Consequences of teaching styles in Physical Education: Differences between Bilingual and non-Bilingual Programs
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Teaching behaviours
bilingual
outcomes
motivational strategies
students Conductas de enseñanza
bilingüe
consecuencias
estrategias motivacionales
alumnado

How to Cite

García Cazorla, J., Fernández-Miguel, G., Villafaña-Samper, Z., Mayo-Rota, C., Diloy-Peña, S., & Abós, Ángel. (2025). Consequences of teaching styles in Physical Education: Differences between Bilingual and non-Bilingual Programs. Magister. Journal of Teacher Training and Educational Innovation, 37, 1–8. Retrieved from https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/MSG/article/view/21395

Abstract

Objective: The present study had two objectives. The first was to examine the relationship between students’ perceptions of the different (de)motivating teaching styles used by their Physical Education (PE) teachers and experiences in PE, perceived learning and intention to be
active. Second, to examine possible differences between the study variables, depending on the educational programme to which the students belong (i.e., bilingual or non-bilingual).
Method: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study involving 95 secondary school students from third and fourth grades (43 belong to the bilingual program).
Results: The findings revealed a positive relationship between autonomy-supportive and structuring styles with positive experiences and learning in PE, while the chaotic style was negatively associated with positive experiences. Students in the bilingual program perceived that their teachers used greater autonomy support and less control, as well as that they had better experiences compared to those in the non-bilingual program.
Conclusions: It appears necessary to create training programs for PE teachers that teach motivational strategies to promote motivating styles (i.e., autonomy support and structure) that enhance learning, experiences, and the intention to be active among students, especially in
non-bilingual groups

PDF (Español (España))

References

Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Reeve, J. (2019). Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293

Biddle, S. J. H., Ciaccioni, S., Thomas, G., & Vergeer, I. (2019). Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: An updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 42, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.08.011

Burgueño, R., Abós, Á., Sevil-Serrano, J., Haerens, L., De Cocker, K., & García-González, L. (2024). A circumplex approach to (de)motivating styles in physical education: Situations- In-School–Physical Education questionnaire in Spanish students, pre-service, and in-service teachers. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2023.2248098

Diloy-Peña, S., Abós, Á., Sevil-Serrano, J., García-Cazorla, J., & García-González, L. (2024). Students’ perceptions of physical education teachers’ (de)motivating styles via the circumplex approach: Differences by gender, grade level, experiences, intention to be active, and learning. European Physical Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X241229353

Diloy-Peña, S., García-González, L., Burgueño, R., Tilga, H., Koka, A., & Abós, Á. (2024). A cross-cultural examination of the role of (de-)motivating teaching styles in predicting students’ basic psychological needs in physical education: a circumplex approach. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2023-0036

Diloy-Peña, S., García-González, L., Sevil-Serrano, J., Sanz-Remacha, M., & Abós, Á. (2021). Motivational teaching style in physical education: How does it affect students’ experiences? Apunts. Educacion Fisica y Deportes, 144, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.5672/APUNTS.2014-0983.ES.(2021/2).144.06

Escriva-Boulley, G., Guillet-Descas, E., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Doren, N., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., & Haerens, L. (2021). Adopting the situation in school questionnaire to examine Physical Education teachers’ motivating and demotivating styles using a circumplex approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147342

Fuentealba-Urra, S., Rubio, A., Flores-Rivera, C., González-Carrasco, M., Oyanedel, J. C., Castillo-Quezada, H., Céspedes-Carreño, C., & Pacheco-Carrillo, J. (2022). Physical activity

habits and their relationship with sociodemographic factors in Chilean adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 915314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915314

García-Vélez, A. J., y Carrasco-Martínez, A. J. (2023). Análisis de la motivación hacia la práctica de actividad física orientada a la salud de los escolares del programa bilingüe en un centro de educación secundaria de la Región de Murcia. Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria De Didáctica De Las Lenguas Ext ranjeras, (VII), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.viVII.29159

Granero-Gallegos, A., Ruiz-Montero, P. J., Baena-Extremera, A., & Martínez-Molina, M. (2019). Effects of motivation, basic psychological needs, and teaching competence on

disruptive behaviours in secondary school physical education students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4828. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234828

Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., y Bull, F. C. (2020). Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys

with 1·6 million participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2

Jang, H., Kim, E. J., y Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002

Jang, H., Reeve, J., y Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682

Kalajas-Tilga, H., Koka, A., Hein, V., Tilga, H., & Raudsepp, L. (2020). Motivational processes in physical education and objectively measured physical activity among adolescents.

Journal of Sport and Health Science, 9(5), 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2019.06.001

Lasagabaster, D., y Doiz, A. (2015). A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of CLIL on Affective Factors. Applied Linguistics, amv059. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv059

Mayo-Rota, C., Diloy-Peña, S., García-Cazorla, J., Abós, Á., y García-González, L. (2022). Las conductas motivacionales docentes en Educación Física desde la óptica del modelo circular: Efectos sobre el lado oscuro de la motivación del alumnado. Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes, 463(3). https://doi.org/10.55166/reefd.vi463(3).1078

Patall, E. A., Yates, N., Lee, J., Chen, M., Bhat, B. H., Lee, K., Beretvas, S. N., Lin, S., Man Yang, S., Jacobson, N. G., Harris, E., y Hanson, D. J. (2023). A meta-analysis of teachers’ provision of structure in the classroom and students’ academic competence beliefs, engagement, and achievement. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.20

2274104

Pelletier, L. G., y Rocchi, M. (2016). Teachers’ Motivation in the Classroom. En W. Liu, J. Wang, R. Ryan (eds) Building Autonomous Learners (pp. 107–127). Springer. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-981-287-630-06

Ryan, R. M., y Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

Sevil, J., García-González, L., Abós, Á., Generelo, E., y Aibar, A. (2019). Can high schools be an effective setting to promote healthy lifestyles? Effects of a multiple behavior change intervention in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(4), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.09.027

Tapia-Serrano, M. A., Sevil, J., Sánchez-Miguel, P. A., López-Gil, J. F., Tremblay, M. S., & García-Hermoso, A. (2022). Prevalence of meeting 24-Hour Movement Guidelines from

pre-school to adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis including 387,437 participants and 23 countries. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 11(4), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2022.01.005

Teraoka, E., Lobo de Diego, F. E., & Kirk, D. (2024). Examining how observed need-supportive and need-thwarting teaching behaviours relate to pupils’ affective outcomes in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 30(1), 105–121.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X231186751

Tirado, S., Neipp, M. C., Quiles, Y., y Rodríguez-Marín, J. (2012). development and validation of the theory of planned behavior questionnaire in physical activity. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 801–816. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38892

Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P. D., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Lee, J., Antczak, D., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Self-determination theory applied

to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1444–1469. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000420

Vermote, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., van der Kaap-Deeder, J., & Beyers, W. (2022). Teachers’ psychological needs link social pressure with personal adjustment and motivating teaching style. Journal of Experimental Education, 91(4), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2022.2039584

White, R. L., Bennie, A., Vasconcellos, D., Cinelli, R., Hilland, T., Owen, K. B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative

studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Javier García Cazorla, Fernández-Miguel, Villafaña-Samper, Mayo-Rota, Diloy-Peña, Abós

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.