Resumo
This article presents a quantitative analysis of Europeana metadata for the regions of Asturias (Spain), Lõuna-Eesti (Estonia) and Värmland (Sweden), measuring the representation of craft heritage—in both its tangible and intangible dimensions—as conditioned by the predominant digitisation philosophy of each corpus. The three regions represent three contrasting models: text-dominant (Asturias), image-dominant (Lõuna-Eesti), and balanced (Värmland). Through multilingual dictionary-based text mining applied to more than 326,000 records across twelve lexical categories, results demonstrate that digitisation philosophy shapes both the prevalence and co-occurrence structure of craft vocabulary. Cramér's V values ranging from 0.098 (Asturias) to 0.999 (Lõuna-Eesti) reveal structurally distinct patterns of tangible–intangible co-presence, with direct implications for data accessibility in rural cultural tourism contexts.
Referências
Baca, Murtha, ed. Introduction to Metadata. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Getty Publications, 2016.
Capurro, Carlotta. “Digitality as a Cultural Policy Instrument: Europeana and the Europeanisation of Digital Heritage.” In Critical Heritage Studies and the Futures of Europe, 223–42. 2023. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.3385987.23.
Capurro, Carlotta, and Marta Severo. “Mapping European Digital Heritage Politics: An Empirical Study of Europeana as a Web-Based Network.” Heritage & Society 19, no. 1 (2026): 136–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2023.2266801.
Cramér, Harald. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1946.
Europeana Foundation. “Europeana Data Model Documentation (v5.2.8).” 2023. https://pro.europeana.eu/page/edm-documentation.
Gazzola, Silvia, and Melanie Smith. “Cultural Tourism and Digital Heritage Platforms: Opportunities and Challenges for Rural Regions.” Tourism Management Perspectives 44 (2022): 101–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2022.100988.
Grimmer, Justin, and Brandon M. Stewart. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21, no. 3 (2013): 267–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028.
Haslhofer, Bernhard, and Antoine Isaac. “data.europeana.eu: The Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 94–104. The Hague: Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 2011.
Jelić, Andrea, Gregory Marinic, and Claire Colomb. “Rural Tourism and Intangible Cultural Heritage: Bridging the Gap Between Policy and Practice.” Journal of Rural Studies 97 (2023): 112–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.008.
Leifsdóttir, Amalia, and Gunnar Thór Jóhannesson. “Craft, Place and Tourism: The Materiality of Artisanal Heritage in Rural Development.” Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 22, no. 2 (2022): 143–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2022.2041875.
Pearson, Karl. “On the Criterion that a Given System of Deviations from the Probable in the Case of a Correlated System of Variables Is Such That It Can Be Reasonably Supposed to Have Arisen from Random Sampling.” Philosophical Magazine 50, no. 302 (1900): 157–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440009463897.
Shannon, Claude E. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal 27, no. 3 (1948): 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.
UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO, 2003. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention.
