Keywords
best practices
good practices
circuits of knowledge
stakeholder collaboration ciudades compactas
mejores prácticas
buenas prácticas
circuitos de conocimiento
gobernanza participativa villes compactes
meilleures pratiques
bonnes pratiques
circuits de la connaissance
gouvernance participative
How to Cite
Abstract
The compact city is an ideal model for sustainability, transferred between cities as ‘best practices’. This article investigates how context-adaptive transfer of compact city ideals can take place, using Barcelona, Rotterdam and Gothenburg as examples. The objectives are to 1) summarize urban qualities discussed by stakeholders in the three cities; 2) uncover dominant urban challenges and strategies among Barcelona, Rotterdam and Gothenburg stakeholders; and 3) present how Barcelona/Rotterdam ‘best practices’ are translated and transformed by Gothenburg stakeholders into situated ‘good practices’. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 82 stakeholders in Barcelona and Rotterdam and a workshop with 17 stakeholders in Gothenburg. The article shows that any meaningful and consequential mobility of knowledge through best practices requires stakeholder-enabled translation involving social learning and co-production of locally relevant knowledge. This means that a wide range of stakeholders needs to be engaged, including affected citizens, to secure representation and transparency. To succeed, best practices need embellishment with sufficient contextual information in formats possible to understand and process by these stakeholders. Strengthened involvement of stakeholders in transfer, translation and transformation of ‘best practices’ into ‘good practices’ requires improved models for stakeholder engagement, moving away from prevalent top-down attitudes of many city governments.
References
Adelfio, M., Hamiduddin, I., & Miedema, E. (2020). London’s King’s Cross redevelopment: A compact, resource efficient and ‘liveable’ global city model for an era of climate emergency? Urban Research & Practice, 14(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1710860
Adelfio, M., Kain, J., Stenberg, J., & Thuvander, L. (2019). GISualization: Visualized integration of multiple types of data for knowledge co-production. Geografisk Tidsskrift, 119(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2019.1605301
Adelfio, M., Kain, J., Thuvander, L., & Stenberg, J. (2018). Disentangling the compact city drivers and pressures: Barcelona as a case study. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 72(5), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2018.1547788
Adelfio, M., Aguiar, U. N., Fertner, C., & Da Cruz Brandão, E. (2022). Translating ‘New Compactism’, circulation of knowledge and local mutations: Copenhagen’s Sydhavn as a case study. International Planning Studies, 27(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1979943
Ahfeldt, G. M., & Pietrostefani, E. (2017). The compact city in empirical research: A quantitative literature review. LSE Research Online Documents on Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/83638.html
Ajuntament de Barcelona (2012). Marc Estratègic de l'Ajuntament de Barcelona: Programa d’Actuació Municipal 2012-2015.
Ajuntament de Barcelona https://www.barcelona.cat/barcelonainclusiva/ca/2012/10/pam.pdf
Albrecht, M., Kortelainen, J., Sawatzky, M., Lukkarinen, J., & Rytteri, T. (2017). Translating bioenergy policy in Europe: Mutation, aims and boosterism in EU energy governance. Geoforum, 87, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.003
Albrecht, M., & Rytteri, T. (2017). Policy failures in mobile and complex contexts: Translating EU energy policy in Finland. Alue Ja Ympäristö, 46(2), 18–31. https://aluejaymparisto.journal.fi/article/download/68853/30520
Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2010). Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antipode, 42(5), 1071–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x
Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.003
Arbaci, S., & Rae, I. (2012). Mixed‐tenure neighbourhoods in London: Policy myth or effective device to alleviate deprivation? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01145.x
Barcelona City Council (2021). Demographic indicators. Population density (inhabitants / ha) of the city of Barcelona. Barcelona City Council. https://opendata-ajuntament.barcelona.cat/data/dataset/est-densitat
Bibby, P., Henneberry, J., & Halleux, J. (2020). Incremental residential densification and urban spatial justice: The case of England between 2001 and 2011. Urban Studies, 58(10), 2117–2138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020936967
Boyko, C. T., & Cooper, R. (2011). Clarifying and re-conceptualising density. Progress in Planning, 76(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2011.07.001
Breheny, M. (1996). Centrists, decentrists and compromisers: Views on the future of urban form. In M. Jenks, E. Burton, & K. Williams (Eds.), The compact city: A sustainable urban form? (pp. 13-35). London: E & FN Spon.
