6

de Vries, E., Kaufman, T. M. L., Veenstra, R., Laninga-Wijnen, L., & Huitsing,

G. (2021). Bullying and victimization trajectories in the first years of secondary education: implications for status and affection. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(10), 1995–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020- 01385-w

Demol, K., Verschueren, K., ten Bokkel, I. M., van Gils, F. E., & Colpin, H. (2021). Trajectory classes of relational and physical bullying victimization: Links with peer and teacher-student relationships and social-emotional outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51, 1354–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-021-01544-7

Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58(3), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112416

Furlong, M. J., Sharkey, J. D., Felix, E. D., Tanigawa, D., & Green, J. G. (2010). Bullying assessment: A call for increased precision of self-reporting procedures. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 329–345). Taylor & Francis Group.

Gorman, A. H., Schwartz, D., Nakamoto, J., & Mayeux, L. (2011). Unpopularity and disliking among peers: Partially distinct dimensions of adolescents’ social experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(4), 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.05.001

Hymel, S., Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., & Renshaw, P. D. (2002). Peer acceptance and rejection in childhood. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (pp. 265–284). Blackwell Publishin.

Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x Laninga-Wijnen, L., Steglich, C., Harakeh, Z., Vollebergh, W., Veenstra, R., & Dijkstra, J. K.. (2020). The role of prosocial and aggressive popularity norm combinations in prosocial and aggressive friendship processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 49, 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01088-x

Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722

Maassen, G. H., van der Linden, J. L., Goossens, F. A., & Bokhorst, J. (2000). A ratings-based approach to two-dimensional sociometric status determination. In A. H. N. Cillessen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 55–73). Jossey-Bass.

Marks, P. E. L., Babcock, B., van den Berg, Y. H. M., Gommans, R., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2021). Adolescent popularity as a nonlinear, two-dimensional construct: Convergent results from three large samples. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316211016066 Marks, P. E. L., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Crick, N. R. (2012). Popularity contagion among adolescents. Social Development, 21(3), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00647.x

Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (pp. 551–611). Oxford University Press.

McDonald, K. L., & Asher, S. R. (2018). Peer acceptance, peer rejection, and popularity: Social-cognitive and behavioral perspectives. In W.

M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 429–446). The Guilford Press.

Mora-Merchán, J., Espino, E., & Del Rey, R. (2021). Development of effective coping strategies to reduce school bullying and their impact on stable victims. Psychology, Society & Education, 13(3), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v13i3.5586

Morin, A. J. S., McLarnon, M. J. W., & Litalien, D. (2020). Mixture modeling for organizational behavior research. In Handbook on the Temporal Dynamics of Organizational Behavior (pp. 351–379). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974387.00031

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th edition). Muthén & Muthén.

Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. (2005). Developmental trajectory groups: Fact or a useful statistical fiction? Criminology, 43(4), 873–903.

Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396

Ortega-Ruiz, R., Del Rey, R., & Casas, J. A. (2016). Assessing bullying and cyberbullying: Spanish validation of EBIPQ and ECIPQ. Psicología Educativa, 22(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.004

Ortega-Ruiz, R., Elipe, P., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Genta, M. L., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Smith, P. K., Thompson, F., & Tippett, N. (2012). The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: A European cross-national study. Aggressive Behavior, 38(5), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21440

Romera, E. M., Bravo, A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Veenstra, R. (2019). Differences in perceived popularity and social preference between bullying roles and class norms. PLoS ONE, 14(10), Article e0223499. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0223499

Romera, E. M., Jiménez, C., Bravo, A., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2021). Social status and friendship in peer victimization trajectories. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 21(1), Article 100191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.07.003

Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007

Sentse, M., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status: Age-related and gender differences. Social Development, 24(3), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/ sode.12115

Sheppard, C. S., Giletta, M., & Prinstein, M. J. (2019). Peer victimization trajectories at the adolescent transition: associations among chronic victimization, peer-reported status, and adjustment. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 48(2), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 5374416.2016.1261713

Smith, P. K. (2016). Bullying: Definition, types, causes, consequences and intervention. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12266

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations General Assembly. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ares70d1_en.pdf

van den Berg, Y. H. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2013). Computerized sociometric and peer assessment: An empirical and practical evaluation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 68-76.

van den Berg, Y. H. M., Lansu, T.A. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2020). Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status: A meta-analytic review of 20 years of research. Journal of Adolescence, 84, 78-95.

Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81(2), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01411.x

World Health Organization. (2014). Health for the world’s adolescents. A second chance in the second decade: summary (WHO/FWC/ MCA/14.05). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/ handle/10665/112750