Palabras clave
retroalimentación
proceso de aprendizaje Formative assessment
feedback
learning process
Cómo citar
Resumen
Los procesos de evaluación participados por el estudiante pueden contribuir a la autorregulación a través del desarrollo del feedback entendido como acción sostenible. Este a su vez viene condicionado por el juicio evaluativo, el cual se fomenta a través de estrategias de apropiación de los criterios, de aplicación de los mismos a la propia tarea o a la de los iguales y de reflexión sobre dicha aplicación. Se realiza una revisión de literatura acerca de la apropiación de los criterios a partir del análisis de 14 artículos. Los resultados muestran los beneficios de desarrollar estrategias de apropiación de los criterios en términos de aumento de la calidad de las tareas. Destaca el uso de ejemplares y de rúbricas, así como de prácticas de evaluación entre iguales. Sin embargo, este proceso no se produce sin un andamiaje. El papel del profesorado es imprescindible tanto para proponer el diseño explícito de estrategias que lleven a la fijación y comprensión de los criterios como para mediar en el proceso que realiza el estudiantado durante la aplicación de los mismos, lo cual permite establecer ciertas implicaciones sobre los procesos de formación para fortalecer la alfabetización evaluativa tanto de estudiantado como de profesorado.
Citas
Ajjawi, R., y Boud, D. (2018). Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1106-1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128
Baartman, L. K., y Prins, F. J. (2018). Transparency or Stimulating Meaningfulness and Self-Regulation? A Case Study About a Programmatic Approach to Transparency of Assessment Criteria. Frontiers in Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00104
Baughan, P. (2020). On Your Marks: Learner-focused Feedback Practices and Feedback Literacy. Advance in Higher Education.
Bearman, M., y Ajjawi, R. (2021). Can a rubric do more than be transparent? Invitation as a new metaphor for assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637842
Biggs, J., y Tang, C. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
Black, P., y Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Boud, D. (2020). Retos en la reforma de la evaluación en educación superior: una mirada desde la lejanía. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 26(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.1.17088
Boud, D. y, Falchikov, N. (Eds.) (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: learning for the longer term. Routledge.
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32.
Broadbent, J., Sharman, S., Panadero, E., y Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2021). How does self-regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade? Comparing online and blended learners. The Internet and Higher Education, 50(March), 100805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100805
Brooks, C., Huang, Y., Hattie, J., Carroll, A., y Burton, R. (2019a). What Is My Next Step? School Students’ Perceptions of Feedback. Frontiers in Education, 4(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00096
Brooks, C., Carroll, A., Gillies, R., y Hattie, J. (2019b). A matrix of feedback for learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 14-32. http://doi.org.10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.2
Brown, S., y Knight, P. (1994) Assessing learners in higher education. Kogan Page.
Bylander, J., y Gustafsson, M. (2021). Improved content mastery and written communication through a lab-report assignment with peer review: an example from a quantum engineering course. European Journal of Physics, 42(2). http://doi.org.10.1088/1361-6404/abcb57
Cano, E., Pons, L., y Ion, G. (2020), The impact of peer feedback on student teachers’ assessment literacy. En P. Baughan (Ed.), On Your Marks: Learner-focused Feedback Practices and Feedback Literacy (60-71). Advance HE.
Cao, Z., Yu, S., y Huang, J. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates' learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 102-112. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001
Carless, D. (2020). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420945845
Carless, D., y Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Carter, R., Salamonson, Y., Ramjan, L. M., y Halcomb, E. (2018). Students use of exemplars to support academic writing in higher education: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 65, 87-93. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.038
Chen, L., Howitt, S., Higgins, D., y Murray, S. (2021). Students' use of evaluative judgement in an online peer learning community. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. http://doi.org.10.1080/02602938.2021.1933378
Clark, I. (2012). Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
Consejo de la Unión Europea (2018). Recomendación del Consejo de 22 de mayo de 2018 relativa a las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea de 4 de junio de 2018. Disponible en: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&from=SV
Dawson, P., Carless, D., y Lee, P. P. W. (2021). Authentic feedback: supporting learners to engage in disciplinary feedback practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1769022
Deeley, S., y Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463-477. https://doi.org.10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Duers, L. (2017). The learner as co-creator: A new peer review and self-assessment feedback form created by student nurses. Nurse Education Today, 58, 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.002
Evans, C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70-120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350
Evans, C., Zhu, X., Winstone, N., Balloo, K., Hughes, A., y Bright, C. (2019). Maximising Student Success through the Development of Self-Regulation. University of Southampton/Office for Students.
García-Jiménez, E. (2015). La evaluación del aprendizaje: de la retroalimentación a la autorregulación. El papel de las tecnologías. RELIEVE, 21(2), art. M2. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.21.2.7546
Ghaffar, M.A., Khairallah, M., y Salloum, S. (2020). Co-constructed rubrics and assessment for learning: The impact on middle school students' attitudes and writing skills. Assessing Writing, 45, 100468. http://ww.doi.org.10.1016/j.asw.2020.100468
Gibbs, G., y Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.
