Un marco pedagógico para promover la competencia financiera sostenible en la educación y formación profesional secundaria
PDF (English)

Palabras clave

pedagogical approach
sustainable development
sustainable finance
sustainable financial literacy
vocational secondary education and training enfoque pedagógico
desarrollo sostenible
finanzas sostenibles
competencia financiera sostenible
educación y formación profesional secundaria

Cómo citar

Margeviča-Grinberga , I., Lake, S., Pigozne, T., Siirilä , J., & Surikova, S. (2023). Un marco pedagógico para promover la competencia financiera sostenible en la educación y formación profesional secundaria: El caso del proyecto SuFi. Aula Abierta, 52(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.52.1.2023.61-70

Resumen

Este artículo analiza la literatura científica y los documentos normativos para diseñar un marco pedagógico para promover la competencia financiera sostenible en la educación y formación profesional secundaria basada en competencias dentro del proyecto Interreg Central Baltic "Sustainability in Finance - SuFi". En 2020-2021 se realizó un estudio empírico que consistió en observar y analizar los procesos de concepción, elaboración y pilotaje de un módulo abierto online sobre cuestiones de sostenibilidad en la educación y formación profesional empresarial dentro del proyecto SuFi. El estudio analizó las respuestas a las entrevistas estructuradas de nueve participantes en el proyecto SuFi; el diseño de análisis de datos cualitativos se basó en la teoría fundada y en el método de comparación constante. Se describen los enfoques pedagógicos para promover la competencia financiera sostenible y se presenta una propuesta sistemática, exhaustiva y basada en evidencias para promover la competencia financiera sostenible en la educación y formación profesional secundaria basada en competencias. El marco pedagógico presentado en este artículo también sugiere direcciones concretas para la práctica pedagógica y la investigación.

https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.52.1.2023.61-70
PDF (English)

Citas

Ahmad, S., Sultana, N., & Jamil, S. (2020). Behaviorism vs constructivism: A paradigm shift from traditional to alternative assessment techniques. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(2), 19–33. http://www.jallr.com/~jallrir/index.php/JALLR/article/view/1092

Ah-Nam, L., & Osman, K. (2017). Developing 21st century skills through a constructivist-constructionist learning environment. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2), 205–216. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/209542/

Bach, C., & Suliková, R. (2019). Competence development in theory and practice: Competence, meta-competence, transfer competence and competence development in their systematic context. Management, 14(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-4231.14.289-304

Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70.

Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022). GreenComp: The European sustainability competence framework. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/13286

Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Cattaneo, K. H. (2017). Telling active learning pedagogies apart: From theory to practice. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.7.237

Cedefop. (2017a). The changing nature and role of vocational education and training in Europe. Volume 1: Conceptions of vocational education and training: An analytical framework. Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2801/532605

Cedefop. (2017b). The changing nature and role of vocational education and training in Europe. Volume 2: Results of a survey among European VET experts. Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2801/548024

Cedefop. (2017c). Cedefop European public opinion survey on vocational education and training. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2801/575587

Cedefop. (2018a). The changing nature and role of vocational education and training in Europe. Volume 3: The responsiveness of European VET systems to external change (1995-2015). Publications Office of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/621137

Cedefop. (2018b). The changing nature and role of vocational education and training in Europe. Volume 4: Changing patterns of enrolment in upper secondary initial vocational education and training (IVET) 1995-2015. Publications Office of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/45684

Cedefop. (2018c). The changing nature and role of vocational education and training in Europe. Volume 5: Education and labour market outcomes for graduates from different types of VET system in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/730919

Cedefop. (2019a). The changing nature and role of vocational education and training in Europe. Volume 6: Vocationally oriented education and training at higher education level. Expansion and diversification in European countries. Publications Office of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/02004

Cedefop. (2019b). The changing nature and role of vocational education and training in Europe. Volume 7: VET from a lifelong learning perspective: continuing VET concepts, providers and participants in Europe 1995-2015. Publications Office of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/357

Cedefop. (2021). The green employment and skills transformation: Insights from a European Green Deal skills forecast scenario. Publications Office of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2801/112540

Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 21-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927

Conlon, C., Timonen, V., Elliott-O’Dare, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Foley, G. (2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319899139

Deloitte. (2019). Deep sector analysis of future sustainable finance skills and talent requirements in Ireland. https://www.skillnetireland.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Sustainable-Finance-Skillnet-Deloitte-Report-Nov-2019.pdf

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. https://www.fulltextarchive.com/pdfs/Democracy-and-Education.pdf

Dziubaniuk, O., & Nyholm, M. (2020). Constructivist approach in teaching sustainability and business ethics: A case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(1), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2020-0081

Eizaguirre, A., García-Feijoo, M., & Laka, J. P. (2019). Defining sustainability core competencies in business and management studies based on multinational stakeholders’ perceptions. Sustainability, 11(8), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11082303

European Commission. (n.d.). Overview of sustainable finance. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/sustainable-finance/overview-sustainable-finance_en (retrieved on 20.03.2022.)

