Palabras clave
high performance
self-concept
educational technology
enrichment program altas capacidades
alto rendimiento
autoconcepto
tecnología educativa
programa de enriquecimiento
Cómo citar
Resumen
El estudio analiza el impacto del programa Conecta-T, un programa pull-out de enriquecimiento curricular, que integra tecnología educativa, en el autoconcepto de estudiantes con altas capacidades intelectuales (ACI) y alto rendimiento académico. Se empleó un diseño cuasiexperimental con un muestreo no probabilístico intencional de grupos equivalentes. De un total de 546 estudiantes de una escuela pública de educación primaria, se seleccionaron 48 alumnos, de entre 9 y 12 años (3.º a 6.º curso). La muestra se dividió en un grupo experimental (24 estudiantes, 16 con ACI) y un grupo control (24 estudiantes, 13 con ACI). El autoconcepto fue evaluado antes y después de la intervención en cinco dimensiones (conductual, intelectual, físico, social y felicidad-satisfacción) mediante la escala de Piers Harris. Los resultados muestran que el programa mejoró significativamente el autoconcepto global y la dimensión de felicidad-satisfacción en el grupo experimental. Estos hallazgos se discuten en el marco de la creación de entornos de aprendizaje donde el uso de tecnología educativa optimice los procesos de enseñanza y potencie el talento, más allá de lo académico.
Citas
Ahmad, S. N., Bakar, A. Y. A., y Mahmud, M. I. (2022). Self-concept of gifted and talented students: A systematic literature review. Specialusis Ugdymas, 1(43), 7099-7112.
Ali, H., y Alrayes, A. (2019). The role of technology in gifted and talented education: A review of descriptive and empirical Research. KnE Social Sciences, 3(24), 26-38. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i24.5165
Alqahtani, R., y Alqahtani, M. (2021). A review of the use of ICT techniques for teaching gifted students. Revista GEINTEC-Gestão Inovação e Tecnologias, 11(4), 2358-2367. https://doi.org/10.47059/revistageintec.v11i4.2283
Alshehri, A. H. A. (2022). Technology use in gifted and talented education in Saudi Arabia: Students’ view of its use and its impact on their learning potential. Educational Sciences: A Quarterly Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journal, 30(3), 1-32.
Androsovych, K. A., Rudyk, Y. M., Melnyk, M. Y., Kovalova, O. A., y Yakymova, I. O. (2021). Psychological guidance of the socialisation process of gifted students using information and communications technology means. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 9(3), 236-246. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2021.09.02.11
Arslan, Ş., y Yüksel, M. Y. (2018). An investigation of the relationship between social behavior characteristics and self-perceptions of gifted children in primary school. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(1), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.2018.71
Artola, T., y Barraca, J. (2004). Creatividad e imaginación: un nuevo instrumento de medida: la PIC. Edupsykhé. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 3(1), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.57087/edupsykhe.v3i1.3752
Artola, T., Ancillo, I., Barraca, J., y Mosteiro, P. (2010). PIC-N: Prueba de imaginación creativa para niños. TEA Ediciones.
Assouline, S. G., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., y Colangelo, N. (2021). Academic acceleration: The theory applied. En Plucker, J. A., Rinn, A. N., y Makel, M. C. (Eds.), From Giftedness to Gifted Education (pp. 1-19). Routledge.
Baccassino, F., y Pinnelli, S. (2023). Giftedness and gifted education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1073007. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1073007
Balestra, S., Sallin, A., y Wolter, S. C. (2023). High-Ability Influencers?: The Heterogeneous Effects of Gifted Classmates. Journal of Human Resources, 58(2), 633-665. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.58.4.0920-11170R1
Bernstein, B. O., Lubinski, D., y Benbow, C. P. (2021). Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 830-845. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000500
Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Oh, S., Azano, A. P., y Hailey, E. P. (2015). What works in gifted education: Documenting the effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model for gifted students. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 137-167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549448
Carman, C. A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definitions of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(1), 52-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12472602
Cash, T. N., y Lin, T. J. (2022). Psychological well-being of intellectually and academically gifted students in self-contained and pull-out gifted programs. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(3), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211032987
Casino-García, A. M., Llopis-Bueno, M. J., y Llinares-Insa, L. I. (2021). Emotional intelligence profiles and self-esteem/self-concept: An analysis of relationships in gifted students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031006
Castelló, A., y Battle, C. (1998). Aspectos teóricos e instrumentales en la identificación del alumno superdotado y talentoso. Propuesta de un protocolo. Faisca, 6, 26-66.