Haerens, L., Krijgsman, C., Mouratidis, A., Borghouts, L., Cardon, G., y Aelterman, N. (2019). How does knowledge about the criteria for an upcoming test relate to adolescents' situational motivation in physical education? A self-determination theory approach. European Physical Education Review, 25(4), 983-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X18783983
Hattie, J., y Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112. http://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hawe, E., y Dixon, H. (2017). Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181-1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
Hawe, E., Dixon, H., y Hamilton, R. (2021a). Why and how educators use exemplars. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(3), art. 010. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.3.10
Hawe, E., Dixon, H., Murray, J., y Chandler, S. (2021b). Using rubrics and exemplars to develop students' evaluative and productive knowledge and skill. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(8), 1033-1047. http://doi.org.10.1080/0309877X.2020.1851358
Henderson, M., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., y Molloy, E. (2019a). The impact of feedback in higher education: Improving assessment outcomes for learners. Palgrave/MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3
Henderson, M., Phillips, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., Dawson, P., Molloy, E., y Mahoney, P. (2019b). Conditions that enable effective feedback. Higher Education Research and Development, 38(7), 1401-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1657807
Higher Education Academy (2013). HEA Feedback Toolkit. The Higher Education Academy https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/resources/feedback_toolkit_whole1_1568036614.pdf
Ho, E. (2017). Improving ESL Formative Assessment Practices and Student Learning via MultiStaged Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations, University of Bristol. https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/175950415/Final_Copy_2018_09_25_Ho_E_L_M_PhD_Redacted.pdf
Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., y Boud, D. (2021). The quality of assessment tasks as a determinant of learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 943-955. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1828268
Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., y Gómez-Ruiz, M. A. (2012). La evaluación entre iguales: beneficios y estrategias para su práctica en la universidad. Revista de educación 359, 206-231.
Jossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., van de Wiel, M., y Boshuizen, H. (2018). Learning in Workplace Simulations in Vocational Education: a Student Perspective. Vocations And Learning, 11(2), 179-204. http://doi.org.10.1007/s12186-017-9186-7
Kruiper, S. M. A., Leenknecht, M. J. M., y Slof, B. (2022). Using scaffolding strategies to improve formative assessment practice in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 458-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1927981
Leslie, L., y Gorman, P. (2017). Collaborative design of assessment criteria to improve undergraduate student engagement and performance. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(3), 286-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1158791
López-Pastor, V., y Sicilia-Camacho, A. (2017). Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535
Malecka, B., Boud, D., y Carless, D. (2020). Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(7), 908-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784
Man, D., Chau, M. H., y Kong, B. (2020). Promoting student engagement with teacher feedback through rebuttal writing. Educational Psychology, 13, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1746238
Molenaar, I., Horvers, A., y Dijkstra, R. (2019). Young Learners’ Regulation of Practice Behavior in Adaptive Learning Technologies. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02792
Monereo, C., Sánchez-Busqués, S., y Suñé, N. (2012). La enseñanza auténtica de competencias profesionales. Un proyecto de aprendizaje recíproco instituto-universidad. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 16(1), 79-101. http:// www.ugr.es/~recfpro/rev161ART6.pdf
Nicol, D., y MacFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
Panadero, E., y Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551-576. https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200
Panadero, E., Andrade, H., y Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: a roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. En M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich y M. Zeinder (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). Academic Press.
Röcker, N., Lottspeich, C., Braun, L., Lenzer, B., Frey, J., Fischer, M. R., y Schmidmaier, R. (2021). Implementation of self-directed learning within clinical clerkships. Gms Journal for Medical Education, 38, 2. https://di.org.10.3205/zma001439
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., y O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
Rodríguez-Gómez, G., y Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. (2015). Assessment as learning and empowerment: Towards sustainable learning in higher education. En M. Peris-Ortiz y J. M. Merigó (Eds.), Sustainable learning in higher education. Developing competencies for the global marketplace (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 10804-9_1
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144.
Sadler, D.R. (2014). Learning from assessment events: The role of goal knowledge. En C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwistle y J. McArthur (Eds.), Advances and innovations in university assessment and feedback (pp. 152-172). Edinburgh University Press.
Salmerón, H., y Gutiérrez-Braojos, C. (2012). La competencia de aprender a aprender y el aprendizaje autorregulado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 16, 5-13.
Scott, G. W. (2017). Active engagement with assessment and feedback can improve group-work outcomes and boost student confidence. Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(1), 1-13. https:doi.org.10.1080/23752696.2017.1307692
Smith, M. y Lowe, C. (2021). DIY assessment feedback: Building engagement, trust and transparency in the feedback process. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(3), art.09. https://doi.org/ 10.53761/1.18.3.9
Sokhanvar, Z., Salehi, K., y Sokhanvar, F. (2021). Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: A systematic literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101030
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., y Panadero, E. (2018). Developing Evaluative judgment: enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
Villarroel, V., Boud, D., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., y Bruna, C. (2020). Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 34, 535-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.15648 82
Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Solution Tree Press.
Winstone, N. E., Mathlin, G., y Nash, R. A. (2019). Building Feedback Literacy: Students’ Perceptions of the Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit. Frontiers in Education, 4(May), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00039
Winstone, N., y Nash, R. (2016). The Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit (DEFT). Higher Education Academy. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/resources/the_developing_engagement_with_feedback_toolkit_deft_0_1568037353.pdf
Winstone, N.E., Nash, R.A., Parker, M., y Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting Learners’ Agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 13-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
Xu, Y., y He, L. (2019). How Pre-service Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment Change Over Practicum: Implications for Teacher Assessment Literacy. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00145
Yuan, J., y Kim, C. (2018). The effects of autonomy support on student engagement in peer assessment. Educational technology research and development, 66(1), 25-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9538-x
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023 Aula Abierta