European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1576150542719&uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN

European Commission. (2020a). European skills agenda for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=22832&langId=en

European Commission. (2020b). Osnabrück Declaration on vocational education and training as an enabler of recovery and just transitions to digital and green economies. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/osnabrueck_declaration_eu2020.pdf

Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass.

Hermann, R. R., & Bossle, M. B. (2020). Bringing an entrepreneurial focus to sustainability education: A teaching framework based on content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.119038

Hesselbarth, C., Buhr, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). Management education for sustainability: deriving learning formats from competence requirements. Sustainability in Higher Education, 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100367-1.00002-0

Interreg Central Baltic. (2021). Central Baltic Programme 2021 – 2027: Interreg programme document for public hearing. https://centralbaltic.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/IP_for_public_hearing.pdf

Lambrechts, W., Mulà, I., Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Gaeremynck, V. (2013). The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: An analysis of bachelor programmes in management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.12.034

Laurie, R., Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., Mckeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2016). Contributions of education for sustainable development (ESD) to quality education: A synthesis of research. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216661442

Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11412-008-9056-2

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125083

Luxembourg Sustainable Finance Initiative. (2021). Luxembourg sustainable finance strategy. https://lsfi.lu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Luxembourg-Sustainable-Finance-Strategy_EN.pdf

Mārtinsone, K., Pipere, A., & Kamerāde, D. (Eds.) (2016). Pētniecība: Teorija un prakse [Research: Theory and practice]. RaKa.

Migliorelli, M. (2021). What do we mean by sustainable finance? Assessing existing frameworks and policy risks. Sustainability, 13(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13020975

Mizokami, S. (2018). Deep active learning from the perspective of active learning theory. In K. Matsushita (Ed.), Deep active learning (pp. 79-91). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5660-4_5

Morris, M. H., Webb, J. W., Fu, J., & Singhal, S. (2013). A competence-based perspective on entrepreneurship education: Conceptual and empirical insights. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12023

Noy, S., Patrick, R., Capetola, T., & McBurnie, J. (2017). Inspiration from the classroom: A mixed method case study of interdisciplinary sustainability learning in higher education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 33(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/AEE.2017.22

OECD-GFLEC. (2018). Effective financial education for sustainable and inclusive growth. 5th OECD-GFLEC Global Policy Research Symposium to Advance Financial Literacy. Symposium proceedings, 18 May 2018. https://www.oecd.org/daf/fin/financial-education/FinLit-Paris-2018-Proceedings.pdf

Parrado-Martínez, P., & Sánchez-Andújar, S. (2020). Development of competences in postgraduate studies of finance: A project-based learning (PBL) case study. International Review of Economics Education, 35, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IREE.2020.100192

Praveena, A. C., & Rachel, S. (2018). Financial literacy as transformative tool to stimulate sustainable development of the economy - an empirical approach. Amity Journal of Strategic Management, 2(2), 56-66. https://amity.edu/UserFiles/aibs/82d77.pdf

global environmental governance (pp. 253–254). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367816681-103

Schäfer, E. (2006). Betriebliche Kompetenzentwicklung: Einführung und Evaluation systematischer Kompetenzentwicklungskonzepte. Kassel University Press.

Sharma, S., & Bansal, D. (2017). Constructivism as paradigm for teaching and learning. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health, 4(5), 209–212. https://www.kheljournal.com/archives/2017/vol4issue5/PartD/4-5-41-636.pdf

Schoenmaker, D. (2020). Sustainable finance. In J.-F. Morin & A. Orsini (Eds.), Essential concepts of global environmental governance (pp. 253–254). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367816681-103

Sturing, L., A Biemans, H. J., Mulder, M., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). The nature of study programmes in vocational education: Evaluation of the model for comprehensive competence-based vocational education in the Netherlands. Vocations and Learning, 4, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9059-4

The Council of the European Union. (2020). Council recommendation of 24 November 2020 on vocational education and training (VET) for sustainable competitiveness, social fairness and resilience. Official Journal of the European Union, 2020/C 417/01. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/08b9af27-3465-11eb-b27b-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. UNESCO. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/927unesco10.pdf

Tormo-Carbó, G., Seguí-Mas, E., & Oltra, V. (2018). Business ethics as a sustainability challenge: Higher education implications. Sustainability, 10(8), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10082717

UNESCO. (2016). Unpacking sustainable development goal 4: Education 2030. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246300

Wesselink, R., & Giaffredo, S. (2015). View of competence-based education to develop digital competence. Encyclopaideia, 19(42), 25-42. https://encp.unibo.it/article/view/5537/5239

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2023 Aula Abierta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.