Adaptación española de la Escala de Interés en Estudiantes Universitarios. Estructura factorial, fiabilidad y validez
PDF

Palabras clave

adaptation
university students
academic interest
psychometric properties
validation adaptación
estudiantes universitarios
interés académico
propiedades psicométricas
validación

Cómo citar

Froment, F., de-Besa Gutiérrez, M., & Gil Flores, J. (2024). Adaptación española de la Escala de Interés en Estudiantes Universitarios. Estructura factorial, fiabilidad y validez. Aula Abierta, 53(3), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.21004

Resumen

El interés académico constituye una variable que incide en el proceso de aprendizaje del alumnado. Sin embargo, no se han encontrado instrumentos que midan el interés del alumnado universitario en el contexto español. Por ello, el objetivo de este estudio ha consistido en adaptar y validar al español la Escala de Interés en Estudiantes (Mazer, 2012). En la investigación han participado 447 estudiantes de los Grados de Educación Infantil y Primaria de la Universidad de Cádiz. Los resultados del análisis factorial confirmatorio apoyan tanto la estructura bifactorial propuesta en el modelo original como la solución unifactorial. Asimismo, la escala presenta una fiabilidad adecuada al obtener valores satisfactorios de alfa de Cronbach y omega de McDonald y evidencias de validez convergente con la motivación y satisfacción académica. Se concluye que la Escala de Interés en Estudiantes presenta adecuadas propiedades psicométricas para evaluar el interés académico del alumnado universitario en el aula.

https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.21004
PDF

Citas

Ainley, M. D., Hidi, S., y Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545-561. https://doi.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545

Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., y Schulze, S. K. (1994). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031002313

Bolkan, S., y Griffin, D. J. (2018). Catch and hold: Instructional interventions and their differential impact on student interest, attention, and autonomous motivation. Communication Education, 67(3), 269-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1465193

Borzea, D., y Goodboy, A. K. (2016). When instructors self-disclose but misbehave: Conditional effects on student engagement and interest. Communication Studies, 67(5), 548-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1212912

Broeckelman-Post, M. A., Tacconelli, A., Guzmán, J., Rios, M., Calero, B., y Latif, F. (2016). Teacher misbehavior and its effects on student interest and engagement. Communication Education, 65(2), 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1058962

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Erlbaum.

Campbell, D. T., y Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016

Carmichael, C., Callingham, R., y Watt, H. M. (2017). Classroom motivational environment influences on emotional and cognitive dimensions of student interest in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0831-7

Denker, K. J., Knight, K., Carroll, R. K., Bradley, K. R., Bonine, P. J., Lauck, S. M., Przytulski, H. S., y Storr, M. L. (2022). Assessing student mindset, interest, participation, and rapport in the post-pandemic public speaking classroom: effects of modality change and communication growth mindset. Journal of Communication Pedagogy, 6, 178-194. https://doi.org/10.31446/JCP.2022.1.14

Finn, A. N., y Schrodt, P. (2016). Teacher discussion facilitation: a new measure and its associations with students’ perceived understanding, interest, and engagement. Communication Education, 65(4), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1202997

Froment, F., García, A. J., Bohórquez, M. R., y Checa, I. (2021). Adaptación y validación en español de la Escala de Motivación Estado en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica, 58(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP58.1.10

Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., Shin, M., y Chiasson, R. M. (2022). Affective and interest consequences of lecture misbehaviors for students with mastery goals. Communication Education, 71(3), 223-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2022.2070770

Hambleton, R. K., y de Jong, J. H. A. L. (2003). Advances in translating and adapting educational and psychological tests. Language Testing, 20(2), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt247xx

Hambleton, R. K., y Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1, 1-13.

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., y Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement: Predicting continued interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316-330. https://doi.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316

Harp, S. F., y Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and

illustration: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal

of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.92

Hidi, S., y Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., y Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that

combines affective and cognitive functioning. En D. Y. Dai y R. J. Sternberg (Eds.),

Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition. Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development (pp. 89-115). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hu, L., y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2ª ed.). Guilford.

Krapp, A., Hidi, S., y Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. En K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi y A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3-25). Erlbaum.

Lee, J. (2023). A study on the effect of the violation of communication expectations between military professors and cadets on class interest and engagement. Journal of Advances in Military Studies, 6(1), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.37944/jams.v6i1.182

Linvill, D. (2014). Student interest and engagement in the classroom: Relationships with student personality and developmental variables. Southern Communication Journal, 79(3), 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2014.884156

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., y Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2

Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and validation of the student interest and engagement scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679244

Mazer, J. P. (2013a). Validity of the student interest and engagement scales: Associations with student learning outcomes. Communication Studies, 64(2), 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.727943

Mazer, J. P. (2013b). Associations among teacher communication behaviors, student interest, and engagement: A validity test. Communication Education, 62(1), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.731513

Mazer, J. P. (2013c). Student emotional and cognitive interest as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student engagement: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Communication Education, 62(3), 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.777752

Mazer, J. P. (2017a). Associations among classroom emotional processes, student interest, and engagement: A convergent validity test. Communication Education, 66(3), 350-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1265134

Mazer, J. P. (2017b). Students’ discrete emotional responses in the classroom: Unraveling relationships with interest and engagement. Communication Research Reports, 34(4), 359-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1365233

McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Erlbaum Associates.

Ministerio de Universidades (2023). Datos y cifras del Sistema universitario español. Publicación 2022-2023. Secretaría General Técnica del Ministerio de Universidades.

Nunnally, J. C., y Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.

Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. En J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143-163). Elsevier.

Rotgans, J. I., y Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001

Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. En K. R. Wentzel y A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197-222). Routledge.

Serki, N., y Bolkan, S. (2023). The effect of clarity on learning: impacting motivation through cognitive load. Communication Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2023.2250883

Sidelinger, R. J., y Bell McManus, L. M. (2020). Mentoring faculty and bolstering students’ emotional and cognitive interest: The impact of perceived homophily in the college classroom. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration, 39(1), 23-40.

Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., y Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840

Tabachnick, F., y Fidell, L. (2013). Multivariate statistics. Pearson.

Tang, A. L., Tung, V., y Cheng, T. (2022). Motivating university management students on studying research methods: influence of career applicability, and emotional and cognitive interests. Education+ Training, 64(6), 774-787. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2021-0466

Titsworth, B. S. (2001a). The effects of teacher immediacy, use of organizational lecture cues, and students’ notetaking on cognitive learning. Communication Education, 50(4), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379256

Titsworth, B. S. (2001b). Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students’ affective learning. Communication Studies, 52(3), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970109388552

Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001037

Uzun, T., Özdem, G., y Kara, E. (2018). A Study on the Relation between the Teachers' Communication Skills and Students' Interest to their Classes. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 20(3), 622-636. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.376135

Vergara-Morales, J., Del Valle, M., Díaz, A., y Pérez, M. V. (2018). Adaptación de la Escala de Satisfacción Académica en estudiantes universitarios chilenos. Psicología Educativa, 24(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2018a15

Weber, K. (2003). The relationship of interest to internal and external motivation. Communication Research Reports, 20(4), 376-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388837

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2024 Aula Abierta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.