Keywords
Beliefs
Questionnaire
Literature
Validation literatura
cuestionario
profesor
validez
cognición
How to Cite
Abstract
The analysis of teacher cognition is one of the most valued fields of study in educational research. Within this framework, the aim of this research is to validate two scales designed ad hoc to determine teachers' beliefs and practices about reading classical authors in Secondary Education. After applying the questionnaire (CREPROCLA) to a representative sample of 342 Language and Literature teachers, we undertook a process of content validity by means of a test by expert judges and construct validity by means of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was also calculated. Both scales yielded adequate psychometric properties that were consistent with the initial theoretical constructs. The beliefs scale (53 items) consists of four factors: Personal Relationship with Classics, Negative Beliefs about the Curriculum, Positive Beliefs about Students and Reception and Self-Efficacy. The practice scale (28 indicators) is composed of Reception approach, Traditional approach, Impact of the teaching staff, Curriculum impact and No impact of the socio-cultural component. Thus, CREPROCLA becomes the first instrument validated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in the field of teachers' beliefs about the Didactics of Literature.
References
Abad, F. J., Ponsoda, V., y García, C. (2011). Medición en ciencias sociales y de la salud. Editorial Síntesis.
Applebee, A. N. (1993). Literature in the secondary school: Studies of curriculum and instruction in the United States. National Council of Teachers of English.
Ayuso Collantes, C. (2020). Por una lectura de los clásicos en la adolescencia. Álabe. Revista de Investigación sobre Lectura y Escritura, 22(11), 1-21.
Badash, M., Harel, E., Carmel, R., y Waldman, T. (2020). Beliefs versus declared practices of english as a foreign language (EFL) teachers regarding teaching grammar. World Journal of English Language, 10(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v10n1p49
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Beteta, M.C., Domínguez, F., y Pedrera, M. (2022). Propiedades psicométricas de una prueba sobre creencias docentes respecto de la integración de las TIC. Revista de educación a distancia, 22(70), art.9. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red.524401
Bloom, H. (2000). Cómo leer y por qué́. Anagrama.
Buehl, M., y Beck, J. S. (2014). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and teachers' practices. En H. Fives y M. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 66-84). Routledge.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Calvino, I. (1993). Por qué leer a los clásicos. Tusquets.
Chaharbashloo, H, Gholami, K., Aliasgai, M, Talebzadeh, H., y Mousapour, N. (2020). Analytical reflection on teacher’s practical knowledge: A case study of exemplary teachers in an educational reform context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102931
Ciampa, K., y Gallagher, T. (2021). The development and validation of the Teacher’s Self-Eddicacy Beliefs for Literacy Instruction in the 21st Century scale: A pilot study. Journal in Reading, 44(3), 654-674. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12361
Darragh, J., y Boyd, A. (2019). Text selection: Perceptions of Novice Vs. Veteran Teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 41(1), 61-78, https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1533903
Divsar, H. (2014). A survey of the approaches employed in teaching literature in an efl context. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 4(1), 74-85.
Elliott, V., y Olive, S. (2021). Secondary Shakespeare in the UK: what gets taught and why?. English in Education, 55(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2019.1690952
Elliott, V., y Olive, S. (2023). Secondary Shakespeare in the UK: Pedagogies and Practice. Changing English, 30(4), 402-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2023.2233077
Ferrando, P. J., y Anguiano, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31(1), 18-33.
Fives, H., y Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? En K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer y M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471-499). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019
Gabrielsen, I., Blikstad-Balas, M., y Tengberg, M. (2019). The role of literature in the classroom: How and for what purposes do teachers in lower secondary school use literary texts?. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 19, Runnin(Running Issue), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.17239/l1esll-2019.19.01.13
Guo, Y., Puranik, C., Dinnesen, M. S., y Hall, A. H. (2021). Exploring kindergarten teachers’ classroom practices and beliefs in writing. Reading and Writing, 35, 457-478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10193-y
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., y Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis Multivariante. Prentice Hall.
Hattie, J. (2021). The contributions from the curricula. Visible Learning, 139-170. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332-14
Hernández-Heras, L., Tabernero-Sala, R., y Muela-Bermejo, D. (2024). Creencias, representaciones y saberes de profesores expertos sobre la lectura de los clásicos en ESO. Ocnos, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2024.23.2.445
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., y Mullen, M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Jones, K. (2019). The controversy over young adult literature in english language arts classrooms. Finest.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
Ley Orgánica 3/2018, de 5 de diciembre, de Protección de Datos Personales y garantía de los derechos digitales. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 294, de 6 de diciembre de 2018.
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., y Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
López-Rodríguez, R.M., y Núñez-Delgado, M.P. (2023). La educación literaria desde el paradigma del pensamiento del profesorado: aportaciones de un estudio de caso colectivo en Secundaria. Álabe, 27, 135-153. https://doi.org/10.25115/alabe27.8626
McDonald, R. P., y Ho, M. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082- 989X.7.1.64
Merenda, P. (1997). A guide to the proper use of Factor Analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: pitfalls to avoid. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and evaluation, 30, 156-163.