Burkhard, R. A. (2005). Knowledge visualization - The use of complementary visual representations for the transfer of knowledge. A model, a framework, and four new approaches. [Doctoral Thesis, ETH Zurich]. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-005004486
Burton, E. (2000). The compact city: Just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Studies, 37(11), 1969–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980050162184
Busquets, J. (2005). Barcelona: The urban evolution of a compact city. Cambridge, MA: Nicolodi and Harvard University Graduate School of Design.
Campbell, S. D. (2016). The planner’s triangle revisited: Sustainability and the evolution of a planning ideal that can’t stand still. Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(4), 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080
Cavicchia, R. (2021). Are green, dense cities more inclusive? Densification and housing accessibility in Oslo. Local Environment, 26(10), 1250–1266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1973394
Cheshire, P. C. (2006). Resurgent cities, urban myths and policy hubris: What we need to know. Urban Studies, 43(8), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600775600
Churchman, A. (1999). Disentangling the concept of density. Journal of Planning Literature, 13(4), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854129922092478
City of Gothenburg (2012). Rivercity Gothenburg: Vision. Gothenburg City Council.
City of Gothenburg (2014a). Development Strategy Gothenburg 2035. Gothenburg: The Planning and Building Authority.
City of Gothenburg (2014b). Gothenburg 2035: Transport Strategy for a Close-Knit City. Gothenburg: The Urban Transport Administration.
City of Gothenburg (2014c). Göteborg: Grönstrategi för en tät och grön stad (Gothenburg: Green Strategy for a Dense and Green City). Gothenburg: The Parks and Nature Administration.
City of Gothenburg (2022). Så ser Göteborg ut om 20 år (This is the way Gothenburg will look in 20 years). City of Gothenburg. https://stadsutveckling.goteborg.se/sa-planeras-staden/arkitektur/nyheter/sa-ser-goteborg-ut-om-20-ar/
Cresswell, T., & Merriman, P. (2011). Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects. Routledge.
Curtis, C. (2012). Delivering the 'D' in transit oriented development: Examining the town planning challenge. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(3), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v5i3.292
Dantzig, G. B., & Saaty, T. L. (1973). Compact city: Plan for a liveable urban. W. H. Freeman.
Demographia (2023). Demographia world urban areas (Built Up Urban Areas or World Agglomerations) 19th Annual edition. https://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf
Dieleman, F., & Wegener, M. (2004). Compact city and urban sprawl. Built Environment, 30(4), 308-323.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
Elwood, S. (2006). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x
EU Ministers (2007). Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities. In European Commission (2011). Cities of tomorrow – Challenges, visions, ways forward. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy.
Faludi, A. (1973). Planning theory. Pergamon Press.
Faulconbridge, J. R. (2010). Global architects: Learning and innovation through communities and constellations of practice. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(12), 2842-2858. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4311
Filipe, A., Renedo, A., & Marston, C. (2017). The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLOS Biology, 15, e2001403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403
Frantzeskaki, N., & Kabisch, N. (2016). Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance—Lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. Environmental Science & Policy, 62, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
Frey, H. (1999). Compact, decentralised or what? The sustainable city debate. In H. Frey (Ed.), Designing the city: Towards a more sustainable urban form (pp. 23–35). London: E & FN Spoon.
Gemeente Rotterdam (2007). Stadsvisie Rotterdam: Ruimtelijke Ontwikkelingsstrategie 2030 (Rotterdam urban vision: Spatial development strategy 2030). City of Rotterdam.
