Palabras clave
critical thinking
open educational resources
documentary analysis
universities competencia digital
pensamiento crítico
recursos educativos abiertos
análisis documental
universidades
Cómo citar
Resumen
Las universidades tienen el mandato de preparar profesionales cualificados que hagan frente a los retos sociales actuales y futuros mientras promueven su transformación digital. Así, son fundamentales aspectos como la competencia digital que vaya más allá de las habilidades técnicas básicas, la agencia para el aprendizaje entendida como empoderamiento a nivel individual y colectivo, o el movimiento de educación abierta. Este estudio tiene como objetivo establecer la situación actual de la competencia digital crítica, la agencia para el aprendizaje y la educación abierta en el sistema universitario español. Para ello, se realizó un análisis de las 84 páginas web institucionales con un web scraping y un análisis de contenido. Los resultados se han categorizado de acuerdo con tres niveles de planificación educativa: macro, meso y micro. Se identifica una presencia baja en el contexto español en relación con la competencia digital crítica y la agencia para el aprendizaje en los registros analizados, siendo más presente la educación abierta, de la que se detecta una mayor actividad a nivel institucional. Como conclusión, se apunta a la necesidad de una mayor integración de los conceptos a nivel institucional práctico y normativo, y se ofrecen recomendaciones a los tres niveles de categorización.
Citas
Aagaard, T., y Lund, A. (2020). Digital Agency in Higher Education. Transforming Teaching and Learning. Routledge Focus.
Agudelo, O., y Salinas, J. (2015). Flexible Learning Itineraries Based on Conceptual Maps. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 4(2), 70-76. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2015.7.130
Atenas J., Havemann L., y Timmermann C. (2020). Critical literacies for a datafied society: academic development and curriculum design in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2468
Archer, M. S. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press.
Bali, M., Cronin, C., y Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing Open Educational Practices from a Social Justice Perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699280
Biesta, G., y Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
Brod, G., Kucirkova, N., Shepherd, J., Jolles, D., y Molenaar, I. (2023). Agency in Educational Technology: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Implications for Learning Design. Educational Psychology Review 35(25), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09749-x
Cabero-Almenara, J., Barroso-Osuna, J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., y Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2025). Creencias pedagógicas docentes y su aceptación de la inteligencia artificial en la educación superior: un estudio comparativo entre países. Aula Abierta, 54(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.21273
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
Dabbagh, N., y Castañeda, L. (2020). The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3041–3055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09831-z
Darvin, R. (2017). Language, Ideology, and Critical Digital Literacy. En S. Thorne and S. May, S. (eds), Language, Education and Technology. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (3rd Ed.) (pp 17-30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02237-6_35
Digital Methods Initiative. (2018). Search Engine Scrapper. https://www.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/ToolSearchEngineScraper
Domingo-Coscollola, M., Bosco-Paniagua, A., Carrasco-Segovia, S., y Sánchez-Valero, J.-A. (2019). Fomentando la competencia digital docente en la universidad: Percepción de estudiantes y docentes. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 38(1), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.340551
Duraiappah, A. K., van Atteveldt, N., Buil, J. M., Singh, K., y Wu, R. (2022). Reimagining Education: The International Science and Evidence based Education Assessment: Summary for Decision Makers. UNESCO MGIEP. https://doi.org/10.56383/iqax5928
Ehlers, U. D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1-10.
Emirbayer, M., y Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Esteve, F., Marín, V. I., Tur, G., Orellana, M., L., Villagrá, S., y Aguilar, D. (2024). Menciones web de universidades españolas (competencia digital crítica, práctica educativa abierta y agencia para el aprendizaje [Base de datos, en línea]. CORA. Repositori de Dades de Recerca, V2. https://doi.org/10.34810/data1334
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., y Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540
European Commission. Joint Research Centre. (2022). Competencias digitales del profesorado universitario en España: Un estudio basado en los marcos europeos DigCompEdu y OpenEdu. Publications Office Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/448078
Feenberg, A. (2003). What Is Philosophy of Technology? [Lecture for the Komaba undergraduates]. San Diego State University.
Gomar Giner, A. (2025). Ética e Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación: un enfoque supranacional para la formación docente en España. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education (JOSPOE), 23, 70-89.
Gil Quintana, J. (2024). Los sNOOC, un modelo educativo masivo, abierto y en línea, desde el empoderamiento social y el enfoque minimalista. Revista Latinoamericana Ogmios, 4(11), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.53595/rlo.v4.i11.105
Havemann, L. (2016). Open educational resources. En M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (pp 1-7). Springer.