Mills, N. (2011). Teaching Assistants’ Self-Efficacy in Teaching Literature: Sources, Personal Assessments, and Consequences. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01145.x
Parojenog, C. (2020). Approaches in Teaching Literature Employed by senior high school teachers. Ioer International multidisciplinary research journal, 2(2), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj366
Pérez-Gracia, E., Serrano-Rodríguez, R., y Pontes, A. (2022). Teachers’ Professional Identity Construction: A review of the literature. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 26(1), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v26i1.13211
Pérez, E. R., y Medrano, L. A. (2010). Análisis factorial exploratorio: bases conceptuales y metodológicas. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento (RACC), 2(1), 58-66.
Persico, D., Manganello, F., y Passarelli, M. (2020). Participatory approaches to Learning Design: the gap between theory and practice. Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 44, 96-108.
Polizzi, S. J., Zhu, Y., Reid, J. W., Ofem, B., Salisbury, S., Beeth, M., Roehrig, G., Mohr-Schroeder, M., Sheppard, K., y Rushton, G. T. (2021). Science and mathematics teacher communities of practice: social influences on discipline-based identity and self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00275-2
Putwain, D., y Von der Embse, N. (2019) Teacher self-efficacy moderates the relations between imposed pressure from imposed curriculum changes and teacher stress. Educational Psychology, 39(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1500681
Rahmani, D., Ghonsooly, B., y Pishghadam, R. (2020). Development and validation of an Inventory on Teachers’ Beliefs about Action Research (ITBAR) in second language education. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(5), 428-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1824233
Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 27 de abril de 2016, relativo a la protección de las personas físicas en lo que respecta al tratamiento de datos personales y a la libre circulación de estos datos y por el que se deroga la Directiva 95/46/CE (Reglamento general de protección de datos). Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea, DO L 119, de 4 de mayo de 2016.
Romero Oliva, M. F., y Trigo, E. (2018). Entre las creencias y la formación inicial de los estudiantes del Máster de Profesorado de Secundaria: una mirada hacia la enseñanza de la literatura en las aulas. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 22(1), 73-96.
Rosenblatt, L. (1968) Literature as exploration. Heinemann.
Schutz, P., Hong, J., y Francis, D. (2020). Teachers’ goals, beliefs, emotions, and identity development. Investigating Complexities in the Profession. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429456008
Shah, M. (2020). ‘It was a pleasure to read with them’: Reflecting on Jane Eyre as a class reader. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 27(4), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2020.1807312
Sotomayor, M. V. (2013). ¿Qué hacemos con los clásicos? Algunas reflexiones para los futuros docentes. Lenguaje y Textos, 38, 29-35.
Stickler, U. (2021). Investigating language teachers’ ideals in images and interviews. System, 97, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102424
Stotsky, S. (2010). Literary Study in Grades 9, 10, and 11: A National Survey. Forum American Bar Association, 4, 2-76.
Sullá, E. (1998). El canon literario. Arco Libros.
Szabo, S., y Mokhtari, K. (2004). Developing a Reading Teaching Efficacy Instrument for Teacher Candidates: A Validation Study. Action in Teacher Education, 26(3), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2004.10463333
Torrano-Guillamón, L., Cascales-Martínez, A., y Carillo-García, M. (2019). Use of Literature, Resources and Innovative Methodologies in the English Classroom. Porta Linguarum, 32, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.30827/pl.v0i32.13699
Torrijos, C. C. (2019). La lectura de los clásicos en Secundaria. Revista Graphos, 21(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1516- 1536.2019v21n1.46523
Van Rijt, J. H. M., Wijnands, A., y Coppen, P.-A. J. M. (2020). Investigating Dutch teachers’ beliefs on working with linguistic metaconcepts to improve students’ L1 grammatical understanding. Research Papers in Education, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1784258
Wang, S., Rubie-Davies, C. M., y Meissel, K. (2018). A systematic review of the teacher expectation literature over the past 30 years. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3-5), 124-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1548798
Watkins, N., y Ostenson, J. (2015). Navigating the Text Selection Gauntlet: Exploring Factors That Influence English Teachers’ Choices. English Education, 47(3), 245.
Wintersparv, S. (2022). The Role of Aesthetics in Swedish Literature Studies: A Survey beyond Measurability of the Teaching of Literature. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(3), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869088
Witte, T. C. H., y Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2015). In search of the excellent literature teacher. An inductive approach to constructing professional teaching standards. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(5), 565-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995478
Wood, A. (2018). Pre‐twentieth century literature in the Year 9 classroom: Student responses to different teaching approaches. English in Education, 51(3), 308-326, https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2017.11964032
Yang, A. (2022). Young Adult and Canonical Literature Instruction in the High School Classroom: Assessing Students’ Reading Interest. Alpenglow: Binghamton University Undergraduate Journal of Research and Creative Activity, 8(1), 6.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Aula Abierta