Palabras clave
English as a Foreign Language
Oral Skills
Online Video Discussion
Primary Education Nuevas alfabetizaciones
Inglés como lengua extranjera
Destrezas orales
Videodebates en línea
Educación Primaria
Cómo citar
Resumen
En un mundo cambiante y dinámico que depende cada vez más de las tecnologías, es necesario educar a los niños para que puedan participar plenamente en la sociedad actual y futura. Así, la alfabetización no debe limitarse a los enfoques tradicionales basados en la lectoescritura en la primera lengua del alumnado. Tras analizar el concepto y las implicaciones de las nuevas alfabetizaciones en el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras, se realizó un estudio cuantitativo para explorar las percepciones de los estudiantes españoles de Educación Primaria (n = 82) sobre el desarrollo de nuevas alfabetizaciones en la asignatura de inglés como lengua extranjera tras utilizar la plataforma de videodebates en línea Flipgrid para practicar su expresión oral durante la pandemia derivada de la COVID-19. Asimismo, se analiza si existen diferencias basadas en el género, la edad y la etapa educativa de los participantes. Los resultados muestran que los participantes estaban muy motivados a utilizar esta herramienta digital, que les permite hacer comentarios a los vídeos de sus compañeros, enviar mensajes e incluir ficheros multimedia adicionales, no limitándose así a la lectura de textos en la pantalla del ordenador. Este estudio concluye con una serie de consideraciones para posibles implementaciones en el futuro.
Citas
Abrams, S. S. (2015). Historical trends and contemporary practices. In J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of literacy studies (pp. 354-368). Routledge.
Akkakoson, S. (2016). Reflections from teachers and students on speaking anxiety in an EFL classroom. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(3), 46-70. DOI: 10.1515/jolace-2016-0025
Alexander, B., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2016). Digital literacy: An NMC Horizon Project strategic brief (Vol. 3.3). The New Media Consortium. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182085/
Allen, C. (2015). Marriages of convenience? Teachers and coursebooks in the digital age. ELT Journal, 69, 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv005
Black, R. W. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English-language learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.2.4
Brown, M. (2017a, October 5). A critical review of frameworks for digital literacy: Beyond the flashy, flimsy and faddish – Part 1. ASCILITE TELall blog. https://bit.ly/3pxCU48
Brown, M. (2017b, October 12). A critical review of frameworks for digital literacy: Beyond the flashy, flimsy and faddish – Part 2. ASCILITE TELall blog. https://bit.ly/3hs0Xyv
Castek, J., Beach, R., Cotanch, H., & Scott, J. (2014). Examining middle-school students’ uses of Diigo annotations to engage in collaborative argumentative writing. In R. S. Anderson & C. Mimms (Eds.), Handbook of research on digital tools for writing instruction in K-12 settings (pp. 80–101). IGI Global.
Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online read- ing comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
Dudeney, G., Hockly, N., & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital literacies. Pearson.
Erben, T. (1999). Constructing learning in a virtual immersion bath: LOTE teacher education through audiographics. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), WORLDCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 229–248). Swets & Zeitlinger.
Gee, J. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology, and social practice. Bergin and Garvey.
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). Macmillan.
Hauck, M., & Kurek, M. (2017). Digital literacies in teacher preparation. In S. Thorne & S. May (Eds.), Language, education and technology, encyclopedia of language and education (3rd ed.). Springer.
Kellner, D. (2002). Technological revolution, multiple literacies, and the restructuring of education. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies (pp. 154-169). Routledge.
Kinzer, C. K. & Leu, D. J. (2017). new literacies, New Literacies. In M. A Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (pp. 1559-1565). Springer.
Kinzer, C. K., Turkay, S., Hoffman, D. L., Gunbas, N., Chantes, P., Chaiwinij, A., & Dvorkin, T. (2012). Examining the effects of text and images on story comprehension: An eye-tracking study of reading in a video game and comic book. In P. J. Dunston, S. K. Fullerton, C. C. Bates, K. Headley, & P. M. Stecker (Eds.), Literacy Research Association Yearbook 61 (pp. 259-275). LRA.
Kurek, M., & Hauck, M. (2014). Closing the digital divide – A framework for multiliteracy training. In J. Pettes Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education: Research, perspectives, and best practice (pp. 119–140). CALICO.
Lankshear, C., Gee, J. P., Knobel, M., & Searle, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Open University Press.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies. McGraw-Hill Education.
Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Erlbaum.
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Timbrell, N., & Maykel, C. (2015). Seeing the forest, not the trees: Essential technologies for literacy in the primary-grade and upper elementary- grade classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1406
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New Literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. Alvermann, N. Unruh, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1150-1181). International Reading Association.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. SAGE.
Microsoft. (2020). Flipgrid. https://info.flipgrid.com/
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92. https://bit.ly/3aO7W2D
Öz, H. (2015). Investigating the relationship between foreign language learning and call attitudes among EFL freshman students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 1041-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.576
Salaberry, M. R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00050
Snyder, I., & Beavis, C. (Eds.). (2004). Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world. Hampton Press.
Pegrum, M., Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2018). Digital literacies revisited. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 7(2), 3–24.
Pegrum, M. (2019). Digital Literacies as Lenses. In M. Pegrum (Ed.), Mobile lenses on learning. Languages and literacies on the move (pp. 249-274). Springer.
Phellas, C. N., Bloch, A., & Seale, C. (2011). Structured methods: Interviews, questionnaires and observation. In C. Seale (Ed.), Research society and culture (3rd ed.) (pp. 181-205). SAGE.
Podgoršek, S., Starčič, A. I., & Kacjan, B. (2019). The foreign language teacher's role in ICT-supported instruction. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies/Sodobna Pedagogika, 70(1), 175-190. https://bit.ly/2R6Mhf1
Reguant-Álvarez, M., & Torrado-Fonseca, M. (2016). El método Delphi. REIRE, Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 9(1), 87-102.
Rosyada, A. (2020). Promoting learning from home environments through Google Classroom application for EFL undergraduates. DEIKSIS, 12(3), 229-238. https://bit.ly/3t0cCsA
Sokal, R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometric (3rd ed.). W. H. Freeman.
Suchona, I. J., & Shorna, S. A. (2019). Speaking problems in English and solutions: Scrutinizing students’ perspective. International Journal of English, 8(1), 34-41. https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v8i1.661
Tafazoli, D. (2014, September 9-11). Computer-Assisted Language Learning literacy [Paper presentation]. 7th International Biannual Conference on Issues in English Language Teaching in Iran. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Tafazoli, D. (2017, December 28). CALL Literacy. A series of workshops on Computer-Assisted Language Learning. Islamic Azad University – South Tehran Branch.
Tafazoli, D., Gómez-Parra, M. E., & Huertas-Abril, C. A. (2019). Attitude towards computer-assisted language learning: Do gender, age and educational level matter? Teaching English with Technology, 19(3), 22-39. https://bit.ly/3vzeWIN
Tsiplakides, I., & Keramida, A. (2009). Helping students overcome foreign language speaking anxiety in the English classroom: Theoretical issues and practical recommendations. International Education Studies, 2(4), 39-44. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1065743
Ware, P. (2017). Technology, new literacies, and language learners. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 265-277). Wiley Blackwell.
Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2021 Aula Abierta