Cazalla, M. N., y Molero, D. (2013). Revisión teórica sobre el autoconcepto y su importancia en la adolescencia. Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Docencia (REID), 10, 43-64.
Corwith, S. (2021). Programming for talent development outside of school. En P. Olszewski-Kubilius, R. F. Subotnik, y F. C. Worrell (Eds.), Talent development as a framework for gifted education (pp. 63-93). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003238454-5
Cross, T. L. (2020). Are our school-aged students with gifts and talents struggling with their psychological well-being to a greater extent than in the past? Gifted Child Today, 43(3), 202-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520916749
David, A., Kiose, V., Maikou, A., Tzelepi, E., y Stathopoulou, A. (2023). The impact of ICTs (Robotics, VR, AI, Games) on gifted students’ education. Eximia, 8, 31-50.
Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., y Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
Engel, A., y Coll, C. (2022). Entornos híbridos de enseñanza y aprendizaje para promover la personalización del aprendizaje. RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 25(1), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.1.31489
Ferrándiz, C., y Prieto, M.D. (2022). Altas capacidades. Percepciones y realidades. El País.
Ferrando, M. (2022). Alumnado de altas capacidades intelectuales: Una aproximación. Aula de secundaria, 47, 8-11.
Fung, J. J. Y., Yuen, M., y Yuen, A. H. K. (2021). Online learning for mathematically talented students: A perspective from Hong Kong. En S. R. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 857-884). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_39
García-Martínez, I., Gutiérrez Cáceres, R., Luque de la Rosa, A., y León, S. P. (2021). Analysing educational interventions with gifted students: A systematic review. Children, 8(5), 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8050365
García-Perales, R., Canuto-González, I., y Cebrián-Martínez, A. (2019a). Alta capacidad y género: La autoestima como factor influyente en las diferencias entre sexos. Contextos Educativos. Revista de Educación, 24, 77-93. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3934
García-Perales, R., Canuto-González, I., y Palomares-Ruiz, A. (2019b). El autoconcepto en la etapa de educación primaria: Incidencia en los alumnos más capaces. MLS Educational Research, 3(2), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.29314/mlser.v3i2.194
García-Perales, R., y Almeida, L. S. (2019). An enrichment program for students with high intellectual ability: Positive effects on school adaptation. Comunicar, 60(2), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.3916/c60-2019-04
Girgin, D. (2020). Evaluation of project-based learning process of gifted children via reflective journals. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12(2), 772-796.
Hodges, J., Tay, J., Maeda, Y., y Gentry, M. (2018). A Meta-Analysis of Gifted and Talented Identification Practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 147-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752107
Housand, B. C., y Housand A. M. (2012). The role of technology in gifted students’ motivation. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 706-715. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21629
Infantes-Paniagua, Á., Fernández-Bustos, J. G., Ruiz, A. P., y Contreras-Jordán, O. R. (2022). Diferencias en el autoconcepto entre alumnado con altas capacidades y alumnado general: un metaanálisis desde 2005 hasta 2020. Anales de Psicología, 38(2), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.461971
Kaplan, S. N. (2023). Self-directed challenges: Self-defined differentiation. Gifted Child Today, 46(1), 57-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175221131909
Kim, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216630607
Kontostavlou, E. Z., y Drigas, A. S. (2019). The use of information and communications technology (ICT) in gifted students. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science and IT, 7(2), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v7i2.10815
Krannich, M., Goetz, T., Lipnevich, A. A., Bieg, M., Roos, A. L., Becker, E. S., y Morger, V. (2019). Being over- or under-challenged in class: Effects on students' career aspirations via academic self-concept and boredom. Learning and Individual Differences, 69, 206-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.10.004
Laine, S., y Tirri, K. (2021). Finnish conceptions of giftedness and talent. En R. J. Sternberg, y D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 235-249). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56869-6_14
Maharmeh, L. (2018). The level of academic self-concept among gifted students with low academic achievement. International Education and Research Journal, 4(4), 36-40.
Marsh, H. W., y Basarkod, G. (2023). Big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): Universality of psychological comparison processes. En M. Bong, S. Kim, y J. Reeve (Eds.), Motivation science: Controversies and insights (pp. 100-107). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197662359.003.0010
National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC). (2019). A Definition of Giftedness that Guides Best Practice [Position statement]. NAGC.
