Abstract
Modernity is a historical period marked by the economic, political and cultural hegemony of western civilization. In this context, the confrontation with the otherness and valuation of one's own andother people's material culture has been affected by the establishment of asymmetric relationships. We question in this article the purist dogmatism that promotes denigration of the ornament after the proclamation of its uselessness. The decorative patterns that extend through the wall hangings, furniture, books or fabrics, have been linked, over time and in different geographical areas, with apotropaic effects. Despite the protection, warning, deterrence or fascination functions that these devices seem tohave performed, their use has just become a sign of cultural inferiority.
References
BATAILLE, Georges. La parte maldita. Precedida de La noción de gasto, Icaria, Barcelona, 1987.
BUCI-GLUCKSMANN, Christine. Philosophie de l´ornement. D´Orient en Occident, Editions Galilée, Paris, 2008.
CAILLOIS, Roger. “Mimétisme et psychasténie légendarie” en Minotaure, n° 7, París, Junio de 1935.
CRARY, Jonathan. “Sobre los finales del sueño: sombras en el resplandor de un mundo 24/7”, en Noimagen, Centro de estudios visuales. Nº 1, 2016.
FREEDBERG, David. El poder de las imágenes. Madrid. Cátedra, 1992.
GELL, Alfred. Arte y agencia. Una teoría antropológica, Buenos Aires, Editorial sb, 2016
LATOUR, Bruno. Nunca hemos sido modernos. Ensayo de antropología simétrica. Debate. Madrid
LÉVINAS, Emmanuel. La huella del otro, Mexico Taurus, 2000
LEVI-STRAUSS, Claude. Structural anthropology. Translated by Claire Jacob- son and Brooke Grundfesr Schoef. Basic Books. New York. 1963.
MÉNDEZ BAIGES, Maite. “Eco-estética del camuflaje.”,Camuflajes [cat.exp] Madrid: La Casa Encendida, 2009