Development of reflective thinking through the application of transcendental projects.
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

paradigma
método
transdisciplinaria
investigación y reflexión paradigma
método
transdisciplinaridade
pesquisa
reflexão paradigm
method
transdisciplinary
research and reflection

How to Cite

Contreras Cabrera, M. A. (2022). Development of reflective thinking through the application of transcendental projects. Riaices, 4(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.17811/ria.4.1.2022.23-28

Abstract

The present research is based on a research context that recognizes the need to cognitively develop reflective capacities of the subjects through transdisciplinary dialectical research, highlighting that between the foundational reasoning and epistemology, the relationship that exists with the positivist and positive paradigms is described. interpretative, conceiving complex thought from a paradigmatic vision that predominates in the developed process. In relation to the research problem requested, an inquiry is integrated into multiple categories and criteria that demonstrate the relevance of being addressed, because the subjects need to develop reflective thinking, being evident in the conditions of our country, since the theoretical framework they contemplate those theories that consolidate the structure and use of transdisciplinary research, exemplified in the prospective method used at the moment of reading reality. In the following spaces, a description of the consistency, relationship and operation of the different moments that make up the methodological process of transdisciplinary dialectical research is added, associated with the development and discussion in which progress of the information that has been consulted and analyzed about different countries is shown. that have favorable conditions that are subsequently unraveled in the results and conclusions.

https://doi.org/10.17811/ria.4.1.2022.23-28
PDF (Español (España))

References

Baena, G. (2015). Planeación prospectiva estratégica teorías, metodologías y buenas prácticas en américa latina. Metadata.

Díaz, L. y Rosales R. (2003). Metaevaluación: Evaluación de la evaluación de políticas, programas y proyectos sociales. EUNED.

Domínguez, V. y López, M. (2017). Teoría General de Sistemas, un enfoque práctico. Tecnociencia Chihuahua. Vol. X, Núm. 3. 125-132.

Gómez, B. (2011). Un modelo de evaluación (Autorregulación) para centros docentes. Visión Libros.

González, H. (2005). La memoria en el atril: entre los mitos de archivo y el pasado de las experiencias. Ediciones Colihue SRL.

Hernández, C. (2008). Incertidumbre y complejidad: reflexiones acerca de los retos y dilemas de la pedagogía contemporánea. Revista Electrónica "Actualidades Investigativas en Educación" vol. 8, núm. 1, 1-13. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/447/447 80102.pdf.

Miklos, T. y Tello, M. (2007). Planeación prospectiva: una estrategia para el diseño del futuro. Limusa.

Saavedra, M. (2014). Formación docente eficaz: estrategia de investigación dialéctica transdisciplinaria. Pax.

Usher, R. e Ian, B. (1997). La educación de adultos como teoría, práctica e investigación: el triángulo cautivo. Morata.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Riaices

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.