Górgolas, P. (2018). El reto de compactar la periferia residencial contemporánea: Densificación eficaz, centralidades selectivas y diversidad funcional. ACE: Architecture, City and Environment = Arquitectura, Ciudad y Entorno, 13(38), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.13.38.5211
Grodach, C., & Limb, M. (2020). Compact City Reset: Towards Alternatives to Market-driven Density. Urban Policy and Research, 38(4), 287–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2020.1827543
Hamedinger, A. (2014). The mobility and/or fixity of urban and planning policies – The role of divergent urban planning cultures. European Spatial Research and Policy, 21(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.2478/esrp-2014-0003
Herburger, J. (2023). It's not about compact cities. Dialogues in Human Geography, 13(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206221144822
Harris, A., & Moore, S. (2013). Planning histories and practices of circulating urban knowledge. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1499-1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12043
Healey, P. (2013). Circuits of knowledge and techniques: The transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1510-1526. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12044
Hofstad, H. (2012). Compact city development: High ideals and emerging practices. European Journal of Spatial Development, 10(5).
Holman, N., Mace, A., Paccoud, A., & Sundaresan, J. (2015). Coordinating density; working through conviction, suspicion and pragmatism. Progress in Planning, 101, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2014.05.001
Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J. M., Olfert, A., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., Walther, J., & Schiller, G. (2023). Creating actionable knowledge one step at a time: An analytical framework for tracing systems and agency in niche innovation pathways. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 46, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.11.007
Huning, S., & Schuster, N. (2015). ‘Social mixing' or ‘gentrification'? Contradictory perspectives on urban change in the Berlin district of Neukölln. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 738-755. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12280
Jenks, M., Burton, E., & Williams, K. (1996). The compact city: A sustainable urban form? E & FN Spon.
Jessop, B., Moulaert, F., Hulgård, L., & Hamdouch, A. (2014). Social innovation research: A new stage in innovation analysis? In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 110-130). Edward Elgar.
Jöns, H., Meusburger, P., & Heffernan, M. (2017). Mobilities of knowledge. Springer.
Kain, J-H., Adelfio, M., Stenberg, J., & Thuvander, L. (2021). Towards a systemic understanding of compact city qualities. Journal of Urban Design, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2021.1941825
Kain, J-H., Stenberg, J., Adelfio, M., Oloko, M., Thuvander, L., Zapata, P., & Zapata Campos, M. J. (2020). What makes a compact city? Differences between urban research in the global north and the global south. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 24(4), 25-49.
Kelly, L. M., & Cordeiro, M. (2020). Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes. Methodological Innovations, 13(2), 2059799120937242. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799120937242
Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2007). Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 14(1), 78-91.
Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Transitioning policy: Co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage.
Laugen, B. T., & Boer, H. (2007). The implementation of best practices: Process and performance effects. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00453.x
Lim, H. K., & Kain, J-H. (2016). Compact cities are complex, intense and diverse but: Can we design such emergent urban properties? Urban Planning, 1(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i1.535
London, M., Polzer, J. T., & Omoregie, H. (2005). Interpersonal congruence, transactive memory, and feedback processes: An integrative model of group learning. Human Resource Development Review, 4(2), 114-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305275767
Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2-3), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177
McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107-130.
McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x
McFarlane, C. (2009). Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Geoforum, 40(4), 561-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.05.003
Moity-Maïzi, P. (2011). Questioning the localization and circulation of knowledge in Africa. Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.014.0474
Moore, S. (2013). What’s wrong with best practice? Questioning the typification of new urbanism. Urban Studies, 50(11), 2371-2387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013478231
Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-minute city”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart Cities, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010006
Mukhtarov, F. (2014). Rethinking the travel of ideas: Policy translation in the water sector. Policy & Politics, 42(1), 71-88.