Herrera-Urizar, G., Blanco-Navarro, M., Lozano-Mulet, P., y Neut-Aguayo, P. (2024). ¿Interés Comercial o Pedagógico? Las Plataformas Educativas de las Big Tech y el Libre Desarrollo de la Infancia. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 22(2), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2024.22.2.004
Ibrahim, S., Vasalou, A., y Benton, L. (2022). Understanding the situated practices of school technology leaders in the early stages of educational technology adoption. En S. Barbosa (Ed.), Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 1-14). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502120B
Jääskelä, P., Poikkeus, A. M., Vasalampi, K., Valleala, U. M., y Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Assessing agency of university students: validation of the AUS Scale. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2061-2079. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130693
Klemenčič, M., Pupinis, M., y Kirdulyté, G. (Eds.). (2020). Mapping and analysis of student centred learning and teaching practices: Usable knowledge to support more inclusive, high quality higher education (NESET Report). Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/67668
Koseoglu, S., Bozkurt, A., y Havemann, L. (2020). Critical Questions for Open Educational Practices. Distance Education, 41(2), 153-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1775341
Marín, V. I. (2022). The Case of Spain. En V. I. Marín, L. Peters, y O. Zawacki-Richter. (Eds.). (Open) Educational Resources around the World: An International Comparison. EdTech Books.
Marín, V. I., y Angulo Mendoza, G. A. (2025). Digital Competence in Quebec’s Teacher Education Programs: Toward a Critical Perspective. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(5), 45–74. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i5.8957
Milton, J., Giæver, T. H., Mifsud, L., y Gassó, H. H. (2021). Awareness and knowledge of cyberethics: A comparative study of preservice teachers in Malta, Norway, and Spain. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4257
Miao, F., Mishra, S., Orr, D., y Janssen, B. (2019). Guidelines on the development of open educational resources policies. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] and Commonwealth of Learning [COL].
Nascimbeni, F., y Burgos, D. (2016). In search for the Open Educator: Proposal of a definition and a framework to increase openness adoption among university educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2736
Neut Aguayo, P., Blanco-Navarro, M., Lozano-Mulet, P., y Dussel, I. (2024). Plataformización educativa y profesionalidad docente: tensiones y nudos críticos. Edutec, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 87, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2024.87.3107
Novella-García, C., y Cloquell-Lozano, A. (2021). The ethical dimension of digital competence in teacher training. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3529–3541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10436-z
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2019). Future of Education and Skills 2030. Conceptual learning framework. Student Agency for 2030. OECD.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422), art. 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
Pangrazio, L., y Selwyn, N. (2019). Personal data literacies: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818799523
Passey, D., Shonfeld, M., Appleby, L., Judge, M., Saito, T., y Smits, A. (2018). Digital Agency: Empowering Equity in and through Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23, 425-439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9384-x
Rodés-Paragarino, V., y Gewerc-Barujel, A. (2020). Ownership and Agency in the adoption of Open Educational Resources. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal - IxD&A, 45, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.55612/s-5002-045-003
Rodríguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J., y García, E. (1996). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Aljibe.
Short, C. R., Hilton, B., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., Chaffee, R., Guilmett, J., y Darrow, J. (2026). Higher education instructors’ perceptions of open pedagogy: an exploratory study of open pedagogy definitions in practice. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 41(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2024.2334237
Stenalt, M. H., y Lassesen, B. (2022). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653-669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874
Swain, B.K., y Pathak, R.K. (2024). Benefits and challenges of using oer in higher education: a pragmatic review. Discover Education 3(81),1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00142-6
Tlili, A., y Burgos, D. (2024). Unleashing the power of Open Educational Practices (OEP) through Artificial Intelligence (AI): where to begin? Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6886–6893. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2101595
Tlili, A., Garzón, J., Salha, S., Huang, R., Xu, L., Burgos, D., Denden, M., Farrel, O., Farrow, R., Bozkurt, A., Amiel, T., McGreal, R., López-Serrano, A., y Willey, D. (2023). Are open educational resources (OER) and practices (OEP) effective in improving learning achievement? A meta-analysis and research synthesis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, art. 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. (2022). K-12 AI curricula: A mapping of government-endorsed AI curricula. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ELYF6010
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO]. (2019). Recommendation on Open Educational Resources.
van der Walt, L., y Bosch, C. (2025). Co-Creating OERs in Computer Science Education to Foster Intrinsic Motivation. Education Sciences, 15(7), 785. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070785
Villar-Onrubia, D., Morini, L., Marín, V. I., y Nascimbeni, F. (2022). Critical digital literacy as a key for (post)digital citizenship: An international review of teacher competence frameworks. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 18(3), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135697
Wiley, D., y Green, C. (2012). Why openness in education? En D. Oblinger (Ed.), Game changers. Education and information technologies (pp. 81-90). Educause.
Zou, R., Jiang, L., y Wider, W. (2025). Bibliometric Insights into the Open Education Landscape. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 26(1), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v26i1.7953
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2026 Aula Abierta