Nicholas, M., Skourdoumbis, A., y Bradbury, O. (2024). Meeting the needs and potentials of high-ability, high-performing, and gifted students via differentiation. Gifted Child Quarterly, 68(2), 154-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862231222225
Opoku, M. P., Alsheikh, N., Moustafa, A., Anwahi, N., Aljaberi, M., Shah, H., Aldarmaki, A., y Elhoweris, H. (2024). An exploration of the self-concept of gifted students in the United Arab Emirates. Current Psychology, 43, 12696-12708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05393-4
Peperkorn, C., y Wegner, C. (2020). The Big-Five-Personality and academic self-concept in gifted and non-gifted students: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 649-667. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1290
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2015). El Modelo Tripartito sobre la alta capacidad y las mejores prácticas en la evaluación de los más capaces. Revista de Educación, 368, 66-95. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2015-368-293
Piñeiro, L. S., Martí, V. M., y González, S. F. (2022). Intervenciones educativas en conducta prosocial y empatía en alumnado con altas capacidades: Una revisión sistemática. Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía, 74(1), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2022.90586
Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., Stumpf, E., Motschenbacher, M., Vogl, K., Scherrer, V., y Schneider, W. (2019). High-ability grouping: Benefits for gifted students’ achievement development without costs in academic self-concept. Child Development, 90(4), 1185-1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12996
Reis, S. M., y Renzulli, J. S. (2022). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A talent development approach resulting in opportunities, resources, and encouragement for all students. En J. L. Nyberg, y J. A. Manzone (Eds.), Advances in Early Childhood and K-12 Education (pp. 39-57). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8153-7.ch004
Rogers, K. B. (2019). Meta-analysis of 26 forms of academic acceleration: Options for elementary (primary) and secondary learners with gifts or talents. En B. Wallace, D. A. Sisk, y J. Senior (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gifted and talented education (pp. 309-320). Sage Reference. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526463074.n26
Rudenko, I. V., Bystrova, N. V., Smirnova, Z. V., Vaganova, O. I., y Kutepov, M. M. (2021). Modern technologies in working with gifted students. Propósitos y representaciones, 9(SPE1), e818. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nspe1.818
Salkind, N. J. (Ed.). (2007). Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952644
Sastre-Riba, S., y Romero L. M. (2023). Alta capacidad: competencias sociales y cyberbullying. Medicina, 83, 64-69.
Serna, P., Ferrándiz, C., y Ferrando, M. (2022). Conecta-T: Programa de desarrollo del talento. Una experiencia en tiempos de COVID 19. En D. Cobos-Sanchiz, E. López-Meneses, A. Jaén-Martínez, A. H. Martín-Padilla, y L. Molina-García (Eds.), Educación y Sociedad: Pensamiento e innovación para la transformación social (pp. 2170-2181). Dykinson.
Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., y Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K-12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849-899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
Sugiarti, R., Erlangga, E., y Pinem, A. P. R. (2024). Technological innovation in the exploration of 5.0 education-based self-esteem-exceed model on gifted intelligent students. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 8(2), 1214-1226. https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.1362
Tomlinson, C. A., y Imbeau, M. B. (2023). Leading and managing a differentiated classroom. Ascd.
Tosun, A. S. (2022). Meta-analysis on the effect of enrichment programs on the academic achievement of gifted and talented students (Tesis doctoral). Bilkent University.
Tourón, J. (2000). Evaluación de programas para alumnos de alta capacidad: algunos problemas metodológicos. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 18(2), 565-585.
van Rossen, J. M., Hornstra, L., y Poorthuis, A. M. (2021). High-ability students in pull-out programs and regular classes: A longitudinal study on perceived social relationships in two settings. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.007
Vargas-Montoya, L., Gimenez, G., y Tkacheva, L. (2024). Only gifted students benefit from ICT use at school in mathematics learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8301-8326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12136-2
Wardman, J., y Hattie, J. (2019). What works better than the rest? The impact of various curricula provisions for gifted learners. En B. Wallace, DA Sisk, y J. Senior (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gifted and talented education (pp. 321-334). Sage Reference. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526463074.n27
Yuste Hernanz, C. (2002). IGF. Inteligencia general y factorial: Manual técnico formas A y B. Editorial EOS.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 Aula Abierta