Multilateral trade liberalization and public goods provision in a North-South trade model with nonhomothetic preferences

Authors

  • Joachim Stibora Kingston University
  • Albert de Vaal Radboud University Nijmegen, Institute for Management Research

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.1.2.2012.27-36

Abstract

Nonhomothetic preferences imply that developing countries are less likely to gain from multilateral trade liberalization than developed countries. This paper shows that this relative disadvantage for developing countries changes when effects on public good provision are taken into account. The direction of the change depends on the strength of their comparative advantage in export markets. We show that a strong (weak) comparative advantage in export markets mitigates (reinforces) the relative disadvantage of multilateral trade liberalization for developing countries. Moreover, in the presence of public goods provision, the relative disadvantage for developing countries with a strong comparative advantage is further mitigated when income differences within countries are also taken into account.

References

Anderson, J.E. and Neary, J. P. (2007) Welfare versus market access: the implications of tariff structure for tariff reform, Journal of International Economics, 71, 187-205.

Costinot, A. (2009) An elementary theory of comparative advantage, Econometrica, 77, 1165-1192.

Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1983) Economics and consumer behaviour, Cambridge University Press: New York.

Ebrill, L, Stotsky, J. and Gropp, R. (1999) Revenue implications of trade liberalization, IMF Occasional Paper No 180, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.

Fajgelbaum , P.D., G.M. Grossman and E. Helpman (2011) Income distribution, product quality, and international trade, Journal of Political Economy, 119, 721-765.

Hunter, L.C. (1991) The contribution of nonhomothetic preferences to trade, Journal of International Economics, 30, 345-358.

Hunter, L.C. and Markusen, J.R. (1988) Per-capita income as a determinant of trade, in: R. Feenstra (ed.): Empirical methods for international trade, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 89-109.

Khattry, B. and Rao, J.M. (2002) Fiscal faux pas?: an analysis of the revenue implications of trade liberalization, World Development, 30, 1431-1444.

Matsuyama, K. (2000) A Ricardian model with a continuum of goods under nonhomothetic preferences: demand complementarities, income distribution and North-South trade, Journal of Political Economy, 108, 1093-1120.

Stibora, J. and de Vaal, A. (2007) Trade policy in a Ricardian model with a continuum of goods under nonhomothetic preferences, Journal of Development Economics, 84, 350-377.

Stibora, J. and de Vaal, A. (2007a) Trade liberalization and its fiscal implications in a North-South trade model, Economics discussion paper 2007/01, Kingston University, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, School of Economics, February 2007: http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/1380/

UN Economic and Social Council (2004) Basic data on government expenditure and taxation, Report of the secretariat for the Committee of Experts on Public Administration, E/C.16/2004/7, United Nations, New York.

World Bank (2011) World Development Indicators, http://data.worldbank.org/indicator: Taxes on international trade (% of revenue).

Downloads

Published

2012-09-06

How to Cite

Stibora, J., & de Vaal, A. (2012). Multilateral trade liberalization and public goods provision in a North-South trade model with nonhomothetic preferences. Economics and Business Letters, 1(2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.1.2.2012.27-36

Issue

Section

Articles