Palabras clave
Collaborative Learning
Knowledge co-construction
Computer-mediated communication
Primary Education Mapas conceptuales
Aprendizaje colaborativo
Co-construcción del conocimiento
Comunicación mediada por ordenador
Educación Primaria
Cómo citar
Resumen
La elaboración de mapas conceptuales es una de las estrategias didácticas aplicadas en el aprendizaje colaborativo para apoyar el discurso y el aprendizaje. En este estudio se pretende comparar el efecto en la comprensión y el recuerdo de la elaboración individual o colaborativa de mapas conceptuales en entornos asistidos por ordenador y entornos tradicionales de lápiz y papel en Educación Primaria. La investigación, de carácter cuasiexperimental, se basó en un diseño factorial multi-grupo, con medidas pretest postest y retest. En cuanto a los procesos, se analizaron las estrategias discursivas durante la fase de construcción colaborativa en ambos entornos. Participaron 44 estudiantes de sexto curso, de dos centros educativos. Los resultados obtenidos muestran que los mapas conceptuales elaborados colaborativamente en entornos tradicionales de lápiz y papel produjeron mejores resultados en la comprensión y el recuerdo que en un entorno asistido por ordenador. De igual forma, la grabación, transcripción, segmentación y análisis de las interacciones entre iguales en la fase colaborativa desvelaron secuencias discursivas de baja calidad en ambos entornos. En este sentido, trabajar en entornos asistidos por ordenador en la Educación Primaria, no conduce necesariamente a un uso eficiente y eficaz de los mismos, ni apoya el aprendizaje de conceptos complejos en mejor medida que lo puede hacer un uso tradicional contextos de lápiz y papel.
Citas
Amante, C., Lucero, M., y Montanero, M. (2024). Building and discussing concept maps facilitates learning. [Manuscrito presentado para su publicación]. Departamento de Educación. Universidad de Extremadura.
Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS12031
Cañas, J., Quesada, J, Antolí, A., y Fajardo, I. (2003). Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics. 46, 482-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/0014013031000061640
Castellanos, J., y Niño, S. (2018). Aprendizaje colaborativo y fases de construcción compartida del conocimiento en entornos tecnológicos de comunicación asíncrona. Innovación Educativa, 18(76), 69-88.
Cifuentes, L., y Hsieh, Y. C. (2004). Visualization for middle school student’ engagement in science learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(2), 109-137.
Clark, D., y Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to release structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20216.
Cuban L., Kirkpatrick H., y Peck C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal 38(4), 813-34. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831203800481
De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., y Valcke, M. (2009). Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: the impact of role assignment and self-assessment on students’ levels of knowledge construction through social negotiation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 177-188.
Engel, A., y Onrubia, J. (2014). Estrategias discursivas para la construcción colaborativa del conocimiento en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Cultura y Educación: Culture and Education, 25, 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564013806309082
Farrokhnia, M., Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., Noroozi, O., y Hatami, J. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: The effects of different instructional designs on conceptual understanding and knowledge co-construction. Computers & Education, 142, Article 103640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103640
Fung, D. y Liang, W. (2022). The Effectiveness of Collaborative Mind Mapping in Hong Kong Primary Science Classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10279-1
Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., y Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., y Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397-431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P. C., y González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers & Education, 138, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012
Hew, K. F., y Cheung, W. S. (2011). Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: An analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques. Instructional Science, 39(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9129-2
Islim, O. F. (2018). Technology-supported collaborative concept maps in classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417723231
Izci, E., y Akkoc, E. A. (2024). The impact of concept maps on academic achievement: A meta-analysis, Heliyon,10 (1), e23290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23290
Jeong, A., y Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (2006). The effects of gender interaction patterns on student participation in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54, 543-568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1142 3-006-0636-4
Jonassen, D. H., y Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49, 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504505
Ke, F. y Xie, K. (2009). Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3-4), 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.001
Lehtinen., A., Kostiainen, E., y Näykki, P. (2023). Co-construction of knowledge and socioemotional interaction in pre-service teachers’ video-based online collaborative learning, Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, 104-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104299
Lucas, M., Gunawardena, C., y Moreira, A. (2014). Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 574-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.050
Lucero, M., Montanero, M., y van Boxtel, C. (2024). Semiempty collaborative concept mapping in history education: students’ engagement in historical reasoning and coconstruction. Instructional Science, 52, 557-581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09659-7
Merchie, E., y Van Keer, H. (2016). Mind mapping as a meta-learning strategy: Stimulating pre-adolescents’ text-learning strategies and performance? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 128-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.005
Meyer, B. J. F. (1985). Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures and problems. En B. K. Britton, y J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 11-64). LEA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315099958
Montanero, M., y Tabares, C. (2020). El aprendizaje cooperativo en la Educación Primaria: un estudio sobre el pensamiento del profesorado y la práctica docente en Extremadura. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 24(3), 357-379. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i3.8200
Novak, J. D., y Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 117-153. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028001117
Oittinen, T., Háhn, J., y Räisänen, T. (2022). University students’(dis) engagement experiences in synchronous sessions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital Culture & Education, 14(3), 16-34.
Pinandito, A., Hayashi, Y., y Hirashima, T. (2021). Online Collaborative Kit-Build Concept Map: Learning Effect and Conversation Analysis in Collaborative Learning of English as a Foreign Language Reading Comprehension. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems. E104.D. 981-991. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2020EDP7245
Rosales, J., Iturra, C., Sánchez, E., y De Sixte, R. (2006). El análisis de la práctica educativa. Un estudio de la interacción profesor-alumnos a partir de dos sistemas de análisis diferentes. Infancia y aprendizaje, 29(1), 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037006775380920
Royer, R., y Royer, J. (2004). Comparing hand drawn and computer generated concept mapping. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(1), 67-81.
Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., y Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 2, 421-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y
Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., y Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers and Education, 42(4), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.004
Tan, E., De Weerd, J. G., y Stoyanov, S. (2021). Supporting interdisciplinary collaborative concept mapping with individual preparation phase. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 607-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09963-w.
Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaborations? En L. B. Resnick, R. Saljo, C. Pontecorvo, y B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, Tools, and Reasoning: Situated Cognition and Technologically Supported Environments (pp. 361-384). Springer-Verlag.
Torres, M. C., Navarro, O., Ponce, E., y Sánchez Verdejo, F. J. (2024). La autorregulación y la necesidad de comunicación y de relacionarse a través del Aprendizaje Cooperativo, Aula Abierta, 53(2), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.20935
van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., Roelofs, E., y Erkens, G. (2002). Collaborative concept mapping: Provoking and supporting meaningful discourse. Theory into Practice, 41, 40−46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_7
Wang, C., Kayla Hsub, H., Bonema, E., Mossa, J., Yua, S., Nelsona, D., y Levesque-Bristola, C. (2019). Need satisfaction and need dissatisfaction: A comparative study of online and face-to-face learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.034
Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., y Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2025 Aula Abierta