Muñoz, F. M. (2010). Urbanalisation: Common landscapes, global places. The Open Urban Studies Journal, 3(1), 78-88. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874942901003010078
Musterd, S., Marcińczak, S., van Ham, M., & Tammaru, T. (2017). Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities: Increasing separation between poor and rich. Urban Geography, 38(7), 1062-1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1228371
Neuman, M. (2005). The compact city fallacy. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466
OECD (2012). Compact city policies: A comparative assessment. OECD Green Growth Studies.
Olshammar, G. (2019). Maintaining urban complexities: Seeking revitalization without gentrification of an industrial riverfront in Gothenburg, Sweden. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.201911153
Östling, J., Larsson Heidenblad, D., Sandmo, E., Nilsson Hammar, A., & Nordberg, K. H. (2018). The history of knowledge and the circulation of knowledge: An introduction. In J. Östling, E. Sandmo, D. Larsson Heidenblad, A. Nilsson Hammar, & K. H. Nordberg (Eds.), Circulation of knowledge: Explorations in the history of knowledge (pp. 9-33). Nordic Academic Press.
Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773-797.
Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2013). Neoliberal urbanism redux? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1091-1099. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12066
Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2017). Implementing public policy. In F. Fischer & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 89-108). Routledge.
Rao, V. (2007). Proximate distances: The phenomenology of density in Mumbai. Built Environment, 33(2), 227-248. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.33.2.227
Rosol, M., Béal, V., & Mössner, S. (2017). Greenest cities? The (post-)politics of new urban environmental regimes. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(8), 1710-1718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17714843
Rueda, S. (2007). Barcelona, ciudad mediterránea, compacta y compleja: Una visión de futuro más sostenible. Ayuntamiento de Barcelona y la Agencia de Ecología Urbana de Barcelona.
Rydin, Y. (2012). Using actor–network theory to understand planning practice: Exploring relationships between actants in regulating low-carbon commercial development. Planning Theory, 12(1), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212455494
SCB (2024). Statistikdatabasen. SCB Statistikmyndigheten. Retrieved 14-01-2025 from https://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101C/
Secord, J. A. (2004). Knowledge in transit. Isis, 95(4), 654 672. https://doi.org/10.1086/430657
Soneryd, L., & Lindh, E. (2019). Citizen dialogue for whom? Competing rationalities in urban planning, the case of Gothenburg, Sweden. Urban Research & Practice, 12(3), 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1436721
Tait, M., & Jensen, O. B. (2007). Travelling ideas, power and place: The cases of urban villages and business improvement districts. International Planning Studies, 12(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470701453778
Theodore, N. (2019). Policy mobilities. In B. Warf (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in geography. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199874002-0205
Tillie, N., Aarts, M., Marijnissen, M., Stenhuijs, L., Borsboom, J., Rietveld, E., Doepel, D., Visschers, J., & Lap, S. (2012). Rotterdam - People make the inner city: Densification + Greenification = Sustainable city. Rotterdam.
UN Climate Change (2021). Cities and regions: The 15-minute city. UNFCCC secretariat.
UN-Habitat (2012). Urban planning for city leaders. UN HABITAT.
Verhagen, F. C. (2014). Sustainable communities: A lens for envisioning and achieving a community-based culture of social and ecological peace. Journal of Peace Education, 11(3), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400201.2014.954361
von Schönfeld, K. C., Tan, W., Wiekens, C., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2020). Unpacking social learning in planning: Who learns what from whom? Urban Research & Practice, 13(4), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1576216
Watson, V. (2014). Co-production and collaboration in planning – The difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), 62-76.
Wikipedia (2018). Carnisserbuurt. Wikipedia. Retrieved 14-01-2025 from https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnisserbuurt
Wikipedia (2024a). Oude Westen. Wikipedia. Retrieved 14-01-2025 from https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oude_Westen
Wikipedia (2024b). Rotterdam. Wikipedia. Retrieved 14-01-2025 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotterdam