Cómo citar
Resumen
El propósito de este trabajo es estudiar la relación entre el uso de diferentes métodos de enseñanza, el compromiso y metas del profesorado. Se aplicó un cuestionario online a una muestra de 365 profesores de educación superior en modalidad b-learning. Los datos recogidos fueron sometidos a análisis descriptivos, correlacionales y de diferencias de medias. El uso de la exposición, un notable nivel de compromiso y una orientación de meta prosocial destacan en los resultados. Se hallaron diferencias significativas entre las variables estudiadas en función de factores como el sexo, edad, experiencia, estatus laboral y área de conocimiento a la que se pertenece. Destaca el mayor uso de la exposición entre los profesores con menos experiencia, el menor uso de herramientas no formales para la comunicación entre los profesores más jóvenes, y un mayor nivel de compromiso entre profesores con un estatus laboral más precario. Se concluye la necesidad de indagar sobre factores contextuales con incidencia en el uso de las metodologías con objeto de fomentar aquellas en la que los estudiantes adoptan un papel más activo.
Citas
Alvarez, I., Guasch, T., y Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: a theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802624104
Aretio, L. G. (2018). Blended learning y la convergencia entre la educación presencial y a distancia. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.1.19683
Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., y Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the case method: Text, cases, and readings. Boston, Massachussets: Harvard Business Press.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Brooke, S. L. (2006). Using the Case Method to Teach Online Classes: Promoting Socratic Dialogue and Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 142-149.
Brookfield, S. D. (2015). Helping Students Take Resposibility for Learning. En S.D. Brookfield (Ed.), The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in the classroom (pp. 236-251). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Campbell, M. G., Powers, T. M., y Zheng, S. L. (2015). Teaching with the Case Study Method To Promote Active Learning in a Small Molecule Crystallography Course for Chemistry Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(2), 270-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00629
Covill, A. E. (2011). College Students' Perceptions of the Traditional Lecture Method. College Student Journal, 45(1), 92-101.
Díaz, M. de M., Rocher, I.A., Urquijo, P.A., Blanco, J.A., Jiménez, E.G., y Fraile, C.L. (2006). Metodologías de enseñanza y aprendizaje para el desarrollo de competencias: orientaciones para el profesorado universitario ante el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Madrid: Alianza editorial.
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Guglielmi, D., Bruni, I., Simbula, S., Fraccaroli, F., y Depolo, M. (2016). What drives teacher engagement: A study of different age cohorts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0263-8
Guillamón, C. L., y Oria, P. P. (Julio, 2012). Good practice in the use of functional teaching methodologies in basic legal sciences subjects. En 4th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, España.
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., y Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of school psychology, 43(6), 495-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
Hollenbaugh, E. E., y Ferris, A. L. (2014). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.055
Johnson, D. W., y Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational researcher, 38(5), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X09339057
King, R. B., y Watkins, D. A. (2012). “Socializing” achievement goal theory: The need for social goals. Psychological studies, 57(1), 112-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0140-8
Lepe, E. M., y Jiménez-Rodrigo, M. L. (2014). Project-based learning in virtual environments: a case study of a university teaching experience. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 11(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v11i1.1762
Leroux, M. (Abril, 2013). Exploring teacher resilience before and during induction. Trabajo presentado al Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, California.
Manca, S., y Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education, 95, 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012
March, A. F. (2006). Metodologías activas para la formación de competencias. Educatio siglo XXI, 24, 35-56.
Maslach, C., y Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of organizational behavior, 2(2), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
McFarlane, D. A. (2015). Guidelines for Using Case Studies in the Teaching-Learning Process. College Quarterly, 18(1), 1-6.
Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. En J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2ª ed., pp. 722-744) New York: Macmillan.
Murphy, W. M. (2011). From e-mentoring to blended mentoring: Increasing students' developmental initiation and mentors' satisfaction. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 606-622. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0090
Oliver, M., y Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’be redeemed?. E-learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.2304%2Felea.2005.2.1.17
Patterson, E. W. (1951). Case Method in American Legal Education: Its Origins and Objectives. Journal of Legal Education, 4(1), 1-24.
Plush, S. E., y Kehrwald, B. A. (2014). Supporting New Academics' Use of Student Centred Strategies in Traditional University Teaching. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 11(1), 1-14.
Pond, K. (2015). Student Engagement in Video Case Based Undergraduate Business Teaching. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(1), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n1p119
Postareff, L., y Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2008). Variation in teachers' descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.008
Prince, M. J., y Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of engineering education, 95(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
Ruiz-Campo, S., Soria-Barreto, K., y Zúñiga-Jara, S. (2016). Aprendizaje basado en equipos con IF-AT: Impacto y percepción en estudiantes universitarios. Estudios pedagógicos, 42(1), 255-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052016000100016
Ruiz-Corbella, M., Diestro, A., y García-Blanco, M. (2016). Participación en foros virtuales en cursos masivos (UNED). Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 18(3), 121-134.
Ryan, R. M., y Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sánchez, M. R. (2011). Metodologías docentes en el EEES: de la clase magistral al portafolio. Tendencias pedagógicas, 17, 83-102.
Sander, P., Stevenson, K., King, M., y Coates, D. (2000). University students' expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher education, 25(3), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070050193433
Sansone, C., y Harackiewicz, J. M. (Eds.). (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego: Academic Press
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., y Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Serafini, R. A. (2016). Las preguntas del docente en la interaccion didáctica. Revista de la Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación, 1(11), 15-28.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., y Janssens, S. (2010). ‘Teach as you preach’: the effects of student‐centred versus lecture‐based teaching on student teachers’ approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760903457818
Suárez, J. M., Rubio, V., Antúnez, R., y Fernández A. P. (2013). Cuestionario de Metas relativas a la profesión docente. Documento de trabajo.
Thomson, M. M., y Palermo, C. (2014). Preservice teachers' understanding of their professional goals: Case studies from three different typologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.002
Urdan, T. C., y Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of educational research, 65(3), 213-243. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543065003213
Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., y Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01195.x
Watson, W. R., y Watson, S. L. (2007). An argument for clarity: what are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become?. TechTrends, 51, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-007-0023-y
Zyngier, D. (2008). (Re) conceptualising student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1765-1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.004